Larry B. Barber*, Samuel A. Miller, Lee Blaney, Paul M. Bradley, Kaycee E. Faunce, Jacob A. Fleck, Malinda Frick, Ke He, Ryan D. Hollins, Conor J. Lewellyn, Emily H. Majcher, Mitchell A. McAdoo and Kelly L. Smalling,
{"title":"城市和工业污水处理厂的污水对波托马克河中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的贡献:流域尺度的测量和建模方法","authors":"Larry B. Barber*, Samuel A. Miller, Lee Blaney, Paul M. Bradley, Kaycee E. Faunce, Jacob A. Fleck, Malinda Frick, Ke He, Ryan D. Hollins, Conor J. Lewellyn, Emily H. Majcher, Mitchell A. McAdoo and Kelly L. Smalling, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1216710.1021/acs.est.4c12167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in water resources requires a basin-scale approach. Predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) and stream-vulnerability scores for PFAS were determined for the Potomac River watershed in the eastern United States. Approximately 15% of stream reaches contained municipal and/or industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges that are presumptive PFAS sources, comprising from <1 to >90% of streamflow. Mean annual PEC, based on the summed concentrations of eight PFAS detected in WWTP effluents (ΣPFAS<sub>PEC</sub>), for all stream reaches in the watershed was 3.8 ng L<sup>–1</sup>, and stream reaches impacted by WWTP had perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) PEC of 0.39 and 0.14 ng L<sup>–1</sup>. For locations where measured-environmental concentrations (MEC) were determined, municipal and industrial WWTP contributed 7.8% (0 to 65%) of the total annual streamflow and MEC were greater than PEC in 99% of the samples, indicating additional potential PFAS sources. The mean ΣPFAS<sub>PEC</sub> was 9.1 ng L<sup>–1</sup> compared to a mean sum of PFAS MEC of 34 ng L<sup>–1</sup>. Under mean-August low-flow, 17% and 9.4% of the water-supply intakes had maximum PFOA and PFOS PEC exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels.</p><p >Screening-level measuring and modeling provides source-to-receptor assessment of human and ecosystem exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances for all stream reaches in a watershed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 23","pages":"11720–11734 11720–11734"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.4c12167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Contributions to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Potomac River: A Basin-Scale Measuring and Modeling Approach\",\"authors\":\"Larry B. Barber*, Samuel A. Miller, Lee Blaney, Paul M. Bradley, Kaycee E. Faunce, Jacob A. Fleck, Malinda Frick, Ke He, Ryan D. Hollins, Conor J. Lewellyn, Emily H. Majcher, Mitchell A. McAdoo and Kelly L. Smalling, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c1216710.1021/acs.est.4c12167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in water resources requires a basin-scale approach. Predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) and stream-vulnerability scores for PFAS were determined for the Potomac River watershed in the eastern United States. Approximately 15% of stream reaches contained municipal and/or industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges that are presumptive PFAS sources, comprising from <1 to >90% of streamflow. Mean annual PEC, based on the summed concentrations of eight PFAS detected in WWTP effluents (ΣPFAS<sub>PEC</sub>), for all stream reaches in the watershed was 3.8 ng L<sup>–1</sup>, and stream reaches impacted by WWTP had perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) PEC of 0.39 and 0.14 ng L<sup>–1</sup>. For locations where measured-environmental concentrations (MEC) were determined, municipal and industrial WWTP contributed 7.8% (0 to 65%) of the total annual streamflow and MEC were greater than PEC in 99% of the samples, indicating additional potential PFAS sources. The mean ΣPFAS<sub>PEC</sub> was 9.1 ng L<sup>–1</sup> compared to a mean sum of PFAS MEC of 34 ng L<sup>–1</sup>. Under mean-August low-flow, 17% and 9.4% of the water-supply intakes had maximum PFOA and PFOS PEC exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels.</p><p >Screening-level measuring and modeling provides source-to-receptor assessment of human and ecosystem exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances for all stream reaches in a watershed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 23\",\"pages\":\"11720–11734 11720–11734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.4c12167\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c12167\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c12167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
管理水资源中的单氟烷基和多氟烷基物质需要采用流域尺度的办法。对美国东部的波托马克河流域进行了PFAS的预测环境浓度(PEC)和河流脆弱性评分测定。大约15%的河流河段含有市政和/或工业废水处理厂(WWTP)排放的假定PFAS来源,占河流流量的1%至90%。根据污水处理厂出水中检测到的8种PFAS的浓度总和(ΣPFASPEC),流域内所有河流的年平均PEC为3.8 ng L-1,受污水处理厂影响的河流的全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS) PEC分别为0.39和0.14 ng L-1。在测量环境浓度(MEC)的地点,城市和工业污水处理量占年总流量的7.8%(0 - 65%),99%的样本的MEC大于PEC,表明有其他潜在的PFAS来源。平均ΣPFASPEC为9.1 ng L-1, PFAS MEC的平均总和为34 ng L-1。在8月平均低流量情况下,17%和9.4%的供水取水口PFOA和PFOS PEC的最大值超过饮用水最大污染物水平。筛选水平的测量和建模为流域内所有河流的人类和生态系统接触全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质提供了从源头到受体的评估。
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Contributions to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Potomac River: A Basin-Scale Measuring and Modeling Approach
Managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in water resources requires a basin-scale approach. Predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) and stream-vulnerability scores for PFAS were determined for the Potomac River watershed in the eastern United States. Approximately 15% of stream reaches contained municipal and/or industrial wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges that are presumptive PFAS sources, comprising from <1 to >90% of streamflow. Mean annual PEC, based on the summed concentrations of eight PFAS detected in WWTP effluents (ΣPFASPEC), for all stream reaches in the watershed was 3.8 ng L–1, and stream reaches impacted by WWTP had perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) PEC of 0.39 and 0.14 ng L–1. For locations where measured-environmental concentrations (MEC) were determined, municipal and industrial WWTP contributed 7.8% (0 to 65%) of the total annual streamflow and MEC were greater than PEC in 99% of the samples, indicating additional potential PFAS sources. The mean ΣPFASPEC was 9.1 ng L–1 compared to a mean sum of PFAS MEC of 34 ng L–1. Under mean-August low-flow, 17% and 9.4% of the water-supply intakes had maximum PFOA and PFOS PEC exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels.
Screening-level measuring and modeling provides source-to-receptor assessment of human and ecosystem exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances for all stream reaches in a watershed.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.