脂褐质病作为自身免疫性肝炎药物性肝损伤的新鉴别特征。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sabine Weber, Franziska Erhardt, Jens Neumann, Julian Allgeier, Didem Saka, Nirali Donga, Izabel Mircheva, Rochell Balakumar, Christian M Lange, Alexander L Gerbes
{"title":"脂褐质病作为自身免疫性肝炎药物性肝损伤的新鉴别特征。","authors":"Sabine Weber, Franziska Erhardt, Jens Neumann, Julian Allgeier, Didem Saka, Nirali Donga, Izabel Mircheva, Rochell Balakumar, Christian M Lange, Alexander L Gerbes","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2517207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Differentiating drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a diagnostic challenge. Liver biopsy is recommended in unclear cases, however, clear distinguishing patterns are unknown. We therefore aimed to further identify histopathological features that can discriminate DILI from AIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and histological data of well-characterised 136 DILI and 43 AIH patients from our prospective cohort on patients with acute liver injury and potential drug-related cause were analysed. Logistic binary regression was performed to identify models that could differentiate both two entities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological findings showed high overlaps between DILI and AIH, and overall concordance between histological and clinical diagnosis was low (48.9%). While interface hepatitis, plasma cell infiltration, and portal-intralobular infiltration were favouring AIH, relevant proportions of DILI patients also presented with those features (44.1%, 46.3% and 29.2%, respectively). Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, lipofuscinosis was the only independent predictor of DILI diagnosis, showing a strong association with DILI diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 10.8; positive predictive value [PPV] 96.2%). Moreover, logistic regression analysis showed that a model combining different histopathological features (lack of interface hepatitis, fibrosis and eosinophils together with presence of cholestasis, steatosis and lipofuscinosis) could differentiate DILI from AIH with an accuracy of 76.5% and a strikingly high sensitivity of 94.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DILI and AIH showed similar histological patterns, however lipofuscinosis was identified as a novel distinctive feature for DILI with an extraordinarily high PPV. Moreover, a model combining a variety of histological features could differentiate both entities with high sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipofuscinosis as a novel discriminating feature for drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Sabine Weber, Franziska Erhardt, Jens Neumann, Julian Allgeier, Didem Saka, Nirali Donga, Izabel Mircheva, Rochell Balakumar, Christian M Lange, Alexander L Gerbes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2025.2517207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Differentiating drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a diagnostic challenge. Liver biopsy is recommended in unclear cases, however, clear distinguishing patterns are unknown. We therefore aimed to further identify histopathological features that can discriminate DILI from AIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and histological data of well-characterised 136 DILI and 43 AIH patients from our prospective cohort on patients with acute liver injury and potential drug-related cause were analysed. Logistic binary regression was performed to identify models that could differentiate both two entities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological findings showed high overlaps between DILI and AIH, and overall concordance between histological and clinical diagnosis was low (48.9%). While interface hepatitis, plasma cell infiltration, and portal-intralobular infiltration were favouring AIH, relevant proportions of DILI patients also presented with those features (44.1%, 46.3% and 29.2%, respectively). Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, lipofuscinosis was the only independent predictor of DILI diagnosis, showing a strong association with DILI diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 10.8; positive predictive value [PPV] 96.2%). Moreover, logistic regression analysis showed that a model combining different histopathological features (lack of interface hepatitis, fibrosis and eosinophils together with presence of cholestasis, steatosis and lipofuscinosis) could differentiate DILI from AIH with an accuracy of 76.5% and a strikingly high sensitivity of 94.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DILI and AIH showed similar histological patterns, however lipofuscinosis was identified as a novel distinctive feature for DILI with an extraordinarily high PPV. Moreover, a model combining a variety of histological features could differentiate both entities with high sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2517207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2517207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:鉴别药物性肝损伤(DILI)和自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)是一个诊断挑战。肝活检建议在不明确的病例,但明确的区分模式是未知的。因此,我们旨在进一步确定可以区分DILI和AIH的组织病理学特征。方法:对136例DILI和43例AIH患者的临床和组织学资料进行分析,分析急性肝损伤和潜在药物相关原因的前瞻性队列。进行逻辑二元回归以识别可以区分这两个实体的模型。结果:DILI和AIH的组织病理学表现有较高的重叠,组织病理学和临床诊断的总体一致性较低(48.9%)。界面肝炎、浆细胞浸润和门静脉小叶内浸润是AIH的优势,DILI患者的相关比例也表现出这些特征(分别为44.1%、46.3%和29.2%)。有趣的是,在多变量分析中,脂褐素病是DILI诊断的唯一独立预测因子,显示与DILI诊断有很强的相关性(比值比[OR] 10.8;阳性预测值[PPV] 96.2%)。此外,逻辑回归分析显示,结合不同组织病理学特征(缺乏界面肝炎、纤维化和嗜酸性粒细胞,同时存在胆汁沉积、脂肪变性和脂褐质沉积)的模型可以区分DILI和AIH,准确率为76.5%,灵敏度高达94.9%。结论:DILI和AIH表现出相似的组织学模式,然而脂褐质沉积症被认为是DILI具有极高PPV的一个新的独特特征。此外,结合多种组织学特征的模型可以高灵敏度地区分两种实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lipofuscinosis as a novel discriminating feature for drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis.

Background and objective: Differentiating drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a diagnostic challenge. Liver biopsy is recommended in unclear cases, however, clear distinguishing patterns are unknown. We therefore aimed to further identify histopathological features that can discriminate DILI from AIH.

Methods: The clinical and histological data of well-characterised 136 DILI and 43 AIH patients from our prospective cohort on patients with acute liver injury and potential drug-related cause were analysed. Logistic binary regression was performed to identify models that could differentiate both two entities.

Results: Histopathological findings showed high overlaps between DILI and AIH, and overall concordance between histological and clinical diagnosis was low (48.9%). While interface hepatitis, plasma cell infiltration, and portal-intralobular infiltration were favouring AIH, relevant proportions of DILI patients also presented with those features (44.1%, 46.3% and 29.2%, respectively). Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, lipofuscinosis was the only independent predictor of DILI diagnosis, showing a strong association with DILI diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 10.8; positive predictive value [PPV] 96.2%). Moreover, logistic regression analysis showed that a model combining different histopathological features (lack of interface hepatitis, fibrosis and eosinophils together with presence of cholestasis, steatosis and lipofuscinosis) could differentiate DILI from AIH with an accuracy of 76.5% and a strikingly high sensitivity of 94.9%.

Conclusions: DILI and AIH showed similar histological patterns, however lipofuscinosis was identified as a novel distinctive feature for DILI with an extraordinarily high PPV. Moreover, a model combining a variety of histological features could differentiate both entities with high sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信