理解信任动力学:他人特质对青少年信任行为的情境依赖效应及认知反思

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Mingping Li, Xiaofei Wang, Yanjie Su
{"title":"理解信任动力学:他人特质对青少年信任行为的情境依赖效应及认知反思","authors":"Mingping Li,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang,&nbsp;Yanjie Su","doi":"10.1111/jora.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People rely on their impression of trustworthiness and competence that are formed while interacting with others. We report two studies that explore the interplay between trait perception, cognitive reflection, and trust reciprocity among adolescents across various contexts. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 243, ages 13–15) used a correlational design to link cognitive reflection with trust preferences. Study 2 employed an experimental design to establish causality: sub-study 2a (<i>n</i> = 113) and sub-study 2b (<i>n</i> = 108) introduced time constraints and cognitive load to induce intuitive decision-making. Our results show that adolescents prioritize competence in knowledge-based and economic contexts, and warmth in communicative scenarios. Cognitive reflection attenuates preference for warmth, while preference for competence remains relatively stable. These findings underscore the role of cognitive and situational factors in trust dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding trust dynamics: Context-dependent effects of others' traits and cognitive reflection on adolescent trust behavior\",\"authors\":\"Mingping Li,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang,&nbsp;Yanjie Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jora.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>People rely on their impression of trustworthiness and competence that are formed while interacting with others. We report two studies that explore the interplay between trait perception, cognitive reflection, and trust reciprocity among adolescents across various contexts. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 243, ages 13–15) used a correlational design to link cognitive reflection with trust preferences. Study 2 employed an experimental design to establish causality: sub-study 2a (<i>n</i> = 113) and sub-study 2b (<i>n</i> = 108) introduced time constraints and cognitive load to induce intuitive decision-making. Our results show that adolescents prioritize competence in knowledge-based and economic contexts, and warmth in communicative scenarios. Cognitive reflection attenuates preference for warmth, while preference for competence remains relatively stable. These findings underscore the role of cognitive and situational factors in trust dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们依赖于他们在与他人互动时形成的可信赖和能力的印象。我们报告了两项研究,探讨了不同情境下青少年特质感知、认知反射和信任互惠之间的相互作用。研究1 (N = 243,年龄13-15岁)采用相关设计将认知反射与信任偏好联系起来。研究2采用实验设计建立因果关系:子研究2a (n = 113)和子研究2b (n = 108)引入时间约束和认知负荷诱导直觉决策。我们的研究结果表明,青少年在知识和经济情境中优先考虑能力,而在交际情境中优先考虑温暖。认知反射减弱了对温暖的偏好,而对能力的偏好保持相对稳定。这些发现强调了认知和情境因素在信任动力学中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding trust dynamics: Context-dependent effects of others' traits and cognitive reflection on adolescent trust behavior

People rely on their impression of trustworthiness and competence that are formed while interacting with others. We report two studies that explore the interplay between trait perception, cognitive reflection, and trust reciprocity among adolescents across various contexts. Study 1 (N = 243, ages 13–15) used a correlational design to link cognitive reflection with trust preferences. Study 2 employed an experimental design to establish causality: sub-study 2a (n = 113) and sub-study 2b (n = 108) introduced time constraints and cognitive load to induce intuitive decision-making. Our results show that adolescents prioritize competence in knowledge-based and economic contexts, and warmth in communicative scenarios. Cognitive reflection attenuates preference for warmth, while preference for competence remains relatively stable. These findings underscore the role of cognitive and situational factors in trust dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信