Francisco das Chagas Gomes da Silva Júnior, Priscilla de Souza Almeida, Camila Aparecida de Menezes, Maíra Saldanha Duarte, Thobias Pereira Silva, André Bezerra Dos Santos, Marcelo Zaiat, Renato Carrhá Leitão
{"title":"果蔬废弃物液体部分的厌氧消化:两阶段与单阶段。","authors":"Francisco das Chagas Gomes da Silva Júnior, Priscilla de Souza Almeida, Camila Aparecida de Menezes, Maíra Saldanha Duarte, Thobias Pereira Silva, André Bezerra Dos Santos, Marcelo Zaiat, Renato Carrhá Leitão","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of fruit and vegetable waste to optimize energy recovery through sequential hydrogen and methane production. Two configurations were tested: a single-stage (SS) system using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a two-stage (TS) system combining an anaerobic structured bed reactor (AnStBR) with a UASB reactor. The objective was to identify the most efficient configuration under various organic loading rates (OLR). In the AnStBR, OLR ranged from 40 to 80 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day, while in UASB reactors, the OLR range was from 1.5 to 22.0 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. The TS outperformed the SS in methane production, achieving 3.6 NL CH<sub>4</sub>/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day at an OLR of 22.0 g of COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. It also demonstrated a higher energy potential, generating a total of 1554.9 KJ/day35.7% more efficient than the SS. Additionally, the UASB-TS reactor maintained stability throughout the study, with minimal acid accumulation and an intermediate alkalinity/partial alkalinity ratio (IA:PA) consistently below 0.4, even at elevated OLR. In contrast, the UASB-SS reactor showed signs of acidification at higher OLR. These findings suggest that TS anaerobic digestion offers a more robust and efficient solution for treating high-strength organic waste, enhancing both energy recovery and process stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 22","pages":"22847-22857"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic Digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Two-Stage versus Single-Stage Process.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco das Chagas Gomes da Silva Júnior, Priscilla de Souza Almeida, Camila Aparecida de Menezes, Maíra Saldanha Duarte, Thobias Pereira Silva, André Bezerra Dos Santos, Marcelo Zaiat, Renato Carrhá Leitão\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.5c00073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of fruit and vegetable waste to optimize energy recovery through sequential hydrogen and methane production. Two configurations were tested: a single-stage (SS) system using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a two-stage (TS) system combining an anaerobic structured bed reactor (AnStBR) with a UASB reactor. The objective was to identify the most efficient configuration under various organic loading rates (OLR). In the AnStBR, OLR ranged from 40 to 80 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day, while in UASB reactors, the OLR range was from 1.5 to 22.0 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. The TS outperformed the SS in methane production, achieving 3.6 NL CH<sub>4</sub>/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day at an OLR of 22.0 g of COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. It also demonstrated a higher energy potential, generating a total of 1554.9 KJ/day35.7% more efficient than the SS. Additionally, the UASB-TS reactor maintained stability throughout the study, with minimal acid accumulation and an intermediate alkalinity/partial alkalinity ratio (IA:PA) consistently below 0.4, even at elevated OLR. In contrast, the UASB-SS reactor showed signs of acidification at higher OLR. These findings suggest that TS anaerobic digestion offers a more robust and efficient solution for treating high-strength organic waste, enhancing both energy recovery and process stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 22\",\"pages\":\"22847-22857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了果蔬废弃物液体部分的厌氧消化,通过顺序产氢和产甲烷来优化能量回收。测试了两种配置:使用上流式厌氧污泥毯(UASB)反应器的单级(SS)系统和结合厌氧结构床反应器(AnStBR)和UASB反应器的两级(TS)系统。目的是确定在不同有机负载率(OLR)下最有效的配置。在AnStBR反应器中,OLR为40 ~ 80 g COD/Lreactor·d,而在UASB反应器中,OLR为1.5 ~ 22.0 g COD/Lreactor·d。在甲烷产量方面,TS优于SS,达到3.6 NL CH4/Lreactor·d, OLR为22.0 g COD/Lreactor·d。它还显示出更高的能量潜力,产生1554.9 KJ/天比SS效率高35.7%。此外,UASB-TS反应器在整个研究过程中保持稳定,酸积累最少,中间碱度/部分碱度比(IA:PA)始终低于0.4,即使在OLR升高时也是如此。相比之下,UASB-SS反应器在较高的OLR下显示出酸化迹象。这些发现表明,TS厌氧消化为处理高强度有机废物提供了更强大和有效的解决方案,提高了能量回收率和过程稳定性。
Anaerobic Digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Two-Stage versus Single-Stage Process.
This study evaluated the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of fruit and vegetable waste to optimize energy recovery through sequential hydrogen and methane production. Two configurations were tested: a single-stage (SS) system using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a two-stage (TS) system combining an anaerobic structured bed reactor (AnStBR) with a UASB reactor. The objective was to identify the most efficient configuration under various organic loading rates (OLR). In the AnStBR, OLR ranged from 40 to 80 g COD/Lreactor·day, while in UASB reactors, the OLR range was from 1.5 to 22.0 g COD/Lreactor·day. The TS outperformed the SS in methane production, achieving 3.6 NL CH4/Lreactor·day at an OLR of 22.0 g of COD/Lreactor·day. It also demonstrated a higher energy potential, generating a total of 1554.9 KJ/day35.7% more efficient than the SS. Additionally, the UASB-TS reactor maintained stability throughout the study, with minimal acid accumulation and an intermediate alkalinity/partial alkalinity ratio (IA:PA) consistently below 0.4, even at elevated OLR. In contrast, the UASB-SS reactor showed signs of acidification at higher OLR. These findings suggest that TS anaerobic digestion offers a more robust and efficient solution for treating high-strength organic waste, enhancing both energy recovery and process stability.
ACS OmegaChemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍:
ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.