绿色债券招股说明书中的风险因素披露与投资者补偿

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Paraic McGee , Lisa Sheenan , Tom Egan , Sheila O'Donohoe
{"title":"绿色债券招股说明书中的风险因素披露与投资者补偿","authors":"Paraic McGee ,&nbsp;Lisa Sheenan ,&nbsp;Tom Egan ,&nbsp;Sheila O'Donohoe","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines green bond risk factor disclosure in European corporate prospectuses and investigates their impact on investor risk compensation. We extract six risk factors disclosed in 602 prospectuses corresponding to 1160 green bonds issued from 2015 to 2024 using non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) topic modelling. Novel risk factors disclosed include green-listing, EU Taxonomy compliance, ESG, Second Party Opinion (SPO), asset framework and GBP compliance. Green-listing, ESG, SPO and GBP compliance are the dominant risks disclosed by issuers, yet investors seek greater compensation for EU Taxonomy compliance and asset framework risk factors. We observe time variation as the introduction of EU regulatory initiatives recalibrates investor risk premia, leading to heightened demand for risk compensation. The findings underscore the clarity that European sustainable finance regulatory initiatives have brought to investors; however, the lack of scrutiny on the underlying assets financed with European corporate bonds may lead to an underestimation of systemic risk in the market, including physical, transition and greenwashing risks. We present a possible solution by calling on national competent authority prospectus approvers to categorise the assets financed with corporate green bonds. This would constitute an informed, targeted, early warning assessment of systemic risk in the green bond market that could positively impact financial stability. The paper contributes to the academic literature on green bonds, risk disclosure and textual analysis and helps inform European regulators as they navigate the evolving sustainable finance landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 104405"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factor disclosure in green bond prospectuses and investor compensation\",\"authors\":\"Paraic McGee ,&nbsp;Lisa Sheenan ,&nbsp;Tom Egan ,&nbsp;Sheila O'Donohoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines green bond risk factor disclosure in European corporate prospectuses and investigates their impact on investor risk compensation. We extract six risk factors disclosed in 602 prospectuses corresponding to 1160 green bonds issued from 2015 to 2024 using non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) topic modelling. Novel risk factors disclosed include green-listing, EU Taxonomy compliance, ESG, Second Party Opinion (SPO), asset framework and GBP compliance. Green-listing, ESG, SPO and GBP compliance are the dominant risks disclosed by issuers, yet investors seek greater compensation for EU Taxonomy compliance and asset framework risk factors. We observe time variation as the introduction of EU regulatory initiatives recalibrates investor risk premia, leading to heightened demand for risk compensation. The findings underscore the clarity that European sustainable finance regulatory initiatives have brought to investors; however, the lack of scrutiny on the underlying assets financed with European corporate bonds may lead to an underestimation of systemic risk in the market, including physical, transition and greenwashing risks. We present a possible solution by calling on national competent authority prospectus approvers to categorise the assets financed with corporate green bonds. This would constitute an informed, targeted, early warning assessment of systemic risk in the green bond market that could positively impact financial stability. The paper contributes to the academic literature on green bonds, risk disclosure and textual analysis and helps inform European regulators as they navigate the evolving sustainable finance landscape.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925004922\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925004922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了欧洲公司招股说明书中绿色债券风险因素的披露及其对投资者风险补偿的影响。我们使用非负矩阵分解(NMF)主题模型提取了2015年至2024年发行的1160只绿色债券对应的602份招股说明书中披露的6个风险因素。披露的新风险因素包括绿色上市、欧盟分类标准合规、ESG、第二方意见(SPO)、资产框架和英镑合规。绿色上市、ESG、SPO和GBP合规性是发行人披露的主要风险,但投资者对EU Taxonomy合规性和资产框架风险因素寻求更大的补偿。我们观察到时间变化,因为欧盟监管举措的引入重新校准了投资者的风险溢价,导致风险补偿的需求增加。调查结果突显出,欧洲可持续金融监管举措给投资者带来了明确性;然而,对欧洲公司债券融资的基础资产缺乏审查,可能会导致对市场系统性风险的低估,包括实物风险、转型风险和洗绿风险。我们提出了一个可能的解决方案,即呼吁国家主管部门对企业绿色债券融资的资产进行分类。这将构成对绿色债券市场系统性风险的知情、有针对性的早期预警评估,可能对金融稳定产生积极影响。本文为绿色债券、风险披露和文本分析的学术文献做出了贡献,并为欧洲监管机构在不断变化的可持续金融格局中导航提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factor disclosure in green bond prospectuses and investor compensation
This paper examines green bond risk factor disclosure in European corporate prospectuses and investigates their impact on investor risk compensation. We extract six risk factors disclosed in 602 prospectuses corresponding to 1160 green bonds issued from 2015 to 2024 using non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) topic modelling. Novel risk factors disclosed include green-listing, EU Taxonomy compliance, ESG, Second Party Opinion (SPO), asset framework and GBP compliance. Green-listing, ESG, SPO and GBP compliance are the dominant risks disclosed by issuers, yet investors seek greater compensation for EU Taxonomy compliance and asset framework risk factors. We observe time variation as the introduction of EU regulatory initiatives recalibrates investor risk premia, leading to heightened demand for risk compensation. The findings underscore the clarity that European sustainable finance regulatory initiatives have brought to investors; however, the lack of scrutiny on the underlying assets financed with European corporate bonds may lead to an underestimation of systemic risk in the market, including physical, transition and greenwashing risks. We present a possible solution by calling on national competent authority prospectus approvers to categorise the assets financed with corporate green bonds. This would constitute an informed, targeted, early warning assessment of systemic risk in the green bond market that could positively impact financial stability. The paper contributes to the academic literature on green bonds, risk disclosure and textual analysis and helps inform European regulators as they navigate the evolving sustainable finance landscape.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信