J.A. Memon , Z.A. Memon , M.S. Shah , M.S. Chandio , A. Baloch
{"title":"检查放射风险感知在诊断成像程序患者决策中的作用:来自不同人群的多中心研究的见解","authors":"J.A. Memon , Z.A. Memon , M.S. Shah , M.S. Chandio , A. Baloch","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of radiation risk perception in patient decision-making for diagnostic imaging procedures: Insights from a multi-centre study across diverse populations\",\"authors\":\"J.A. Memon , Z.A. Memon , M.S. Shah , M.S. Chandio , A. Baloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500149X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500149X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the role of radiation risk perception in patient decision-making for diagnostic imaging procedures: Insights from a multi-centre study across diverse populations
Introduction
Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.
Methods
This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.
Results
Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).
Conclusion
The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.
Implications for practice
This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.