考察学生在高等教育中使用人工智能工具的观点：平面设计中的人工智能工具的案例研究

IF 2.7 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105190

Ahmed Alsswey

{"title":"考察学生在高等教育中使用人工智能工具的观点：平面设计中的人工智能工具的案例研究","authors":"Ahmed Alsswey","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding and utilizing AI tools ensure that designers, particularly students, remain involved in a rapidly evolving industry. This study aimed to investigate students' perspectives on the use of AI tools in graphic design. A pre–post-test control group design was used, involving 112 students (56 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group) from Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan who were enrolled in the design software course. The findings revealed significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding Utilitarian Benefits, Hedonic Benefits, Learnability, and User Experience, with students in the intervention group showing greater improvements in these areas. Based on these results, the study recommends incorporating AI design tools into the educational curriculum as an effective learning method and strategy for students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 105190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining students' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence tools in higher education: A case study on AI tools of graphic design\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alsswey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding and utilizing AI tools ensure that designers, particularly students, remain involved in a rapidly evolving industry. This study aimed to investigate students' perspectives on the use of AI tools in graphic design. A pre–post-test control group design was used, involving 112 students (56 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group) from Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan who were enrolled in the design software course. The findings revealed significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding Utilitarian Benefits, Hedonic Benefits, Learnability, and User Experience, with students in the intervention group showing greater improvements in these areas. Based on these results, the study recommends incorporating AI design tools into the educational curriculum as an effective learning method and strategy for students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

理解和利用人工智能工具可以确保设计师，特别是学生，仍然参与到快速发展的行业中。本研究旨在调查学生对在平面设计中使用人工智能工具的看法。采用测试前-后对照组设计，涉及112名来自约旦Al-Zaytoonah大学的学生，其中56名为干预组，56名为对照组，他们参加了设计软件课程。研究结果显示，干预组和对照组在功利利益、享乐利益、易学性和用户体验方面存在显著差异，干预组的学生在这些方面表现出更大的进步。基于这些结果，该研究建议将人工智能设计工具作为一种有效的学习方法和策略纳入教育课程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Examining students' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence tools in higher education: A case study on AI tools of graphic design

Understanding and utilizing AI tools ensure that designers, particularly students, remain involved in a rapidly evolving industry. This study aimed to investigate students' perspectives on the use of AI tools in graphic design. A pre–post-test control group design was used, involving 112 students (56 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group) from Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan who were enrolled in the design software course. The findings revealed significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding Utilitarian Benefits, Hedonic Benefits, Learnability, and User Experience, with students in the intervention group showing greater improvements in these areas. Based on these results, the study recommends incorporating AI design tools into the educational curriculum as an effective learning method and strategy for students.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

5.60%

发文量

274

审稿时长

36 weeks

期刊介绍： Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.