食肉动物资源补贴,以支持捕食者的重新引入和减轻对重新引入猎物的威胁

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Ben Stepkovitch, Katherine Tuft, Nathan Manders, Katherine E. Moseby
{"title":"食肉动物资源补贴,以支持捕食者的重新引入和减轻对重新引入猎物的威胁","authors":"Ben Stepkovitch,&nbsp;Katherine Tuft,&nbsp;Nathan Manders,&nbsp;Katherine E. Moseby","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (<i>Dasyurus geoffroii</i>), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for &gt;2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non-significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve-wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post-release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey\",\"authors\":\"Ben Stepkovitch,&nbsp;Katherine Tuft,&nbsp;Nathan Manders,&nbsp;Katherine E. Moseby\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (<i>Dasyurus geoffroii</i>), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for &gt;2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non-significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve-wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post-release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对受威胁的猎物物种的潜在风险是将食肉动物重新引入围栏或岛屿保护保护区的实际或感知障碍。重新引入的食肉动物的补充喂养是一种工具,可以增加迁移的成功率,并在关键时刻减轻猎物种群的捕食压力。在2020-2022年期间,我们在澳大利亚围栏保护区的尸体喂食站周围监测了本地猎物的活动,以及重新引入的捕食者西部袋鼬(Dasyurus geoffroii)的活动和饮食。在21个月的时间里,我们比较了在操纵尸体存在(增加、移除或不存在尸体)的地点,捕食者和猎物的相机检测结果。当添加尸体时,喂食站周围的Quoll活动和检测增加,而小型啮齿动物和兔耳袋狸的活动减少。在有尸体的地点发现的土拨鼠数量也有所减少,但仅在提供了2年补充尸体的地点。在觅食点附近收集的粪便中,有显著(啮齿动物)和不显著(兔耳袋狸、土拨鼠)的猎物剩余量减少的趋势,表明猎物行为回避而不是在觅食点增加狩猎。相比之下,爬行动物(也是袋鼬的猎物)在喂食站附近的粪便中所占比例更高,这表明爬行动物被吸引到喂食站,在那里它们被袋鼬捕食。我们的研究结果,结合之前在保护区范围内证明的哺乳动物猎物丰度的减少,表明屠体补贴不会提高局部尺度的狩猎,但可以维持或增加大尺度的捕食者密度。在开展进一步的工作之前,我们建议在放生后的一段时间内,以及在资源短缺(如干旱)期间,只间歇性地使用喂食站,以帮助固定和适应放生地点的捕食者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey

Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey

Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey

Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey

Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey

The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (Dasyurus geoffroii), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for >2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non-significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve-wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post-release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信