印度尼西亚、孟加拉国和塞内加尔的大米自给倡议:比较分析

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jarvis Fisher, Jenny Goldstein, Anjana Ramkumar
{"title":"印度尼西亚、孟加拉国和塞内加尔的大米自给倡议:比较分析","authors":"Jarvis Fisher,&nbsp;Jenny Goldstein,&nbsp;Anjana Ramkumar","doi":"10.1111/dech.12878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"56 2","pages":"229-253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rice Self-sufficiency Initiatives in Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jarvis Fisher,&nbsp;Jenny Goldstein,&nbsp;Anjana Ramkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dech.12878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development and Change\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"229-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对印度尼西亚、孟加拉国和塞内加尔的比较分析,考察了全球南方国家将大米自给自足作为一项政策目标的持久性。这篇文章认为,大米自给自足的可延展性使得这一政策概念在发展模式的巨大转变中幸存下来,同时服务于不同的国家目标。通过对三个具有不同殖民历史、农业生态条件和发展轨迹的国家案例的考察,本文探讨了大米自给自足的灵活性如何使国家能够在保证农村自治的同时管理扩大领土控制的竞争压力,在深化全球市场一体化的同时保持民族主义合法性,以及平衡城市消费者需求和农村生产者利益。这种灵活性既有助于解释粮食自给自足概念的持久性,也有助于解释从保护主义和国家主导的农业发展到私有化和贸易自由化等以其名义推行的相互矛盾的政策。对大米自给自足的持久性的更深入理解反过来又阐明了国家代理人和政策制定者如何利用灵活的政策概念来应对竞争压力,同时保持政治合法性的更广泛模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rice Self-sufficiency Initiatives in Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal: A Comparative Analysis

This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信