低相对坐立比与不良健康结果的发展相关:一项5年纵向研究

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Mikel Garcia-Aguirre, Ivan Baltasar-Fernandez, Julian Alcazar, Ana Alfaro-Acha, F. A. Bareiro-Quiñonez, Ignacio Ara, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas, Francisco J. Garcia-Garcia, Luis M. Alegre
{"title":"低相对坐立比与不良健康结果的发展相关:一项5年纵向研究","authors":"Mikel Garcia-Aguirre,&nbsp;Ivan Baltasar-Fernandez,&nbsp;Julian Alcazar,&nbsp;Ana Alfaro-Acha,&nbsp;F. A. Bareiro-Quiñonez,&nbsp;Ignacio Ara,&nbsp;Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas,&nbsp;Francisco J. Garcia-Garcia,&nbsp;Luis M. Alegre","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Relative sit-to-stand (STS) power has emerged as a key biomarker of aging due to its strong association with adverse health outcomes such as frailty or disability. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between low baseline relative STS power with the development of adverse health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 839 community-dwelling older adults (65–91 years; 42% men) from the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging were assessed at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up. Relative STS power was assessed using the 30-s STS test and Alcazar's equation. Adverse conditions considered encompassed frailty (evaluated using the frailty trait scale 5 [FTS5] or frailty phenotype [FP]), disability in basic (BADL; Barthel index) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL; Lawton and Brody scale), cognitive impairment (mini-mental state examination), depression (geriatric depression scale) and medication use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At baseline, people with low relative STS power (461 participants) had significantly higher FTS5 (+5.9 points), FP (+0.56 criteria), disability in BADL (−0.1 points) and IADL (−0.7 points), cognitive impairment (−1.3 points) and medication use (+0.9 medications) than older adults with normal relative STS power (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at baseline in GDS (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Low baseline relative STS power was significantly associated with the incidence of frailty FTS5 (OR [95% CI] = 2.51 [1.26–5.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.009), disability in BADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.13–2.56]; <i>p</i> = 0.011) and IADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.79 [1.06–3.02]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) and increased medication use (OR [95% CI] = 1.51 [1.10–2.07]; <i>p</i> = 0.011) during the follow-up. No association was found with the incidence of frailty by FP (OR [95% CI] = 1.71 [0.75–3.93]; <i>p</i> = 0.202), depression (OR [95% CI] = 1.29 [0.85–1.98]; <i>p</i> = 0.236) or cognitive impairment (OR [95% CI] = 1.38 [0.86–2.21]; <i>p</i> = 0.178).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Participants with low relative STS power exhibited worse baseline and 5-year follow-up values in frailty, BADL and IADL disability, cognitive impairment and medication intake. Low relative STS power was also associated with a higher probability of future frailty, disability in BADL and IADL and increased medication use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13852","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Relative Sit-to-Stand Power Is Associated With the Development of Adverse Health Outcomes: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study\",\"authors\":\"Mikel Garcia-Aguirre,&nbsp;Ivan Baltasar-Fernandez,&nbsp;Julian Alcazar,&nbsp;Ana Alfaro-Acha,&nbsp;F. A. Bareiro-Quiñonez,&nbsp;Ignacio Ara,&nbsp;Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas,&nbsp;Francisco J. Garcia-Garcia,&nbsp;Luis M. Alegre\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcsm.13852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Relative sit-to-stand (STS) power has emerged as a key biomarker of aging due to its strong association with adverse health outcomes such as frailty or disability. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between low baseline relative STS power with the development of adverse health outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 839 community-dwelling older adults (65–91 years; 42% men) from the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging were assessed at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up. Relative STS power was assessed using the 30-s STS test and Alcazar's equation. Adverse conditions considered encompassed frailty (evaluated using the frailty trait scale 5 [FTS5] or frailty phenotype [FP]), disability in basic (BADL; Barthel index) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL; Lawton and Brody scale), cognitive impairment (mini-mental state examination), depression (geriatric depression scale) and medication use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>At baseline, people with low relative STS power (461 participants) had significantly higher FTS5 (+5.9 points), FP (+0.56 criteria), disability in BADL (−0.1 points) and IADL (−0.7 points), cognitive impairment (−1.3 points) and medication use (+0.9 medications) than older adults with normal relative STS power (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at baseline in GDS (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Low baseline relative STS power was significantly associated with the incidence of frailty FTS5 (OR [95% CI] = 2.51 [1.26–5.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.009), disability in BADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.13–2.56]; <i>p</i> = 0.011) and IADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.79 [1.06–3.02]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) and increased medication use (OR [95% CI] = 1.51 [1.10–2.07]; <i>p</i> = 0.011) during the follow-up. No association was found with the incidence of frailty by FP (OR [95% CI] = 1.71 [0.75–3.93]; <i>p</i> = 0.202), depression (OR [95% CI] = 1.29 [0.85–1.98]; <i>p</i> = 0.236) or cognitive impairment (OR [95% CI] = 1.38 [0.86–2.21]; <i>p</i> = 0.178).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants with low relative STS power exhibited worse baseline and 5-year follow-up values in frailty, BADL and IADL disability, cognitive impairment and medication intake. Low relative STS power was also associated with a higher probability of future frailty, disability in BADL and IADL and increased medication use.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13852\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13852\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:相对坐立能力(STS)已成为衰老的关键生物标志物,因为它与虚弱或残疾等不良健康结果密切相关。因此,本研究旨在评估低基线相对STS能力与不良健康结局发展之间的关系。方法839例社区居住老年人(65 ~ 91岁;来自托莱多健康老龄化研究的42%(男性)在基线和5年随访后进行评估。采用30s STS测试和Alcazar方程评估相对STS功率。考虑的不利条件包括虚弱(使用虚弱性状量表5 [FTS5]或虚弱表型[FP]进行评估),基本残疾(BADL;Barthel指数)和日常生活工具活动(IADL);劳顿和布罗迪量表),认知障碍(迷你精神状态检查),抑郁症(老年抑郁症量表)和药物使用。结果在基线时,相对STS能力低的人(461名参与者)的FTS5(+5.9分)、FP(+0.56分)、BADL(- 0.1分)和IADL(- 0.7分)残疾、认知障碍(- 1.3分)和药物使用(+0.9分)明显高于相对STS能力正常的老年人(均p <; 0.05)。相比之下,GDS在基线时无显著差异(p > 0.05)。低基线相对STS功率与脆性FTS5发生率显著相关(OR [95% CI] = 2.51 [1.26-5.03];p = 0.009),残疾BADL(或(95%置信区间)= 1.70 (1.13 - -2.56);p = 0.011)和IADL(或(95%置信区间)= 1.79 (1.06 - -3.02);p = 0.030)和用药增加(OR [95% CI] = 1.51 [1.10-2.07];P = 0.011)。未发现FP与虚弱发生率相关(OR [95% CI] = 1.71 [0.75-3.93];p = 0.202)、抑郁(或(95%置信区间)= 1.29 (0.85 - -1.98);p = 0.236)或认知障碍(or [95% CI] = 1.38 [0.86-2.21];p = 0.178)。结论相对STS功率低的受试者在虚弱、BADL和IADL残疾、认知障碍和药物摄入方面的基线和5年随访值较差。相对低的STS功率也与未来虚弱、BADL和IADL残疾以及药物使用增加的可能性较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low Relative Sit-to-Stand Power Is Associated With the Development of Adverse Health Outcomes: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study

Low Relative Sit-to-Stand Power Is Associated With the Development of Adverse Health Outcomes: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study

Background

Relative sit-to-stand (STS) power has emerged as a key biomarker of aging due to its strong association with adverse health outcomes such as frailty or disability. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between low baseline relative STS power with the development of adverse health outcomes.

Methods

A total of 839 community-dwelling older adults (65–91 years; 42% men) from the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging were assessed at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up. Relative STS power was assessed using the 30-s STS test and Alcazar's equation. Adverse conditions considered encompassed frailty (evaluated using the frailty trait scale 5 [FTS5] or frailty phenotype [FP]), disability in basic (BADL; Barthel index) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL; Lawton and Brody scale), cognitive impairment (mini-mental state examination), depression (geriatric depression scale) and medication use.

Results

At baseline, people with low relative STS power (461 participants) had significantly higher FTS5 (+5.9 points), FP (+0.56 criteria), disability in BADL (−0.1 points) and IADL (−0.7 points), cognitive impairment (−1.3 points) and medication use (+0.9 medications) than older adults with normal relative STS power (all p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at baseline in GDS (p > 0.05). Low baseline relative STS power was significantly associated with the incidence of frailty FTS5 (OR [95% CI] = 2.51 [1.26–5.03]; p = 0.009), disability in BADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.13–2.56]; p = 0.011) and IADL (OR [95% CI] = 1.79 [1.06–3.02]; p = 0.030) and increased medication use (OR [95% CI] = 1.51 [1.10–2.07]; p = 0.011) during the follow-up. No association was found with the incidence of frailty by FP (OR [95% CI] = 1.71 [0.75–3.93]; p = 0.202), depression (OR [95% CI] = 1.29 [0.85–1.98]; p = 0.236) or cognitive impairment (OR [95% CI] = 1.38 [0.86–2.21]; p = 0.178).

Conclusion

Participants with low relative STS power exhibited worse baseline and 5-year follow-up values in frailty, BADL and IADL disability, cognitive impairment and medication intake. Low relative STS power was also associated with a higher probability of future frailty, disability in BADL and IADL and increased medication use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信