25号斜尖玻璃体切割探头每分钟切割次数20000刀的临床表现和效果。

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico
{"title":"25号斜尖玻璃体切割探头每分钟切割次数20000刀的临床表现和效果。","authors":"Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico","doi":"10.1177/24741264251338871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (<i>P</i> < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (<i>P</i> < .001) and fewer AEs (<i>P</i> = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251338871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance and Outcomes of a 20 000 Cuts-per-Minute, 25-Gauge, Beveled-Tip Vitrectomy Probe.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey S Uy, Jose Carlo M Artiaga, Katrina Beatriz M Lim, Pik Sha Chan, Jordan T Famadico\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251338871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (<i>P</i> < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (<i>P</i> < .001) and fewer AEs (<i>P</i> = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251338871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251338871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251338871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告25号,每分钟20000刀(cpm),斜尖玻璃体切割探头系统的临床结果和仪器性能。方法:本前瞻性连续病例系列包括使用2万cpm玻璃体切除术探头系统(2万cpm组)进行初级睫状体部玻璃体切除术(PPV)的眼睛。主要观察指标为手术成功率、手术次数、步数、3个月距离矫正视力(DCVA)、辅助器械的使用和不良事件(ae)。与先前发表的一系列具有10,000 cpm的PPV的眼睛进行了比较分析,斜尖玻璃体切割系统(10,000 cpm组)。结果:共纳入55只眼。所有的眼睛都达到了手术目的。与10000 cpm组相比,20000 cpm组的平均logMAR DCVA从术前的0.96提高到术后(3个月)的0.35 (P P P = 0.044)。结论:20000系统和10000系统对各种玻璃体视网膜适应症的治疗都是安全有效的。20000系统的潜在优势包括减少辅助仪器的使用和降低声发射率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Performance and Outcomes of a 20 000 Cuts-per-Minute, 25-Gauge, Beveled-Tip Vitrectomy Probe.

Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes and instrument performance of a 25-gauge, 20 000 cuts-per-minute (cpm), beveled-tip vitrectomy probe system. Methods: This prospective consecutive case series comprised eyes having primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a 20 000 cpm vitrectomy probe system (20 000 cpm group). The main outcome measures were the rate of success, operative times, number of steps, 3-month distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), ancillary instruments use, and adverse events (AEs). A comparative analysis with the results of a previously published series of eyes that had PPV with a 10 000 cpm, beveled-tip vitrectomy system (10 000 cpm group) was performed. Results: The study included 55 eyes. The surgical objectives were attained in all eyes. The mean logMAR DCVA improved from 0.96 preoperatively to 0.35 postoperatively (at 3 months) (P < .0001). The mean (±SD) total operative time, core vitrectomy time, shave vitrectomy time, and total vitrectomy time was 1964.27 ± 846.92 seconds, 174.87 ± 116.23 seconds, 478.41 ± 387.30 seconds, and 655.60 ± 397.53 seconds, respectively. The mean number of surgical steps was 4.05 ± 1.06 and of ancillary instrument exchanges, 3.23 ± 1.89. The mean postoperative day 1 pain score was 0.16 ± 0.46. Two eyes had elevated intraocular pressure postoperatively and 1 eye had hypotony. There were fewer ancillary instrument exchanges (P < .001) and fewer AEs (P = .044) in the 20 000 cpm group than in the 10 000 cpm group. Conclusions: Both the 20 000 and 10 000 systems are effective and safe for the treatment of various vitreoretinal indications. The potential advantages of the 20 000 system include reduced use of ancillary instrumentation and lower AE rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信