成本框架如何影响大学申请:来自目标信息干预的证据

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Joshua A. Price
{"title":"成本框架如何影响大学申请:来自目标信息干预的证据","authors":"Joshua A. Price","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates an experiment conducted at a regional public university aimed at increasing college applications by reframing how tuition costs were presented to prospective students. High school seniors with a GPA of 3.0 or higher received letters outlining the application process and financial aid eligibility. A randomized subset received an enhanced version of the letter that emphasized the net cost of attending college—highlighting how the Pell Grant could significantly reduce tuition—rather than focusing on the full, list price. Results show that letters highlighting net costs increased application rates by 2.03 percentage points overall, with students most likely to qualify for the Pell Grant 4.08 percentage points more likely to apply. However, the intervention did not significantly influence enrollment decisions or FAFSA completion rates. These findings underscore both the promise and limitations of low-cost, information-based outreach efforts. While salient cost framing can shift application behavior, additional support may be needed to convert interest into enrollment—particularly at broad-access institutions serving economically diverse populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102677"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How cost framing affects college applications: evidence from a targeted information intervention\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates an experiment conducted at a regional public university aimed at increasing college applications by reframing how tuition costs were presented to prospective students. High school seniors with a GPA of 3.0 or higher received letters outlining the application process and financial aid eligibility. A randomized subset received an enhanced version of the letter that emphasized the net cost of attending college—highlighting how the Pell Grant could significantly reduce tuition—rather than focusing on the full, list price. Results show that letters highlighting net costs increased application rates by 2.03 percentage points overall, with students most likely to qualify for the Pell Grant 4.08 percentage points more likely to apply. However, the intervention did not significantly influence enrollment decisions or FAFSA completion rates. These findings underscore both the promise and limitations of low-cost, information-based outreach efforts. While salient cost framing can shift application behavior, additional support may be needed to convert interest into enrollment—particularly at broad-access institutions serving economically diverse populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000573\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000573","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了在一所地区公立大学进行的一项实验,该实验旨在通过重新设计学费如何呈现给未来的学生来增加大学申请。GPA为3.0或更高的高中毕业生会收到概述申请流程和经济援助资格的信件。一组随机分组的学生收到了这封信的强化版,强调了上大学的净成本——强调了佩尔助学金如何能显著降低学费——而不是关注学费的全部标价。结果显示,强调净成本的信件总体上使申请率提高了2.03个百分点,最有可能获得佩尔助学金的学生的申请率提高了4.08个百分点。然而,干预并没有显著影响入学决定或FAFSA完成率。这些发现强调了低成本、基于信息的外联工作的希望和局限性。虽然显著的成本框架可以改变申请行为,但可能需要额外的支持来将兴趣转化为入学——特别是在为经济多样化人群提供服务的广泛入学机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How cost framing affects college applications: evidence from a targeted information intervention
This study evaluates an experiment conducted at a regional public university aimed at increasing college applications by reframing how tuition costs were presented to prospective students. High school seniors with a GPA of 3.0 or higher received letters outlining the application process and financial aid eligibility. A randomized subset received an enhanced version of the letter that emphasized the net cost of attending college—highlighting how the Pell Grant could significantly reduce tuition—rather than focusing on the full, list price. Results show that letters highlighting net costs increased application rates by 2.03 percentage points overall, with students most likely to qualify for the Pell Grant 4.08 percentage points more likely to apply. However, the intervention did not significantly influence enrollment decisions or FAFSA completion rates. These findings underscore both the promise and limitations of low-cost, information-based outreach efforts. While salient cost framing can shift application behavior, additional support may be needed to convert interest into enrollment—particularly at broad-access institutions serving economically diverse populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信