检查放射风险感知在诊断成像程序患者决策中的作用:来自不同人群的多中心研究的见解

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
J.A. Memon , Z.A. Memon , M.S. Shah , M.S. Chandio , A. Baloch
{"title":"检查放射风险感知在诊断成像程序患者决策中的作用:来自不同人群的多中心研究的见解","authors":"J.A. Memon ,&nbsp;Z.A. Memon ,&nbsp;M.S. Shah ,&nbsp;M.S. Chandio ,&nbsp;A. Baloch","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of radiation risk perception in patient decision-making for diagnostic imaging procedures: Insights from a multi-centre study across diverse populations\",\"authors\":\"J.A. Memon ,&nbsp;Z.A. Memon ,&nbsp;M.S. Shah ,&nbsp;M.S. Chandio ,&nbsp;A. Baloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500149X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500149X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于电离辐射的诊断成像对现代医疗至关重要,并具有潜在危害,包括累积较高剂量的辐射诱发癌症的风险。患者的感知显著影响与诊断成像程序相关的决策。尽管信息和技术取得了进步,但知识差距和沟通障碍仍然存在,导致误解和焦虑。方法本研究是一项多中心横断面研究,对628例患者对辐射风险的认识、认知和态度进行评估。分层随机抽样从城乡医疗机构中选取参试对象。从26个保健中心(7个城市,19个农村)收集数据,以确保多样化的覆盖范围。一份结构化问卷,包括封闭式和李克特量表问题,用于检查患者背景,辐射发射方法的知识,对医疗保健提供者的信任以及影响决策的因素。结果结果显示患者的知识水平存在差异。98.7%的人正确地识别出x射线是辐射源,而只有54.3%的人识别出CT扫描。误解是常见的,9.2%的人认为核磁共振成像,3.8%的人认为超声波发射电离辐射。此外,82.3%的答复者认为,医疗专业人员没有充分传达与辐射有关的风险。农村参与者报告了明显更高的焦虑(平均得分:农村= 3.2,城市= 2.6)。结论本研究强调了加强辐射危害患者教育和医师沟通的必要性。解决误解和促进知情决策可以增强患者的信心和优化利用诊断成像。本研究强调了全面的患者教育、标准化的提供者沟通和知情同意实践在解决知识差距和减轻辐射相关恐惧方面的重要性。社区外展和远程医疗可以帮助解决卫生知识普及方面的差距,而数字技术和医院主导的咨询可以促进更好地了解患者的辐射风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the role of radiation risk perception in patient decision-making for diagnostic imaging procedures: Insights from a multi-centre study across diverse populations

Introduction

Ionising radiation-based diagnostic imaging is crucial for modern medical care and carries potential hazards, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer at cumulative higher doses. Patients' perceptions significantly influence decisions related to diagnostic imaging procedures. Despite advancements in information and technology, knowledge gaps and communication barriers persist, leading to misconceptions and anxieties.

Methods

This multi-centre cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of 628 patients regarding radiation risks. Stratified random sampling selected participants from urban and rural medical facilities. Data were collected from 26 healthcare centres (7 urban, 19 rural) to ensure diverse coverage. A structured questionnaire, comprising closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was used to examine patient backgrounds, knowledge of radiation-emitting methods, trust in healthcare providers, and factors influencing decision-making.

Results

Results showed varying patient knowledge. While 98.7 % correctly identified X-rays as a source of radiation, only 54.3 % recognised CT scans. Misconceptions were common, with 9.2 % believing that MRI and 3.8 % believing that ultrasound emits ionising radiation. Additionally, 82.3 % of respondents felt that medical professionals did not adequately communicate the risks associated with radiation. Rural participants reported significantly higher anxiety (mean score: rural = 3.2, urban = 2.6).

Conclusion

The study emphasises the necessity of more consistent patient education and better physician communication about radiation hazards. Resolving misunderstandings and promoting informed decision-making can enhance patient confidence and optimise the utilisation of diagnostic imaging.

Implications for practice

This study underscores the importance of comprehensive patient education, standardised provider communication, and informed consent practices in addressing knowledge gaps and mitigating radiation-related fears. Community outreach and telemedicine can help address health literacy gaps, while digital technology and hospital-led counselling can facilitate a better understanding of radiation risk in patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信