利用公众参与和基因标记重获数据来估计城市驼鹿的人口统计

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
David T. Saalfeld, Cory J. Stantorf, D. Battle, Andrew W. Barclay, Sandra L. Talbot, George K. Sage, Sean Farley
{"title":"利用公众参与和基因标记重获数据来估计城市驼鹿的人口统计","authors":"David T. Saalfeld,&nbsp;Cory J. Stantorf,&nbsp;D. Battle,&nbsp;Andrew W. Barclay,&nbsp;Sandra L. Talbot,&nbsp;George K. Sage,&nbsp;Sean Farley","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective wildlife management often requires data on population size, survival, sex ratios, and site fidelity; however, obtaining these metrics can be difficult in areas or years when traditional techniques such as aerial surveys are ineffective or prohibitive, resulting in a need for alternative sampling techniques. In this study, we developed a methodology for estimating demographics of an urban moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) population by combining reports from the public and genetic mark-recapture data. From 2018–2021, we elicited the public's help during a 3-day period in late February to locate moose for biopsy sampling in Anchorage, Alaska, USA. Each year, &gt;800 reports from the public allowed us to obtain 891 biopsy samples. Combined with an additional 493 samples obtained from roadkilled or harvested moose, we identified 837 unique individuals with 433 recapture events (recapture rate = 59%). Using genetic mark-recapture techniques, we estimated there to be 306 (95% CI = 222–390) moose within Anchorage, a relatively high density (1.5 moose/km<sup>2</sup>) suggesting urban areas may have perceived advantages to moose such as reduced predation risks, greater foraging opportunities, or lower snow depths on plowed roads and groomed trails. Additionally, moose exhibited high winter site fidelity and moved &lt;3.0 km between captures on average. However, survival rates of adults (73%; 95% CI = 60–83%) and calves (i.e., individuals surviving from 9 months of age to the subsequent February survey; 48%; 95% CI = 32–65%) were low, suggesting urban areas may act as an ecological trap due to mortality risks from vehicle collisions. This study showed that by eliciting public participation in an urban environment, genetic mark-recapture was a feasible alternative to traditional aerial surveys to estimate moose population demographics, a technique that could easily be adapted to other urban areas and wildlife species.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics\",\"authors\":\"David T. Saalfeld,&nbsp;Cory J. Stantorf,&nbsp;D. Battle,&nbsp;Andrew W. Barclay,&nbsp;Sandra L. Talbot,&nbsp;George K. Sage,&nbsp;Sean Farley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Effective wildlife management often requires data on population size, survival, sex ratios, and site fidelity; however, obtaining these metrics can be difficult in areas or years when traditional techniques such as aerial surveys are ineffective or prohibitive, resulting in a need for alternative sampling techniques. In this study, we developed a methodology for estimating demographics of an urban moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) population by combining reports from the public and genetic mark-recapture data. From 2018–2021, we elicited the public's help during a 3-day period in late February to locate moose for biopsy sampling in Anchorage, Alaska, USA. Each year, &gt;800 reports from the public allowed us to obtain 891 biopsy samples. Combined with an additional 493 samples obtained from roadkilled or harvested moose, we identified 837 unique individuals with 433 recapture events (recapture rate = 59%). Using genetic mark-recapture techniques, we estimated there to be 306 (95% CI = 222–390) moose within Anchorage, a relatively high density (1.5 moose/km<sup>2</sup>) suggesting urban areas may have perceived advantages to moose such as reduced predation risks, greater foraging opportunities, or lower snow depths on plowed roads and groomed trails. Additionally, moose exhibited high winter site fidelity and moved &lt;3.0 km between captures on average. However, survival rates of adults (73%; 95% CI = 60–83%) and calves (i.e., individuals surviving from 9 months of age to the subsequent February survey; 48%; 95% CI = 32–65%) were low, suggesting urban areas may act as an ecological trap due to mortality risks from vehicle collisions. This study showed that by eliciting public participation in an urban environment, genetic mark-recapture was a feasible alternative to traditional aerial surveys to estimate moose population demographics, a technique that could easily be adapted to other urban areas and wildlife species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的野生动物管理通常需要有关种群规模、存活率、性别比例和地点保真度的数据;然而,在某些地区或年份,当传统技术(如航空测量)无效或令人望而却步时,获得这些指标可能会很困难,从而需要替代采样技术。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种方法来估计城市驼鹿(Alces Alces)种群的人口统计数据,该方法结合了来自公众和遗传标记再捕获数据的报告。从2018年到2021年,我们在2月下旬的3天时间里获得了公众的帮助,在美国阿拉斯加州安克雷奇寻找驼鹿进行活检取样。每年,来自公众的800份报告使我们能够获得891份活检样本。结合从道路死亡或收获的驼鹿中获得的额外493个样本,我们确定了837个独特的个体,有433个再捕获事件(再捕获率= 59%)。利用遗传标记-再捕获技术,我们估计在安克雷奇有306头(95% CI = 222-390)驼鹿,相对较高的密度(1.5头/平方公里)表明城市地区可能对驼鹿有明显的优势,如降低捕食风险,更多的觅食机会,或在犁耕的道路和修剪过的小径上积雪深度较低。此外,驼鹿表现出较高的冬季地点保真度,捕获之间平均移动了3.0公里。然而,成人的存活率(73%;95% CI = 60-83%)和小牛(即从9个月大存活到随后的2月调查的个体;48%;95% CI = 32-65%)较低,表明由于车辆碰撞的死亡风险,城市地区可能成为生态陷阱。这项研究表明,通过在城市环境中吸引公众参与,基因标记再捕获是一种可行的替代方法,可以替代传统的空中调查来估计驼鹿种群的人口特征,这种技术很容易适应其他城市地区和野生动物物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics

Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics

Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics

Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics

Using public participation and genetic mark-recapture data to estimate urban moose population demographics

Effective wildlife management often requires data on population size, survival, sex ratios, and site fidelity; however, obtaining these metrics can be difficult in areas or years when traditional techniques such as aerial surveys are ineffective or prohibitive, resulting in a need for alternative sampling techniques. In this study, we developed a methodology for estimating demographics of an urban moose (Alces alces) population by combining reports from the public and genetic mark-recapture data. From 2018–2021, we elicited the public's help during a 3-day period in late February to locate moose for biopsy sampling in Anchorage, Alaska, USA. Each year, >800 reports from the public allowed us to obtain 891 biopsy samples. Combined with an additional 493 samples obtained from roadkilled or harvested moose, we identified 837 unique individuals with 433 recapture events (recapture rate = 59%). Using genetic mark-recapture techniques, we estimated there to be 306 (95% CI = 222–390) moose within Anchorage, a relatively high density (1.5 moose/km2) suggesting urban areas may have perceived advantages to moose such as reduced predation risks, greater foraging opportunities, or lower snow depths on plowed roads and groomed trails. Additionally, moose exhibited high winter site fidelity and moved <3.0 km between captures on average. However, survival rates of adults (73%; 95% CI = 60–83%) and calves (i.e., individuals surviving from 9 months of age to the subsequent February survey; 48%; 95% CI = 32–65%) were low, suggesting urban areas may act as an ecological trap due to mortality risks from vehicle collisions. This study showed that by eliciting public participation in an urban environment, genetic mark-recapture was a feasible alternative to traditional aerial surveys to estimate moose population demographics, a technique that could easily be adapted to other urban areas and wildlife species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信