{"title":"输尿管镜气压弹道碎石与钬激光弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Li-Juan Yao, Hao Yang, Xiao Lv, Sheng-Jing Zhang","doi":"10.62713/aic.3986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 6","pages":"833-840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Managing Ureteral Calculi: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Juan Yao, Hao Yang, Xiao Lv, Sheng-Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 6\",\"pages\":\"833-840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Managing Ureteral Calculi: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Aim: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.
Methods: This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.
Results: After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.
期刊介绍:
Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.