采用无纹身表面引导装置的切向全乳房放射治疗每周成像方案的验证

Q1 Nursing
Sumie Namba , Jared Steel , Matthew Hoffmann , Hannah Thompson , Abbey Baylis , Carmen Hansen , Thomas Shakespeare
{"title":"采用无纹身表面引导装置的切向全乳房放射治疗每周成像方案的验证","authors":"Sumie Namba ,&nbsp;Jared Steel ,&nbsp;Matthew Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Hannah Thompson ,&nbsp;Abbey Baylis ,&nbsp;Carmen Hansen ,&nbsp;Thomas Shakespeare","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&amp;W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.</div><div>The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&amp;W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.</div><div>95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.</div><div>We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&amp;W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setup\",\"authors\":\"Sumie Namba ,&nbsp;Jared Steel ,&nbsp;Matthew Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Hannah Thompson ,&nbsp;Abbey Baylis ,&nbsp;Carmen Hansen ,&nbsp;Thomas Shakespeare\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&amp;W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.</div><div>The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&amp;W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.</div><div>95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.</div><div>We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&amp;W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在辅助全乳房放疗(WBRT)患者中,无纹身表面引导设置前4个部分然后每周成像计划(F1-4&;W)是否是纹身对齐设置的合适替代方案。30例使用无纹身表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)的患者的每日CBCT图像(n = 450)回顾性地与WBRT方案重新匹配。评估了重新匹配的准确性,并采用F1-4&;W成像程序来调查将被处理到0.5 cm公差的分数的百分比。将结果与100名连续接受WBRT治疗的患者的设置准确性进行比较,使用现有的基于纹身的校准方法。95.8%的无纹身的SGRT设置分数被评估为在耐受范围内,与非成像分数的等中心最大差异为0.7 cm。当比较图像分数时,98%的患者定位在等心0.5 cm内,而纹身对准方法只有80%的时间实现这一目标。研究组(SGRT/CBCT)和对照组(EPI/纹身)患者的总体成像频率分别为51%和53%。我们得出结论,无纹身的SGRT提供了一种一致准确的方法来设置仰卧切向WBRT患者,有利于患者的体验。此外,F1-4&;W成像计划足以确保患者在耐受范围内接受治疗,同时在需要增加成像频率时保持适当的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setup
This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.
The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.
95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.
We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信