输尿管镜气压弹道碎石与钬激光弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Li-Juan Yao, Hao Yang, Xiao Lv, Sheng-Jing Zhang
{"title":"输尿管镜气压弹道碎石与钬激光弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Li-Juan Yao, Hao Yang, Xiao Lv, Sheng-Jing Zhang","doi":"10.62713/aic.3986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 6","pages":"833-840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Managing Ureteral Calculi: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Juan Yao, Hao Yang, Xiao Lv, Sheng-Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 6\",\"pages\":\"833-840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较输尿管镜下气压碎石术(URPL)与输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术(URHLL)应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法治疗输尿管结石(UC)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性研究招募2019年10月至2024年10月在湖州中医院住院的UC患者288例。根据所接受的手术方式将患者分为URPL组(137例)和urhl组(151例)。收集患者的性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、结石位置、患侧、最大、最小结石直径、肾积水程度等临床资料进行分析。经1:1 PSM匹配后,对比分析两组患者的手术疗效、围手术期参数、氧化应激指标、肾功能指标、并发症发生情况。结果:经PSM后,确定了75对配对,发现两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。URHLL组一次性碎石成功率和结石排出率显著高于对照组(p < 0.05),手术时间显著缩短,术中出血量显著减少,住院时间显著缩短(p < 0.05)。治疗后,URHLL组氧化应激指标升高幅度较小,肾功能指标下降更为明显(p < 0.05),总并发症发生率明显降低(p < 0.05)。两组再手术率和住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:URHLL治疗UC优于URPL,提供更好的碎石清除和结石排出,更有利的围手术期结果,减少氧化应激反应,更好的肾功能保护,并发症发生率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Managing Ureteral Calculi: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Aim: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URPL) and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URHLL) in managing ureteral calculi (UC) using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.

Methods: This retrospective study recruited 288 UC patients admitted to the Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between October 2019 and October 2024. Based on the surgical procedure received, patients were divided into the URPL group (137 cases) and the URHLL group (151 cases). Clinical data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, affected side, maximum and minimum stone diameter, and the degree of hydronephrosis were collected for analysis. After 1:1 PSM matching, the surgical efficacy, perioperative parameters, oxidative stress indicators, renal function markers, and the occurrence of complications were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.

Results: After PSM, 75 matching pairs were identified, and both the patient groups were found comparable for baseline characteristics. The URHLL group demonstrated significantly higher one-time gravel success and stone excretion rates (p < 0.05) and had significantly reduced operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). After treatment, the URHLL group showed a minimal increase in oxidative stress indicators, a more pronounced decrease in renal function markers (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower overall complication rate (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the re-operation rate and hospitalization costs (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: URHLL is superior to URPL in managing UC, providing improved gravel-removal and stone-expulsion, more favorable perioperative outcomes, a reduced oxidative stress response, better renal function protection, and minimal complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信