Sumie Namba , Jared Steel , Matthew Hoffmann , Hannah Thompson , Abbey Baylis , Carmen Hansen , Thomas Shakespeare
{"title":"采用无纹身表面引导装置的切向全乳房放射治疗每周成像方案的验证","authors":"Sumie Namba , Jared Steel , Matthew Hoffmann , Hannah Thompson , Abbey Baylis , Carmen Hansen , Thomas Shakespeare","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.</div><div>The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.</div><div>95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.</div><div>We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setup\",\"authors\":\"Sumie Namba , Jared Steel , Matthew Hoffmann , Hannah Thompson , Abbey Baylis , Carmen Hansen , Thomas Shakespeare\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.</div><div>The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.</div><div>95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.</div><div>We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a weekly imaging protocol for tangential whole breast radiation therapy with a tattoo-less surface-guided setup
This study explored whether tattoo-less surface guided setups with a first 4 fractions then weekly imaging schedule (F1-4&W) is a suitable alternative to tattoo alignment setups for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) patients.
The daily CBCT images (n = 450) of 30 patients treated using tattoo-less surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) were retrospectively re-matched to a WBRT protocol. The accuracy of the re-match was assessed, and a F1-4&W imaging schedule applied to investigate the percentage of fractions that would have been treated to a 0.5 cm tolerance. The results were compared with the setup accuracy of 100 consecutive patients treated with WBRT using the existing practice of tattoo-based alignment.
95.8 % of the tattoo-less SGRT setup fractions were assessed to be treated within tolerance, with a maximum discrepancy from isocentre of 0.7 cm for a non-imaged fraction. When comparing imaged fractions, 98 % of these patients positioned within 0.5 cm of isocentre, while the tattoo-alignment method achieved this only 80 % of the time. The overall imaging frequency rates per patient were 51 % and 53 % for study (SGRT/CBCT) and control groups (EPI/tattoos) respectively.
We conclude that tattoo-less SGRT provides a consistently accurate method to setup supine tangential WBRT patients with a benefit to patient experience. Furthermore, a F1-4&W imaging schedule is sufficient to ensure patients are treated within tolerance, while maintaining appropriate indication for when increased imaging frequency is necessary.