用热泵支持建筑热脱碳:瑞士主要州的补贴方案分析

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Xiang Li , Roman Bolliger , Monika Hall , Martin Patel
{"title":"用热泵支持建筑热脱碳:瑞士主要州的补贴方案分析","authors":"Xiang Li ,&nbsp;Roman Bolliger ,&nbsp;Monika Hall ,&nbsp;Martin Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heat pumps (HP) are a key solution for decarbonizing building heating systems. However, their adoption remains slow due to high upfront costs, technical challenges, and limited financial support. This study examines the impact of mandatory requirements to transition to HPs, combined with subsidy schemes, based on real-world case studies from two Swiss cantons. Two approaches of establishing the subsidy level are distinguished: i) LCOH-based subsidies, bringing down the levelized cost of renewable heating to the level of a gas boiler; and ii) Capital expenditure-based (CapEx-based) subsidies, which, in pure form, are designed to entirely repay the extra investment cost for installing the renewable heating system relative to a gas boiler. We find that current subsidy levels cover only a small portion of the additional investment costs compared to gas boilers and in most cases, they somewhat exceed the LCOH-based subsidy level. Today's subsidy levels can be considered as good compromise between the two ways studied (i and ii), while opportunities are shown for some adaptations in the studied regulatory frameworks. These findings provide practical guidance for designing effective subsidy schemes for other Swiss cantons and other countries aiming to decarbonize building heating systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 114722"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting building heat decarbonization with heat Pumps: Analysis of subsidy schemes in Swiss leading cantons\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Li ,&nbsp;Roman Bolliger ,&nbsp;Monika Hall ,&nbsp;Martin Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Heat pumps (HP) are a key solution for decarbonizing building heating systems. However, their adoption remains slow due to high upfront costs, technical challenges, and limited financial support. This study examines the impact of mandatory requirements to transition to HPs, combined with subsidy schemes, based on real-world case studies from two Swiss cantons. Two approaches of establishing the subsidy level are distinguished: i) LCOH-based subsidies, bringing down the levelized cost of renewable heating to the level of a gas boiler; and ii) Capital expenditure-based (CapEx-based) subsidies, which, in pure form, are designed to entirely repay the extra investment cost for installing the renewable heating system relative to a gas boiler. We find that current subsidy levels cover only a small portion of the additional investment costs compared to gas boilers and in most cases, they somewhat exceed the LCOH-based subsidy level. Today's subsidy levels can be considered as good compromise between the two ways studied (i and ii), while opportunities are shown for some adaptations in the studied regulatory frameworks. These findings provide practical guidance for designing effective subsidy schemes for other Swiss cantons and other countries aiming to decarbonize building heating systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002290\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热泵(HP)是建筑供暖系统脱碳的关键解决方案。然而,由于高昂的前期成本、技术挑战和有限的财政支持,它们的采用仍然缓慢。本研究基于瑞士两个州的实际案例研究,考察了强制性要求与补贴计划相结合对向hp过渡的影响。本文区分了两种确定补贴水平的方法:1)基于lcoh的补贴,将可再生能源供暖的平准化成本降低到燃气锅炉的水平;ii)基于资本支出(capex)的补贴,其纯粹形式是为了完全偿还安装可再生供暖系统相对于燃气锅炉的额外投资成本。我们发现,与燃气锅炉相比,目前的补贴水平只覆盖了一小部分额外投资成本,而且在大多数情况下,它们略高于基于lcoh的补贴水平。今天的补贴水平可以被认为是所研究的两种方式(i和ii)之间的良好妥协,同时在所研究的监管框架中显示出一些调整的机会。这些发现为瑞士其他州和其他旨在使建筑供暖系统脱碳的国家设计有效的补贴方案提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting building heat decarbonization with heat Pumps: Analysis of subsidy schemes in Swiss leading cantons
Heat pumps (HP) are a key solution for decarbonizing building heating systems. However, their adoption remains slow due to high upfront costs, technical challenges, and limited financial support. This study examines the impact of mandatory requirements to transition to HPs, combined with subsidy schemes, based on real-world case studies from two Swiss cantons. Two approaches of establishing the subsidy level are distinguished: i) LCOH-based subsidies, bringing down the levelized cost of renewable heating to the level of a gas boiler; and ii) Capital expenditure-based (CapEx-based) subsidies, which, in pure form, are designed to entirely repay the extra investment cost for installing the renewable heating system relative to a gas boiler. We find that current subsidy levels cover only a small portion of the additional investment costs compared to gas boilers and in most cases, they somewhat exceed the LCOH-based subsidy level. Today's subsidy levels can be considered as good compromise between the two ways studied (i and ii), while opportunities are shown for some adaptations in the studied regulatory frameworks. These findings provide practical guidance for designing effective subsidy schemes for other Swiss cantons and other countries aiming to decarbonize building heating systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信