在手术室无菌手术用品制备过程中,5人对2人对细菌空气污染的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Camilla Wistrand, Bo Söderquist, Ann-Sofie Sundqvist
{"title":"在手术室无菌手术用品制备过程中,5人对2人对细菌空气污染的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Camilla Wistrand, Bo Söderquist, Ann-Sofie Sundqvist","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01589-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) and antimicrobial resistance are a worldwide problem affecting patient safety. It is lacking randomised controlled trials (RCT) regarding how the number of personnel in the operating room (OR) affects the air quality. We aimed to investigate the effect the number of personnel in the OR have on bacterial air contamination during the preparation of sterile surgical goods, to identify the species and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria isolated, and to describe the number of SSIs together with causative microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This RCT used an intervention group in which two individuals prepared the surgical goods and a control group in which five individuals prepared the goods. Bacteria were isolated on aerobic and anaerobic plates, and bacterial growth was measured as colony forming units (CFU). All isolates were typed, and types known to cause SSI were tested for susceptibility to eight antibiotics. Data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results were based on 69 open-heart surgeries and 414 plates. When sterile surgical goods were prepared with two personnel, the median CFU was 2 with an IQR of 2, compared with five personnel, the median CFU was 5, with an IQR of 5 (p < 0.001). The 272 CFU represented 45 different bacterial species, with 38 species isolated in the control group and 21 in the intervention group. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Cutibacterium acnes (82/272, 30%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (36/272, 13%). Of the 36 S. epidermidis isolates, 11 (31%) were drug-resistant, including three multidrug-resistant. One patient in the control group was infected by Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis, neither of which was isolated during the preparation of sterile goods. One patient in the intervention group developed an SSI caused by C. acnes, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii, and S. epidermidis. C. acnes and S. epidermidis were isolated during the preparation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimising the number of personnel in the OR during preparation of sterile surgical goods is important to reduce the bacterial load.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively 15 May 2022 at FoU Sweden (275659) and retrospectively 22 October 2022 at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT05597072).</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of five versus two personnel on bacterial air contamination during preparation of sterile surgical goods in the operating room: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Wistrand, Bo Söderquist, Ann-Sofie Sundqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-025-01589-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) and antimicrobial resistance are a worldwide problem affecting patient safety. It is lacking randomised controlled trials (RCT) regarding how the number of personnel in the operating room (OR) affects the air quality. We aimed to investigate the effect the number of personnel in the OR have on bacterial air contamination during the preparation of sterile surgical goods, to identify the species and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria isolated, and to describe the number of SSIs together with causative microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This RCT used an intervention group in which two individuals prepared the surgical goods and a control group in which five individuals prepared the goods. Bacteria were isolated on aerobic and anaerobic plates, and bacterial growth was measured as colony forming units (CFU). All isolates were typed, and types known to cause SSI were tested for susceptibility to eight antibiotics. Data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results were based on 69 open-heart surgeries and 414 plates. When sterile surgical goods were prepared with two personnel, the median CFU was 2 with an IQR of 2, compared with five personnel, the median CFU was 5, with an IQR of 5 (p < 0.001). The 272 CFU represented 45 different bacterial species, with 38 species isolated in the control group and 21 in the intervention group. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Cutibacterium acnes (82/272, 30%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (36/272, 13%). Of the 36 S. epidermidis isolates, 11 (31%) were drug-resistant, including three multidrug-resistant. One patient in the control group was infected by Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis, neither of which was isolated during the preparation of sterile goods. One patient in the intervention group developed an SSI caused by C. acnes, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii, and S. epidermidis. C. acnes and S. epidermidis were isolated during the preparation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimising the number of personnel in the OR during preparation of sterile surgical goods is important to reduce the bacterial load.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively 15 May 2022 at FoU Sweden (275659) and retrospectively 22 October 2022 at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT05597072).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01589-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01589-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术部位感染(SSI)和抗生素耐药性是影响患者安全的世界性问题。缺乏关于手术室(OR)人员数量如何影响空气质量的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们的目的是调查手术室人员数量对无菌手术用品制备过程中细菌空气污染的影响,确定分离细菌的种类和抗生素敏感性,并描述ssi和致病微生物的数量。方法:本随机对照试验采用干预组2人准备手术用品,对照组5人准备手术用品。在好氧板和厌氧板上分离细菌,以菌落形成单位(CFU)测量细菌的生长。对所有分离株进行分型,并对已知引起SSI的菌株进行8种抗生素的敏感性检测。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:结果基于69例心内直视手术和414块钢板。2人配制无菌手术用品时,CFU的中位数为2,IQR为2;5人配制无菌手术用品时,CFU的中位数为5,IQR为5 (p)。结论:在配制无菌手术用品时,尽量减少手术室人员数量对减少细菌负荷很重要。试验注册:2022年5月15日在FoU Sweden(275659)进行前瞻性注册,2022年10月22日在ClinicalTrials进行回顾性注册。政府(NCT05597072)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of five versus two personnel on bacterial air contamination during preparation of sterile surgical goods in the operating room: a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) and antimicrobial resistance are a worldwide problem affecting patient safety. It is lacking randomised controlled trials (RCT) regarding how the number of personnel in the operating room (OR) affects the air quality. We aimed to investigate the effect the number of personnel in the OR have on bacterial air contamination during the preparation of sterile surgical goods, to identify the species and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria isolated, and to describe the number of SSIs together with causative microorganisms.

Methods: This RCT used an intervention group in which two individuals prepared the surgical goods and a control group in which five individuals prepared the goods. Bacteria were isolated on aerobic and anaerobic plates, and bacterial growth was measured as colony forming units (CFU). All isolates were typed, and types known to cause SSI were tested for susceptibility to eight antibiotics. Data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test.

Results: Results were based on 69 open-heart surgeries and 414 plates. When sterile surgical goods were prepared with two personnel, the median CFU was 2 with an IQR of 2, compared with five personnel, the median CFU was 5, with an IQR of 5 (p < 0.001). The 272 CFU represented 45 different bacterial species, with 38 species isolated in the control group and 21 in the intervention group. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Cutibacterium acnes (82/272, 30%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (36/272, 13%). Of the 36 S. epidermidis isolates, 11 (31%) were drug-resistant, including three multidrug-resistant. One patient in the control group was infected by Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis, neither of which was isolated during the preparation of sterile goods. One patient in the intervention group developed an SSI caused by C. acnes, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii, and S. epidermidis. C. acnes and S. epidermidis were isolated during the preparation.

Conclusions: Minimising the number of personnel in the OR during preparation of sterile surgical goods is important to reduce the bacterial load.

Trial registration: Prospectively 15 May 2022 at FoU Sweden (275659) and retrospectively 22 October 2022 at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT05597072).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信