药物使用障碍对医疗参保人员接受多周门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗的影响:2015 - 2020年基于索赔的队列研究

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf315
Daniel J Rogers, Lingyu Zhao, Duna Zhan, Xianyan Chen, Martin Krsak, Andrés F Henao-Martínez, Daniel B Chastain
{"title":"药物使用障碍对医疗参保人员接受多周门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗的影响:2015 - 2020年基于索赔的队列研究","authors":"Daniel J Rogers, Lingyu Zhao, Duna Zhan, Xianyan Chen, Martin Krsak, Andrés F Henao-Martínez, Daniel B Chastain","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is often withheld from individuals with substance use disorder (SUD), despite evidence suggesting similar outcomes. We investigated this using a large, nationwide claims database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Merative MarketScan (2015-2020) data to identify adults treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for ≥7 days after hospitalization. Patients with end-stage renal disease or <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> were excluded. SUD was defined using pre-discharge International Classification of Diseases 10-CM codes. Rates of overdose, central venous catheter (CVC) events during OPAT, and 90-day all-cause readmissions following OPAT completion were compared between patients with and without SUD, adjusting for confounders via multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5903 patients, 18% had SUD. These patients were younger, less often male, and less likely discharged home. Unadjusted rates of 90-day readmission (40.1% vs 32.5%, <i>P</i> < .001) and overdose (1.2% vs 0.1%, <i>P</i> < .001) were higher in the SUD group, whereas CVC event rates were similar (6.5% vs 5.3%, <i>P</i> = .137). However, adjusted analyses revealed SUD was not significantly associated with readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, <i>P</i> = .067) or CVC events (OR 1.10, <i>P</i> = .552), but was associated with higher odds of overdose (OR 6.03, <i>P</i> < .001). Readmission was predicted by insurance type, mental health disorders, and infection type. CVC events were associated with infection type and discharge to home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD was not independently associated with increased 90-day readmission or CVC event risk, but was a significant risk factor for overdose, supporting harm reduction approaches over exclusion from OPAT based on SUD status.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 6","pages":"ofaf315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Substance Use Disorders on Outcomes of Medically Insured Persons Receiving Multiweek Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: a Claims-based Cohort Study From 2015 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Rogers, Lingyu Zhao, Duna Zhan, Xianyan Chen, Martin Krsak, Andrés F Henao-Martínez, Daniel B Chastain\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is often withheld from individuals with substance use disorder (SUD), despite evidence suggesting similar outcomes. We investigated this using a large, nationwide claims database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Merative MarketScan (2015-2020) data to identify adults treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for ≥7 days after hospitalization. Patients with end-stage renal disease or <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> were excluded. SUD was defined using pre-discharge International Classification of Diseases 10-CM codes. Rates of overdose, central venous catheter (CVC) events during OPAT, and 90-day all-cause readmissions following OPAT completion were compared between patients with and without SUD, adjusting for confounders via multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5903 patients, 18% had SUD. These patients were younger, less often male, and less likely discharged home. Unadjusted rates of 90-day readmission (40.1% vs 32.5%, <i>P</i> < .001) and overdose (1.2% vs 0.1%, <i>P</i> < .001) were higher in the SUD group, whereas CVC event rates were similar (6.5% vs 5.3%, <i>P</i> = .137). However, adjusted analyses revealed SUD was not significantly associated with readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, <i>P</i> = .067) or CVC events (OR 1.10, <i>P</i> = .552), but was associated with higher odds of overdose (OR 6.03, <i>P</i> < .001). Readmission was predicted by insurance type, mental health disorders, and infection type. CVC events were associated with infection type and discharge to home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD was not independently associated with increased 90-day readmission or CVC event risk, but was a significant risk factor for overdose, supporting harm reduction approaches over exclusion from OPAT based on SUD status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"ofaf315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有证据表明类似的结果,但药物使用障碍(SUD)患者通常不接受门诊肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)。我们使用一个全国性的大型索赔数据库对此进行了调查。方法:我们分析了2015-2020年的Merative MarketScan数据,以确定住院后静脉注射万古霉素、达托霉素、萘西林、奥西林或头孢唑林≥7天的成年人。排除患有终末期肾病或艰难梭菌的患者。SUD的定义采用出院前国际疾病分类10-CM代码。通过多变量logistic回归对混杂因素进行调整,比较有和没有SUD的患者在OPAT期间用药过量、中心静脉导管(CVC)事件和OPAT完成后90天全因再入院率。结果:5903例患者中,有18%发生了SUD。这些患者较年轻,男性较少,出院回家的可能性较小。未调整的90天再入院率(40.1%对32.5%,P < 0.001)和用药过量率(1.2%对0.1%,P < 0.001)在SUD组较高,而CVC事件发生率相似(6.5%对5.3%,P = .137)。然而,调整后的分析显示,SUD与再入院(比值比[OR] 1.16, P = 0.067)或CVC事件(比值比[OR] 1.10, P = 0.552)没有显著相关,但与过量用药的较高几率相关(比值比[OR] 6.03, P < 0.001)。再入院是由保险类型、精神健康障碍和感染类型预测的。CVC事件与感染类型和出院有关。结论:SUD与90天再入院或CVC事件风险增加没有独立关联,但是过量用药的重要危险因素,支持减少危害的方法,而不是基于SUD状态排除在OPAT之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Substance Use Disorders on Outcomes of Medically Insured Persons Receiving Multiweek Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: a Claims-based Cohort Study From 2015 to 2020.

Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is often withheld from individuals with substance use disorder (SUD), despite evidence suggesting similar outcomes. We investigated this using a large, nationwide claims database.

Methods: We analyzed Merative MarketScan (2015-2020) data to identify adults treated with intravenous vancomycin, daptomycin, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for ≥7 days after hospitalization. Patients with end-stage renal disease or Clostridioides difficile were excluded. SUD was defined using pre-discharge International Classification of Diseases 10-CM codes. Rates of overdose, central venous catheter (CVC) events during OPAT, and 90-day all-cause readmissions following OPAT completion were compared between patients with and without SUD, adjusting for confounders via multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Among 5903 patients, 18% had SUD. These patients were younger, less often male, and less likely discharged home. Unadjusted rates of 90-day readmission (40.1% vs 32.5%, P < .001) and overdose (1.2% vs 0.1%, P < .001) were higher in the SUD group, whereas CVC event rates were similar (6.5% vs 5.3%, P = .137). However, adjusted analyses revealed SUD was not significantly associated with readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, P = .067) or CVC events (OR 1.10, P = .552), but was associated with higher odds of overdose (OR 6.03, P < .001). Readmission was predicted by insurance type, mental health disorders, and infection type. CVC events were associated with infection type and discharge to home.

Conclusions: SUD was not independently associated with increased 90-day readmission or CVC event risk, but was a significant risk factor for overdose, supporting harm reduction approaches over exclusion from OPAT based on SUD status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信