一个全面的电子高等教育机构认证模式的清单:综合标准和专家的观点

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani, Zainab Sadat Mostafavi, Hayden Godfrey
{"title":"一个全面的电子高等教育机构认证模式的清单:综合标准和专家的观点","authors":"Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani,&nbsp;Zainab Sadat Mostafavi,&nbsp;Hayden Godfrey","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE-HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a deductive meta-synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE-HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all-encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high-quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE-HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student-centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE-HEIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani,&nbsp;Zainab Sadat Mostafavi,&nbsp;Hayden Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hequ.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE-HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a deductive meta-synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE-HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all-encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high-quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE-HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student-centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE-HEIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是为高等教育机构(OEDE-HEIs)的在线、电子和远程教育开发一个全面的认证模式。OEDE在全球流行的激增需要一个改进的认证框架,以满足独特的机构需求。本研究采用混合方法,将现有文献的演绎综合与专家意见的归纳定性分析相结合。目标是将各种认证标准整合到为OEDE-HEIs量身定制的有凝聚力的清单中,确保在快速变化的教育环境中具有稳健性和相关性。该研究确定了5个主要主题和45个次要主题,包括组织结构、教育维度、研究整合、支持系统和技术基础设施。主要发现包括组织适应性、情感和行政支持的重要性,以及技术对OEDE各个方面的关键影响。这导致了一份全新的、包罗万象的认证清单的诞生,为高质量、反应迅速的在线教育提供了一个全面的基本因素。此外,该研究还强调了潜在的局限性,包括来自专家反馈的区域偏见和技术进步的动态性。对未来研究的建议包括拓宽专家视角,定期更新认证标准,以及审查实际应用挑战。这项研究为OEDE-HEIs认证提供了一个详细的框架,促进了一种更全面、适应性更强、以学生为中心的方法,从而为该领域做出了贡献。其影响延伸到从业人员、政策制定者和教育工作者,指导OEDE-HEIs的业务战略、政策制定和教育交付的加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives

This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE-HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a deductive meta-synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE-HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all-encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high-quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE-HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student-centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE-HEIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信