Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico
{"title":"25号斜尖玻璃体切割探头每分钟切割次数20000刀的临床表现和效果。","authors":"Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico","doi":"10.1177/24741264251338871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (<i>P</i> < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (<i>P</i> < .001) and fewer AEs (<i>P</i> = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251338871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance and Outcomes of a 20 000 Cuts-per-Minute, 25-Gauge, Beveled-Tip Vitrectomy Probe.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251338871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (<i>P</i> < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (<i>P</i> < .001) and fewer AEs (<i>P</i> = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251338871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251338871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251338871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:报告25号,每分钟20000刀(cpm),斜尖玻璃体切割探头系统的临床结果和仪器性能。方法:本前瞻性连续病例系列包括使用2万cpm玻璃体切除术探头系统(2万cpm组)进行初级睫状体部玻璃体切除术(PPV)的眼睛。主要观察指标为手术成功率、手术次数、步数、3个月距离矫正视力(DCVA)、辅助器械的使用和不良事件(ae)。与先前发表的一系列具有10,000 cpm的PPV的眼睛进行了比较分析,斜尖玻璃体切割系统(10,000 cpm组)。结果:共纳入55只眼。所有的眼睛都达到了手术目的。与10000 cpm组相比,20000 cpm组的平均logMAR DCVA从术前的0.96提高到术后(3个月)的0.35 (P P P = 0.044)。结论:20000系统和10000系统对各种玻璃体视网膜适应症的治疗都是安全有效的。20000系统的潜在优势包括减少辅助仪器的使用和降低声发射率。
Clinical Performance and Outcomes of a 20 000 Cuts-per-Minute, 25-Gauge, Beveled-Tip Vitrectomy Probe.
Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. Methods: This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. Results: The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (P < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (P < .001) and fewer AEs (P = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. Conclusions: Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.