获得兽医护理在加拿大:动物保健组织和干预措施的横断面调查。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316
Quinn Rausch, Maryam Alhamdan, Shane Bateman, Michelle Evason, Valli Fraser-Celin, Courtney Graham, Jamie Saad, Michelle Tuma, Karen Ward, Lauren Van Patter
{"title":"获得兽医护理在加拿大:动物保健组织和干预措施的横断面调查。","authors":"Quinn Rausch, Maryam Alhamdan, Shane Bateman, Michelle Evason, Valli Fraser-Celin, Courtney Graham, Jamie Saad, Michelle Tuma, Karen Ward, Lauren Van Patter","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many Canadians struggle to access healthcare for their animals, but little data is available from the Canadian context on how barriers to care are being addressed, and with what effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this research was to characterize service providing organizations, barrier mitigation tools, community partnerships, and evaluation metrics used by organizations attempting to increase access to animal healthcare in Canada. In this study, we conducted online data mining and a cross-sectional, mixed-methods organizational survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to the survey (<i>N</i> = 97) were received from non-profit organizations (52%), for-profit clinics (38%), and several municipal or governmental services (4%) and educational institutes (5%). Commonly reported tools included no cost or low-cost services, pop-up clinics and providing items to assist with pet transportation, with many other tools (payment plans without a credit check, services in multiple languages, availability of assistive technology) being employed by fewer than 20% of responding organizations. Only 38% of organizations used at least one tool from each of the four categories of barriers. Community involvement in programs ranged from simply accessing the service when it was available (outreach) to giving occasional feedback on their experiences (consulting), being employed or volunteering in program provision (collaborating), and community leadership partnering on initiatives (sharing leadership). Program evaluation most often involved quantitative measures of service usage with fewer organizations formally soliciting feedback from the community or looking at long-term health impacts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Responses demonstrate that organizations employ a wide range of tools to mitigate access to veterinary care barriers primarily along financial and geographical lines, and to a lesser extent with tools targeting cultural or disability-related barriers highlighting the importance of building capacity around addressing multiple intersecting barriers. Study findings provide a baseline characterization of current efforts by Canadian organizations to mitigate barriers to accessing animal healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1581316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to veterinary care in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of animal healthcare organizations and interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Quinn Rausch, Maryam Alhamdan, Shane Bateman, Michelle Evason, Valli Fraser-Celin, Courtney Graham, Jamie Saad, Michelle Tuma, Karen Ward, Lauren Van Patter\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many Canadians struggle to access healthcare for their animals, but little data is available from the Canadian context on how barriers to care are being addressed, and with what effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this research was to characterize service providing organizations, barrier mitigation tools, community partnerships, and evaluation metrics used by organizations attempting to increase access to animal healthcare in Canada. In this study, we conducted online data mining and a cross-sectional, mixed-methods organizational survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to the survey (<i>N</i> = 97) were received from non-profit organizations (52%), for-profit clinics (38%), and several municipal or governmental services (4%) and educational institutes (5%). Commonly reported tools included no cost or low-cost services, pop-up clinics and providing items to assist with pet transportation, with many other tools (payment plans without a credit check, services in multiple languages, availability of assistive technology) being employed by fewer than 20% of responding organizations. Only 38% of organizations used at least one tool from each of the four categories of barriers. Community involvement in programs ranged from simply accessing the service when it was available (outreach) to giving occasional feedback on their experiences (consulting), being employed or volunteering in program provision (collaborating), and community leadership partnering on initiatives (sharing leadership). Program evaluation most often involved quantitative measures of service usage with fewer organizations formally soliciting feedback from the community or looking at long-term health impacts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Responses demonstrate that organizations employ a wide range of tools to mitigate access to veterinary care barriers primarily along financial and geographical lines, and to a lesser extent with tools targeting cultural or disability-related barriers highlighting the importance of building capacity around addressing multiple intersecting barriers. Study findings provide a baseline characterization of current efforts by Canadian organizations to mitigate barriers to accessing animal healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1581316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:许多加拿大人难以为他们的动物获得医疗保健,但从加拿大的情况来看,关于如何解决护理障碍以及产生何种影响的数据很少。方法:本研究的目的是表征服务提供组织、障碍缓解工具、社区伙伴关系和评估指标,这些组织试图在加拿大增加获得动物保健的机会。在这项研究中,我们进行了在线数据挖掘和横断面,混合方法的组织调查。结果:对调查的回复(N = 97)来自非营利组织(52%),营利性诊所(38%),几个市政或政府服务机构(4%)和教育机构(5%)。通常报告的工具包括免费或低成本服务、弹出式诊所和提供物品来协助宠物运输,还有许多其他工具(没有信用检查的付款计划、多语言服务、辅助技术的可用性)被不到20%的回应组织采用。只有38%的组织至少使用了四类障碍中的一种工具。社区参与项目的范围从简单地在有服务的时候获得服务(外联)到偶尔对他们的经验进行反馈(咨询),在项目提供中受雇或志愿服务(合作),以及社区领导在倡议中合作(分享领导权)。方案评估通常涉及服务使用情况的定量测量,很少有组织正式征求社区反馈或关注长期健康影响。讨论:回应表明,组织采用了广泛的工具来减轻获得兽医护理的障碍,主要是在财务和地理方面,并且在较小程度上使用了针对文化或残疾相关障碍的工具,突出了围绕解决多个交叉障碍进行能力建设的重要性。研究结果提供了加拿大组织目前努力的基线特征,以减轻获得动物保健的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to veterinary care in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of animal healthcare organizations and interventions.

Introduction: Many Canadians struggle to access healthcare for their animals, but little data is available from the Canadian context on how barriers to care are being addressed, and with what effects.

Methods: The aim of this research was to characterize service providing organizations, barrier mitigation tools, community partnerships, and evaluation metrics used by organizations attempting to increase access to animal healthcare in Canada. In this study, we conducted online data mining and a cross-sectional, mixed-methods organizational survey.

Results: Responses to the survey (N = 97) were received from non-profit organizations (52%), for-profit clinics (38%), and several municipal or governmental services (4%) and educational institutes (5%). Commonly reported tools included no cost or low-cost services, pop-up clinics and providing items to assist with pet transportation, with many other tools (payment plans without a credit check, services in multiple languages, availability of assistive technology) being employed by fewer than 20% of responding organizations. Only 38% of organizations used at least one tool from each of the four categories of barriers. Community involvement in programs ranged from simply accessing the service when it was available (outreach) to giving occasional feedback on their experiences (consulting), being employed or volunteering in program provision (collaborating), and community leadership partnering on initiatives (sharing leadership). Program evaluation most often involved quantitative measures of service usage with fewer organizations formally soliciting feedback from the community or looking at long-term health impacts.

Discussion: Responses demonstrate that organizations employ a wide range of tools to mitigate access to veterinary care barriers primarily along financial and geographical lines, and to a lesser extent with tools targeting cultural or disability-related barriers highlighting the importance of building capacity around addressing multiple intersecting barriers. Study findings provide a baseline characterization of current efforts by Canadian organizations to mitigate barriers to accessing animal healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信