“世上没有放之四海而皆准的东西”:一项针对体型较大的人在x光摄影中的经历的调查

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
C.J. Heales, P. Ulett, A. Hancock, F. Manning
{"title":"“世上没有放之四海而皆准的东西”:一项针对体型较大的人在x光摄影中的经历的调查","authors":"C.J. Heales,&nbsp;P. Ulett,&nbsp;A. Hancock,&nbsp;F. Manning","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals living in larger bodies face significant barriers when accessing healthcare, including both internal and external weight stigma. Within radiography, challenges such as inadequate equipment, accessibility limitations, and discomfort during procedures contribute to healthcare avoidance and poorer outcomes. This study investigates personal experiences of individuals living in larger bodies who have experienced radiographic services (medical imaging and radiotherapy) in the UK, with a focus on facilities, equipment, and accessories.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following institutional ethical approval, a cross-sectional survey was distributed via social media. The anonymous survey collected demographic data and invited participants to describe their most impactful experience within radiographic services. Basic content analysis was conducted on short text responses; then aligned with key quantitative responses and included alongside the results for illustrative purposes. Public engagement representatives contributed to the study design, ensuring inclusivity and appropriate terminology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>92 participants completed the survey. The majority identified as female (79.3 %) and white (94.6 %), with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years. Most respondents (98.9 %) had experience with medical imaging, while 16.3 % had undergone radiotherapy. Key challenges included inadequately sized hospital gowns (55.3 %), chairs with armrests limiting accessibility, and a lack of adjustable imaging equipment for taller individuals. Humiliation and discomfort were frequently reported, particularly regarding ill-fitting gowns in public settings. Unlike medical imaging, radiotherapy participants did not report significant equipment-related concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the impact of inadequate radiographic equipment on individuals living in larger bodies, with both practical and emotional consequences.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Findings suggest a need for improved accessibility to appropriately sized equipment and staff training to enhance patient experiences. Future research should explore emotional impacts and staff challenges to develop inclusive healthcare practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘No such thing as one size fits all’: A survey of experiences of those with larger bodies in radiography\",\"authors\":\"C.J. Heales,&nbsp;P. Ulett,&nbsp;A. Hancock,&nbsp;F. Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals living in larger bodies face significant barriers when accessing healthcare, including both internal and external weight stigma. Within radiography, challenges such as inadequate equipment, accessibility limitations, and discomfort during procedures contribute to healthcare avoidance and poorer outcomes. This study investigates personal experiences of individuals living in larger bodies who have experienced radiographic services (medical imaging and radiotherapy) in the UK, with a focus on facilities, equipment, and accessories.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following institutional ethical approval, a cross-sectional survey was distributed via social media. The anonymous survey collected demographic data and invited participants to describe their most impactful experience within radiographic services. Basic content analysis was conducted on short text responses; then aligned with key quantitative responses and included alongside the results for illustrative purposes. Public engagement representatives contributed to the study design, ensuring inclusivity and appropriate terminology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>92 participants completed the survey. The majority identified as female (79.3 %) and white (94.6 %), with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years. Most respondents (98.9 %) had experience with medical imaging, while 16.3 % had undergone radiotherapy. Key challenges included inadequately sized hospital gowns (55.3 %), chairs with armrests limiting accessibility, and a lack of adjustable imaging equipment for taller individuals. Humiliation and discomfort were frequently reported, particularly regarding ill-fitting gowns in public settings. Unlike medical imaging, radiotherapy participants did not report significant equipment-related concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the impact of inadequate radiographic equipment on individuals living in larger bodies, with both practical and emotional consequences.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Findings suggest a need for improved accessibility to appropriately sized equipment and staff training to enhance patient experiences. Future research should explore emotional impacts and staff challenges to develop inclusive healthcare practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500152X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742500152X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体型较大的个体在获得医疗保健时面临重大障碍,包括内部和外部体重耻辱感。在放射摄影中,设备不足、可及性限制和手术过程中的不适等挑战导致了医疗回避和较差的结果。本研究调查了在英国经历过放射治疗(医学成像和放射治疗)的较大个体的个人经历,重点是设施、设备和配件。方法在获得机构伦理批准后,通过社交媒体进行横断面调查。这项匿名调查收集了人口统计数据,并邀请参与者描述他们在放射治疗服务中最具影响力的经历。对短文本回复进行基本内容分析;然后与关键的定量回答保持一致,并与结果一起包含以说明目的。公众参与代表为研究设计做出了贡献,确保了包容性和适当的术语。92名参与者完成了调查。大多数为女性(79.3%)和白人(94.6%),年龄从18岁到85岁不等。大多数受访者(98.9%)有医学影像学经验,而16.3%的受访者接受过放疗。主要挑战包括病号服尺寸不足(55.3%)、带扶手的椅子限制了可及性,以及缺乏适合高个子患者的可调节成像设备。经常有羞辱和不适的报道,特别是在公共场合穿着不合身的礼服。与医学成像不同,放射治疗参与者没有报告与设备相关的重大问题。结论:本研究强调了不充分的放射设备对生活在较大身体中的个体的影响,包括实际和情感后果。对实践的启示:研究结果表明,需要改善对适当大小设备的可及性和对工作人员的培训,以提高患者的体验。未来的研究应探索情感影响和员工挑战,以发展包容性医疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘No such thing as one size fits all’: A survey of experiences of those with larger bodies in radiography

Introduction

Individuals living in larger bodies face significant barriers when accessing healthcare, including both internal and external weight stigma. Within radiography, challenges such as inadequate equipment, accessibility limitations, and discomfort during procedures contribute to healthcare avoidance and poorer outcomes. This study investigates personal experiences of individuals living in larger bodies who have experienced radiographic services (medical imaging and radiotherapy) in the UK, with a focus on facilities, equipment, and accessories.

Methods

Following institutional ethical approval, a cross-sectional survey was distributed via social media. The anonymous survey collected demographic data and invited participants to describe their most impactful experience within radiographic services. Basic content analysis was conducted on short text responses; then aligned with key quantitative responses and included alongside the results for illustrative purposes. Public engagement representatives contributed to the study design, ensuring inclusivity and appropriate terminology.

Results

92 participants completed the survey. The majority identified as female (79.3 %) and white (94.6 %), with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years. Most respondents (98.9 %) had experience with medical imaging, while 16.3 % had undergone radiotherapy. Key challenges included inadequately sized hospital gowns (55.3 %), chairs with armrests limiting accessibility, and a lack of adjustable imaging equipment for taller individuals. Humiliation and discomfort were frequently reported, particularly regarding ill-fitting gowns in public settings. Unlike medical imaging, radiotherapy participants did not report significant equipment-related concerns.

Conclusion

This study highlights the impact of inadequate radiographic equipment on individuals living in larger bodies, with both practical and emotional consequences.

Implications for practice

Findings suggest a need for improved accessibility to appropriately sized equipment and staff training to enhance patient experiences. Future research should explore emotional impacts and staff challenges to develop inclusive healthcare practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信