{"title":"印度尼西亚、孟加拉国和塞内加尔的大米自给倡议:比较分析","authors":"Jarvis Fisher, Jenny Goldstein, Anjana Ramkumar","doi":"10.1111/dech.12878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"56 2","pages":"229-253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rice Self-sufficiency Initiatives in Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jarvis Fisher, Jenny Goldstein, Anjana Ramkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dech.12878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development and Change\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"229-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rice Self-sufficiency Initiatives in Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal: A Comparative Analysis
This article examines the persistence of rice self-sufficiency as a policy goal across the Global South through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh and Senegal. The article argues that the malleable nature of rice self-sufficiency has allowed this policy concept to survive dramatic shifts in development paradigms while serving diverse state objectives. Through the examination of three country cases with distinct colonial histories, agroecological conditions and development trajectories, the article explores how the flexibility of rice self-sufficiency enables states to manage the competing pressures of extending territorial control while promising rural autonomy, maintaining nationalist legitimacy while deepening global market integration, and balancing urban consumer demands with rural producer interests. This flexibility helps to explain both the durability of the concept of food self-sufficiency and the contradictory policies pursued in its name, from protectionism and state-led agricultural development to privatization and trade liberalization. A deeper understanding of the persistence of rice self-sufficiency in turn illuminates broader patterns in how state agents and policy makers deploy flexible policy concepts to navigate competing pressures while maintaining political legitimacy.
期刊介绍:
Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners