中年疼痛:美国、欧洲、韩国和墨西哥疼痛报告队列差异的跨国分析。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Orchee L Syed, Frank J Infurna, Yesenia Cruz-Carrillo, Nutifafa E Y Dey, Markus Wettstein, Kevin J Grimm, Margie E Lachman, Denis Gerstorf
{"title":"中年疼痛:美国、欧洲、韩国和墨西哥疼痛报告队列差异的跨国分析。","authors":"Orchee L Syed, Frank J Infurna, Yesenia Cruz-Carrillo, Nutifafa E Y Dey, Markus Wettstein, Kevin J Grimm, Margie E Lachman, Denis Gerstorf","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Middle-aged Americans today are reporting poorer mental, cognitive, and physical health compared to previous cohorts, but this trend has not been consistently observed in other nations. It is an open question whether pain shows similar cohort differences amongst U.S. middle-aged adults compared to other nations. We used harmonized data on pain from nationally representative longitudinal panel surveys from the U.S., 13 European nations (England, Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic regions), South Korea, and Mexico to directly quantify cohort similarities and differences in midlife pain. Results from multilevel models demonstrated that midlife pain is higher amongst later-born cohorts in the U.S. than among earlier-born cohorts. The increased odds for later-born cohorts emerged in the early years of midlife when people are in their early 50s. A similar pattern of increased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in England and Mexico. In contrast, a decreased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe as well as South Korea. Results for pain severity revealed a highly similar pattern. Our discussion focuses on potential explanations, including population-level discrepancies in use and quality of healthcare services and how pain is conceptualized across nations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain During Midlife: A Cross-National Analysis of Cohort Differences in Reports of Pain in the United States, Europe, South Korea, and Mexico.\",\"authors\":\"Orchee L Syed, Frank J Infurna, Yesenia Cruz-Carrillo, Nutifafa E Y Dey, Markus Wettstein, Kevin J Grimm, Margie E Lachman, Denis Gerstorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Middle-aged Americans today are reporting poorer mental, cognitive, and physical health compared to previous cohorts, but this trend has not been consistently observed in other nations. It is an open question whether pain shows similar cohort differences amongst U.S. middle-aged adults compared to other nations. We used harmonized data on pain from nationally representative longitudinal panel surveys from the U.S., 13 European nations (England, Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic regions), South Korea, and Mexico to directly quantify cohort similarities and differences in midlife pain. Results from multilevel models demonstrated that midlife pain is higher amongst later-born cohorts in the U.S. than among earlier-born cohorts. The increased odds for later-born cohorts emerged in the early years of midlife when people are in their early 50s. A similar pattern of increased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in England and Mexico. In contrast, a decreased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe as well as South Korea. Results for pain severity revealed a highly similar pattern. Our discussion focuses on potential explanations, including population-level discrepancies in use and quality of healthcare services and how pain is conceptualized across nations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天的中年美国人报告说,与以前的同龄人相比,他们的精神、认知和身体健康状况都较差,但这一趋势在其他国家并没有得到一致的观察。与其他国家相比,美国中年人的疼痛是否表现出类似的群体差异,这是一个悬而未决的问题。我们使用了来自美国、13个欧洲国家(英格兰、欧洲大陆、地中海和北欧地区)、韩国和墨西哥的具有全国代表性的纵向面板调查的疼痛数据,以直接量化中年疼痛的队列相似性和差异性。多层模型的结果表明,在美国,较晚出生的人群中年疼痛高于较早出生的人群。晚生群体患病几率增加的情况出现在人们50岁出头的中年早期。在英国和墨西哥也观察到,晚生人群报告疼痛的几率增加的类似模式。相比之下,在欧洲大陆、地中海、北欧以及韩国,晚生人群报告疼痛的几率降低。疼痛严重程度的结果显示了高度相似的模式。我们的讨论集中在潜在的解释上,包括医疗服务的使用和质量在人口水平上的差异,以及各国如何将疼痛概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain During Midlife: A Cross-National Analysis of Cohort Differences in Reports of Pain in the United States, Europe, South Korea, and Mexico.

Middle-aged Americans today are reporting poorer mental, cognitive, and physical health compared to previous cohorts, but this trend has not been consistently observed in other nations. It is an open question whether pain shows similar cohort differences amongst U.S. middle-aged adults compared to other nations. We used harmonized data on pain from nationally representative longitudinal panel surveys from the U.S., 13 European nations (England, Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic regions), South Korea, and Mexico to directly quantify cohort similarities and differences in midlife pain. Results from multilevel models demonstrated that midlife pain is higher amongst later-born cohorts in the U.S. than among earlier-born cohorts. The increased odds for later-born cohorts emerged in the early years of midlife when people are in their early 50s. A similar pattern of increased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in England and Mexico. In contrast, a decreased odds of reporting pain for later-born cohorts was observed in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe as well as South Korea. Results for pain severity revealed a highly similar pattern. Our discussion focuses on potential explanations, including population-level discrepancies in use and quality of healthcare services and how pain is conceptualized across nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信