眼见为实:解构现实,在加纳大阿克拉地区使用和支付电子烹饪技术的意愿

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Simon Bawakyillenuo, Innocent S.K. Agbelie, Aba O. Crentsil, Stephanie K. Danquah
{"title":"眼见为实:解构现实,在加纳大阿克拉地区使用和支付电子烹饪技术的意愿","authors":"Simon Bawakyillenuo,&nbsp;Innocent S.K. Agbelie,&nbsp;Aba O. Crentsil,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Danquah","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Households in most developing countries underutilise modern energy cooking services like e-cooking. In Ghana, only 0.4 % of households are estimated to cook primarily with electricity as of 2023. Meanwhile, biomass fuels dominate the cooking fuel landscape of both urban and peri-urban households in Ghana, compounding the household air pollution situation, which is one of the most critical health risk factors at present. The paper seeks to unpack empirically the evidence that counters the misconceptions around e-cooking among urban and peri-urban households in the Greater Accra Region and to assess their willingness to use and pay for e-cooking technologies. Two methodological approaches were employed to achieve these objectives. Firstly, standardized semi-controlled cooking tests were carried out with four local meals prepared using 4 fuel technologies. Secondly, a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) approach was utilised, involving the survey of 1203 households from Adenta, Ga East, and Ga West Municipalities. The results revealed that at least 70 % of the households sampled perceived e-cooking to be more expensive than cooking with charcoal and LPG. However, the cooking experiment outcomes showed e-cooking to be far cheaper compared to cooking with charcoal and LPG. Households' willingness to use e-cooking technologies increased after they saw the results of the experiment. However, most of them demonstrated a lower willingness to pay values than the market value of the Electric Pressure Cooker due to lack of affordability. The enhancement of e-cooking technologies adoption will depend on a set of transformative initiatives by all stakeholders in the energy sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing is believing: Deconstructing the realities, willingness-to-use and pay for e-cook technologies in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Simon Bawakyillenuo,&nbsp;Innocent S.K. Agbelie,&nbsp;Aba O. Crentsil,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Danquah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Households in most developing countries underutilise modern energy cooking services like e-cooking. In Ghana, only 0.4 % of households are estimated to cook primarily with electricity as of 2023. Meanwhile, biomass fuels dominate the cooking fuel landscape of both urban and peri-urban households in Ghana, compounding the household air pollution situation, which is one of the most critical health risk factors at present. The paper seeks to unpack empirically the evidence that counters the misconceptions around e-cooking among urban and peri-urban households in the Greater Accra Region and to assess their willingness to use and pay for e-cooking technologies. Two methodological approaches were employed to achieve these objectives. Firstly, standardized semi-controlled cooking tests were carried out with four local meals prepared using 4 fuel technologies. Secondly, a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) approach was utilised, involving the survey of 1203 households from Adenta, Ga East, and Ga West Municipalities. The results revealed that at least 70 % of the households sampled perceived e-cooking to be more expensive than cooking with charcoal and LPG. However, the cooking experiment outcomes showed e-cooking to be far cheaper compared to cooking with charcoal and LPG. Households' willingness to use e-cooking technologies increased after they saw the results of the experiment. However, most of them demonstrated a lower willingness to pay values than the market value of the Electric Pressure Cooker due to lack of affordability. The enhancement of e-cooking technologies adoption will depend on a set of transformative initiatives by all stakeholders in the energy sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数发展中国家的家庭没有充分利用电子烹饪等现代能源烹饪服务。在加纳,到2023年,估计只有0.4%的家庭主要用电做饭。同时,生物质燃料在加纳城市和城郊家庭的烹饪燃料中占主导地位,加剧了家庭空气污染状况,这是目前最关键的健康风险因素之一。本文试图从经验上揭示证据,反驳大阿克拉地区城市和城郊家庭对电子烹饪的误解,并评估他们使用和支付电子烹饪技术的意愿。为了实现这些目标,采用了两种方法方法。首先,对使用4种燃料技术制作的4种当地饭菜进行了标准化半控制烹饪试验。其次,采用了一种混合方法(定量和定性),对来自Adenta、Ga East和Ga West市的1203户家庭进行了调查。结果显示,至少70%的抽样家庭认为电子烹饪比使用木炭和液化石油气烹饪更昂贵。然而,烹饪实验结果表明,与木炭和液化石油气烹饪相比,电子烹饪要便宜得多。在看到实验结果后,家庭使用电子烹饪技术的意愿增加了。然而,由于缺乏负担能力,大多数人表现出支付价值低于电压力锅市场价值的意愿。提高电子烹饪技术的采用将取决于能源部门所有利益相关者的一系列变革举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeing is believing: Deconstructing the realities, willingness-to-use and pay for e-cook technologies in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana
Households in most developing countries underutilise modern energy cooking services like e-cooking. In Ghana, only 0.4 % of households are estimated to cook primarily with electricity as of 2023. Meanwhile, biomass fuels dominate the cooking fuel landscape of both urban and peri-urban households in Ghana, compounding the household air pollution situation, which is one of the most critical health risk factors at present. The paper seeks to unpack empirically the evidence that counters the misconceptions around e-cooking among urban and peri-urban households in the Greater Accra Region and to assess their willingness to use and pay for e-cooking technologies. Two methodological approaches were employed to achieve these objectives. Firstly, standardized semi-controlled cooking tests were carried out with four local meals prepared using 4 fuel technologies. Secondly, a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) approach was utilised, involving the survey of 1203 households from Adenta, Ga East, and Ga West Municipalities. The results revealed that at least 70 % of the households sampled perceived e-cooking to be more expensive than cooking with charcoal and LPG. However, the cooking experiment outcomes showed e-cooking to be far cheaper compared to cooking with charcoal and LPG. Households' willingness to use e-cooking technologies increased after they saw the results of the experiment. However, most of them demonstrated a lower willingness to pay values than the market value of the Electric Pressure Cooker due to lack of affordability. The enhancement of e-cooking technologies adoption will depend on a set of transformative initiatives by all stakeholders in the energy sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信