{"title":"圆柱形环形屈光元件(CARE)眼镜片延缓2年以上近视进展的疗效。","authors":"Xiaoqin Chen,Min Wu,Cui Yu,Arne Ohlendorf,Wayne Li,Nicole Liu,Youhua Yang,Lihua Li,Padmaja Sankaridurg","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo evaluate over a 2-year period, the efficacy of spectacle lenses incorporating cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) in slowing myopia progression compared to single vision (SV) spectacle wear.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nDouble-masked, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 240 Chinese children aged 6-13 yrs, spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) -0.75D to -5.00D were randomized to one of three groups of SV spectacle lens, CARE spectacles (7mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone incorporating CARE with mean surface power +4.6D), and CARE S (9mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone comprising CARE with mean surface power +3.8D). Cycloplegic SE and axial length (AL) were measured at six-monthly intervals.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nProgression (mean ± SD) in SV wearing eyes after 24 months of SPL wear was -1.15 ± 0.63 D/ 0.59 ± 0.26 mm with SV for SE/AL, respectively. In comparison, myopia progression was significantly slower with both CARE-0.73 ± 0.63D/ 0.40 ± 0.26 mm, p<.0001 and CARE S -0.80 ± 0.56D/ 0.44 ± 0.25 mm, p<.0001. Progression did not differ significantly between CARE lenses. Adjusting for site, group, age, gender and baseline value at 24 months, CARE showed an absolute difference in SE of 0.44D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) and CARE S 0.41D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) compared to SV. AL reduction was 0.20 mm (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.30mm) with CARE and 0.17 mm (0.07 to 0.26mm) with CARE S as compared to SV.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOver a 2-year period, lenses incorporating CARE significantly slowed myopia progression as compared to SV lenses.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) spectacle lenses in slowing myopia progression over 2 years.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqin Chen,Min Wu,Cui Yu,Arne Ohlendorf,Wayne Li,Nicole Liu,Youhua Yang,Lihua Li,Padmaja Sankaridurg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo evaluate over a 2-year period, the efficacy of spectacle lenses incorporating cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) in slowing myopia progression compared to single vision (SV) spectacle wear.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nDouble-masked, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA total of 240 Chinese children aged 6-13 yrs, spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) -0.75D to -5.00D were randomized to one of three groups of SV spectacle lens, CARE spectacles (7mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone incorporating CARE with mean surface power +4.6D), and CARE S (9mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone comprising CARE with mean surface power +3.8D). Cycloplegic SE and axial length (AL) were measured at six-monthly intervals.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nProgression (mean ± SD) in SV wearing eyes after 24 months of SPL wear was -1.15 ± 0.63 D/ 0.59 ± 0.26 mm with SV for SE/AL, respectively. In comparison, myopia progression was significantly slower with both CARE-0.73 ± 0.63D/ 0.40 ± 0.26 mm, p<.0001 and CARE S -0.80 ± 0.56D/ 0.44 ± 0.25 mm, p<.0001. Progression did not differ significantly between CARE lenses. Adjusting for site, group, age, gender and baseline value at 24 months, CARE showed an absolute difference in SE of 0.44D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) and CARE S 0.41D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) compared to SV. AL reduction was 0.20 mm (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.30mm) with CARE and 0.17 mm (0.07 to 0.26mm) with CARE S as compared to SV.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOver a 2-year period, lenses incorporating CARE significantly slowed myopia progression as compared to SV lenses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价在2年的时间里,与单视力(SV)眼镜配戴相比,带圆柱形环形屈光元件(CARE)的眼镜在减缓近视进展方面的效果。设计:双盲、多中心、随机临床试验。方法240例6 ~ 13岁的中国儿童,球面等效屈光差(SE) -0.75D ~ -5.00D,随机分为3组:SV眼镜组、CARE眼镜组(7mm中心透明区周围包含CARE治疗区,平均表面度数+4.6D)和CARE S眼镜组(9mm中心透明区周围包含CARE治疗区,平均表面度数+3.8D)。每隔6个月测量一次睫状体麻痹SE和轴长(AL)。结果SV配戴后24个月的进展(平均±SD)分别为-1.15±0.63 D/ 0.59±0.26 mm, SV为SE/AL。相比之下,近视进展明显减慢,均为0.73±0.63D/ 0.40±0.26 mm, p<。0001和CARE S -0.80±0.56D/ 0.44±0.25 mm, p< 0.0001。在不同的CARE镜片间进展无显著差异。调整部位、组、年龄、性别和24个月时的基线值,与SV相比,CARE的SE绝对差异为0.44D (95% CI: 0.21至0.66D), CARE的S绝对差异为0.41D (95% CI: 0.21至0.66D)。与SV相比,CARE组AL减少0.20 mm (95% CI: 0.10至0.30mm), CARE S组AL减少0.17 mm(0.07至0.26mm)。结论在2年的时间里,与SV镜片相比,含有CARE的镜片显著减缓了近视的进展。
Efficacy of cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) spectacle lenses in slowing myopia progression over 2 years.
PURPOSE
To evaluate over a 2-year period, the efficacy of spectacle lenses incorporating cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) in slowing myopia progression compared to single vision (SV) spectacle wear.
DESIGN
Double-masked, multi-center, randomized clinical trial.
METHODS
A total of 240 Chinese children aged 6-13 yrs, spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) -0.75D to -5.00D were randomized to one of three groups of SV spectacle lens, CARE spectacles (7mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone incorporating CARE with mean surface power +4.6D), and CARE S (9mm central clear zone surrounded by treatment zone comprising CARE with mean surface power +3.8D). Cycloplegic SE and axial length (AL) were measured at six-monthly intervals.
RESULTS
Progression (mean ± SD) in SV wearing eyes after 24 months of SPL wear was -1.15 ± 0.63 D/ 0.59 ± 0.26 mm with SV for SE/AL, respectively. In comparison, myopia progression was significantly slower with both CARE-0.73 ± 0.63D/ 0.40 ± 0.26 mm, p<.0001 and CARE S -0.80 ± 0.56D/ 0.44 ± 0.25 mm, p<.0001. Progression did not differ significantly between CARE lenses. Adjusting for site, group, age, gender and baseline value at 24 months, CARE showed an absolute difference in SE of 0.44D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) and CARE S 0.41D (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.66D) compared to SV. AL reduction was 0.20 mm (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.30mm) with CARE and 0.17 mm (0.07 to 0.26mm) with CARE S as compared to SV.
CONCLUSIONS
Over a 2-year period, lenses incorporating CARE significantly slowed myopia progression as compared to SV lenses.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.