癌症患者的生命终结:欧洲的医学法律含义和伦理挑战。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/med-2025-1218
Susanna Marinelli, Nicola Di Fazio, Miriam Ottaviani, Gianpietro Volonnino, Simona Zaami, Lina De Paola
{"title":"癌症患者的生命终结:欧洲的医学法律含义和伦理挑战。","authors":"Susanna Marinelli, Nicola Di Fazio, Miriam Ottaviani, Gianpietro Volonnino, Simona Zaami, Lina De Paola","doi":"10.1515/med-2025-1218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explores the complexities and distinctive traits of end-of-life (EOL) care and assisted suicide in cancer patients across Europe, and the challenges they entail. It analyzes various countries in the Southern, Central, and Northern regions. Legal, ethical, and cultural dimensions of euthanasia are examined. Differences in practices across Europe are highlighted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aim of this study is to provide an overview of EOL care policies in Europe by delving into the legislative/policy-making approaches of three selected nations, and implications thereof.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disparities between regions are identified, to figure out margins for improvement. This includes advocating for a balanced approach that both upholds legal frameworks and respects patient autonomy. By doing so, the ultimate objective is to foster a culture of ethical and empathetic EOL care for cancer patients throughout Europe, ensuring that their needs and preferences are prioritized till the end. Advocacy for a balanced approach is recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, the findings herein presented point to the need for a collaborative effort among policymakers, healthcare providers, and communities to build a more holistic approach to end-of-life care that harmonizes legal regulations with the ethical imperative of respecting individual choice in an environment marked by sensitivity and compassion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19715,"journal":{"name":"Open Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"20251218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-life in cancer patients: Medicolegal implications and ethical challenges in Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Marinelli, Nicola Di Fazio, Miriam Ottaviani, Gianpietro Volonnino, Simona Zaami, Lina De Paola\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/med-2025-1218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explores the complexities and distinctive traits of end-of-life (EOL) care and assisted suicide in cancer patients across Europe, and the challenges they entail. It analyzes various countries in the Southern, Central, and Northern regions. Legal, ethical, and cultural dimensions of euthanasia are examined. Differences in practices across Europe are highlighted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aim of this study is to provide an overview of EOL care policies in Europe by delving into the legislative/policy-making approaches of three selected nations, and implications thereof.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disparities between regions are identified, to figure out margins for improvement. This includes advocating for a balanced approach that both upholds legal frameworks and respects patient autonomy. By doing so, the ultimate objective is to foster a culture of ethical and empathetic EOL care for cancer patients throughout Europe, ensuring that their needs and preferences are prioritized till the end. Advocacy for a balanced approach is recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, the findings herein presented point to the need for a collaborative effort among policymakers, healthcare providers, and communities to build a more holistic approach to end-of-life care that harmonizes legal regulations with the ethical imperative of respecting individual choice in an environment marked by sensitivity and compassion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"20251218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1218\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究探讨了欧洲癌症患者临终关怀和协助自杀的复杂性和独特特征,以及它们所带来的挑战。它分析了南部、中部和北部地区的各个国家。法律,道德和文化层面的安乐死进行了检查。报告强调了欧洲各国在实践上的差异。材料和方法:本研究的目的是通过深入研究三个选定国家的立法/政策制定方法及其影响,提供欧洲EOL护理政策的概述。结果:确定了区域间的差异,找出了改进的余地。这包括倡导一种既维护法律框架又尊重患者自主权的平衡方法。通过这样做,最终目标是为整个欧洲的癌症患者培养一种道德和同理心的EOL护理文化,确保他们的需求和偏好得到优先考虑。建议倡导一种平衡的方法。结论:最终,本文提出的研究结果表明,决策者、医疗保健提供者和社区之间需要共同努力,建立一种更全面的临终关怀方法,使法律法规与尊重个人选择的道德要求在一个以敏感和同情为标志的环境中协调一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

End-of-life in cancer patients: Medicolegal implications and ethical challenges in Europe.

End-of-life in cancer patients: Medicolegal implications and ethical challenges in Europe.

Introduction: This study explores the complexities and distinctive traits of end-of-life (EOL) care and assisted suicide in cancer patients across Europe, and the challenges they entail. It analyzes various countries in the Southern, Central, and Northern regions. Legal, ethical, and cultural dimensions of euthanasia are examined. Differences in practices across Europe are highlighted.

Materials and methods: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of EOL care policies in Europe by delving into the legislative/policy-making approaches of three selected nations, and implications thereof.

Results: Disparities between regions are identified, to figure out margins for improvement. This includes advocating for a balanced approach that both upholds legal frameworks and respects patient autonomy. By doing so, the ultimate objective is to foster a culture of ethical and empathetic EOL care for cancer patients throughout Europe, ensuring that their needs and preferences are prioritized till the end. Advocacy for a balanced approach is recommended.

Conclusion: Ultimately, the findings herein presented point to the need for a collaborative effort among policymakers, healthcare providers, and communities to build a more holistic approach to end-of-life care that harmonizes legal regulations with the ethical imperative of respecting individual choice in an environment marked by sensitivity and compassion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Medicine
Open Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Medicine is an open access journal that provides users with free, instant, and continued access to all content worldwide. The primary goal of the journal has always been a focus on maintaining the high quality of its published content. Its mission is to facilitate the exchange of ideas between medical science researchers from different countries. Papers connected to all fields of medicine and public health are welcomed. Open Medicine accepts submissions of research articles, reviews, case reports, letters to editor and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信