{"title":"基于机器学习的气候适应性基础设施区域洪水频率框架","authors":"Md. Robiul Islam, Mohammad Reza Najafi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional design flood estimation approaches assume stationary conditions and rely on historical climate data, potentially under- or over-estimating flood risks. This study proposes a regression-based Regional Flood Frequency Analysis (RFFA) framework to assess projected changes in spring flood quantiles under various warming scenarios. The methodology integrates five distinct regression models using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to establish functional relationships between flood quantiles and catchment physio-climatic variables. Focusing on Ontario’s prevalent spring floods, the BMA-RFFA framework demonstrates satisfactory predictive performance across flood quantiles. Future flood quantiles are projected using climatic data from CanRCM4 large ensemble simulations, capturing ensemble spread under a single model and scenario. Results indicate a nearly even distribution of median flood quantile changes from −13 % to +20 % under different warming scenarios, with increases in southern and western regions and decreases in the central region, highlighting spatial variability. Climatic variables such as seasonal water storage and rainfall intensity are identified as key predictors of future flood behavior. Continuous design flood changes over 10-year intervals from 1950 to 2100 were derived using an ensemble pooling approach, capturing the temporal evolution of flood quantiles driven by climate ensemble variability. The study also examined the contributions of Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC) and Internal Climate Variability (ICV), revealing ICV as dominant in most catchments, while ACC shows stronger influence in western regions. Overall, the proposed framework provides enhanced estimation of future flood quantiles and a robust assessment of their changing behavior under projected climate variability, supporting improved flood risk assessment and infrastructure resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"661 ","pages":"Article 133703"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based regional flood frequency framework for climate resilient infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"Md. Robiul Islam, Mohammad Reza Najafi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditional design flood estimation approaches assume stationary conditions and rely on historical climate data, potentially under- or over-estimating flood risks. This study proposes a regression-based Regional Flood Frequency Analysis (RFFA) framework to assess projected changes in spring flood quantiles under various warming scenarios. The methodology integrates five distinct regression models using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to establish functional relationships between flood quantiles and catchment physio-climatic variables. Focusing on Ontario’s prevalent spring floods, the BMA-RFFA framework demonstrates satisfactory predictive performance across flood quantiles. Future flood quantiles are projected using climatic data from CanRCM4 large ensemble simulations, capturing ensemble spread under a single model and scenario. Results indicate a nearly even distribution of median flood quantile changes from −13 % to +20 % under different warming scenarios, with increases in southern and western regions and decreases in the central region, highlighting spatial variability. Climatic variables such as seasonal water storage and rainfall intensity are identified as key predictors of future flood behavior. Continuous design flood changes over 10-year intervals from 1950 to 2100 were derived using an ensemble pooling approach, capturing the temporal evolution of flood quantiles driven by climate ensemble variability. The study also examined the contributions of Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC) and Internal Climate Variability (ICV), revealing ICV as dominant in most catchments, while ACC shows stronger influence in western regions. Overall, the proposed framework provides enhanced estimation of future flood quantiles and a robust assessment of their changing behavior under projected climate variability, supporting improved flood risk assessment and infrastructure resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"661 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425010418\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425010418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning-based regional flood frequency framework for climate resilient infrastructure
Traditional design flood estimation approaches assume stationary conditions and rely on historical climate data, potentially under- or over-estimating flood risks. This study proposes a regression-based Regional Flood Frequency Analysis (RFFA) framework to assess projected changes in spring flood quantiles under various warming scenarios. The methodology integrates five distinct regression models using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to establish functional relationships between flood quantiles and catchment physio-climatic variables. Focusing on Ontario’s prevalent spring floods, the BMA-RFFA framework demonstrates satisfactory predictive performance across flood quantiles. Future flood quantiles are projected using climatic data from CanRCM4 large ensemble simulations, capturing ensemble spread under a single model and scenario. Results indicate a nearly even distribution of median flood quantile changes from −13 % to +20 % under different warming scenarios, with increases in southern and western regions and decreases in the central region, highlighting spatial variability. Climatic variables such as seasonal water storage and rainfall intensity are identified as key predictors of future flood behavior. Continuous design flood changes over 10-year intervals from 1950 to 2100 were derived using an ensemble pooling approach, capturing the temporal evolution of flood quantiles driven by climate ensemble variability. The study also examined the contributions of Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC) and Internal Climate Variability (ICV), revealing ICV as dominant in most catchments, while ACC shows stronger influence in western regions. Overall, the proposed framework provides enhanced estimation of future flood quantiles and a robust assessment of their changing behavior under projected climate variability, supporting improved flood risk assessment and infrastructure resilience.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.