“在农业中1+1不等于2”:围绕数字农场书实施的重新配置和摩擦

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Paloma Yañez Serrano , Lucía Argüelles Ramos
{"title":"“在农业中1+1不等于2”:围绕数字农场书实施的重新配置和摩擦","authors":"Paloma Yañez Serrano ,&nbsp;Lucía Argüelles Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing on insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Feminist Political Ecology (FPE), this qualitative study emphasises the importance of integrating everyday and embodied dimensions to understand agriculture’s digitalisation. We explore reactions and dynamics around the implementation of a Digital Farm Book (DFB) in Spain as a key practice of the turn to “farming by numbers”, an agribiopolitical regime that aims at managing agriculture as a calculable environment. We do so by paying special attention to farmers’ embodied knowledge and their diverse forms of collecting, interpreting, or questioning data as well as changes in everyday practices and relations at the farm. We found that the DFB brings several re-arrangements which farming actors find challenging. We organize these “frictions” around three main aspects: the depreciation of sensorial, tacit, and experiential knowledge; the shifting roles and new practices favouring particular agrarian structures; and the contested conceptions around environmental sustainability. Yet, farmers and technicians do not fully reject the digital tools, nor data collection or data-driven knowledge. It is mostly the rigidity and standardization of the DFB that makes its adoption and integration challenging. In turn, we show how farming actors’ multiple knowledges around farming and data enrich our understanding of agricultural systems and highlight in the limits and challenges of agriculture’s digitalisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“In agriculture 1+1 does not equal 2”: Re-configurations and frictions around the implementation of the Digital Farm Book\",\"authors\":\"Paloma Yañez Serrano ,&nbsp;Lucía Argüelles Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drawing on insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Feminist Political Ecology (FPE), this qualitative study emphasises the importance of integrating everyday and embodied dimensions to understand agriculture’s digitalisation. We explore reactions and dynamics around the implementation of a Digital Farm Book (DFB) in Spain as a key practice of the turn to “farming by numbers”, an agribiopolitical regime that aims at managing agriculture as a calculable environment. We do so by paying special attention to farmers’ embodied knowledge and their diverse forms of collecting, interpreting, or questioning data as well as changes in everyday practices and relations at the farm. We found that the DFB brings several re-arrangements which farming actors find challenging. We organize these “frictions” around three main aspects: the depreciation of sensorial, tacit, and experiential knowledge; the shifting roles and new practices favouring particular agrarian structures; and the contested conceptions around environmental sustainability. Yet, farmers and technicians do not fully reject the digital tools, nor data collection or data-driven knowledge. It is mostly the rigidity and standardization of the DFB that makes its adoption and integration challenging. In turn, we show how farming actors’ multiple knowledges around farming and data enrich our understanding of agricultural systems and highlight in the limits and challenges of agriculture’s digitalisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001443\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据科学技术研究(STS)和女权主义政治生态学(FPE)的见解,这项定性研究强调了整合日常维度和具体维度对理解农业数字化的重要性。我们探讨了围绕在西班牙实施数字农场书(DFB)的反应和动态,作为转向“数字农业”的关键实践,这是一种旨在将农业作为可计算环境进行管理的农业生物政治制度。为此,我们特别关注农民的具体知识,以及他们收集、解释或质疑数据的各种形式,以及农场日常实践和关系的变化。我们发现DFB带来了一些重新安排,这对农业演员来说很有挑战性。我们围绕三个主要方面组织这些“摩擦”:感官、隐性和经验知识的贬值;有利于特定农业结构的角色转变和新做法;以及围绕环境可持续性的争议概念。然而,农民和技术人员并没有完全拒绝数字工具、数据收集或数据驱动的知识。主要是DFB的刚性和标准化使其采用和集成具有挑战性。反过来,我们展示了农业参与者在农业和数据方面的多种知识如何丰富了我们对农业系统的理解,并突出了农业数字化的限制和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“In agriculture 1+1 does not equal 2”: Re-configurations and frictions around the implementation of the Digital Farm Book
Drawing on insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Feminist Political Ecology (FPE), this qualitative study emphasises the importance of integrating everyday and embodied dimensions to understand agriculture’s digitalisation. We explore reactions and dynamics around the implementation of a Digital Farm Book (DFB) in Spain as a key practice of the turn to “farming by numbers”, an agribiopolitical regime that aims at managing agriculture as a calculable environment. We do so by paying special attention to farmers’ embodied knowledge and their diverse forms of collecting, interpreting, or questioning data as well as changes in everyday practices and relations at the farm. We found that the DFB brings several re-arrangements which farming actors find challenging. We organize these “frictions” around three main aspects: the depreciation of sensorial, tacit, and experiential knowledge; the shifting roles and new practices favouring particular agrarian structures; and the contested conceptions around environmental sustainability. Yet, farmers and technicians do not fully reject the digital tools, nor data collection or data-driven knowledge. It is mostly the rigidity and standardization of the DFB that makes its adoption and integration challenging. In turn, we show how farming actors’ multiple knowledges around farming and data enrich our understanding of agricultural systems and highlight in the limits and challenges of agriculture’s digitalisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信