{"title":"用帽形夹板保守治疗儿童下颌骨骨折的系统综述。","authors":"Namita Kumari, Jhunjhunwala Garima, Morankar Rahul, Nitesh Tewari, Vijay Prakash Mathur, Kalpana Bansal","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01405-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandible is the second most common bone involved among pediatric facial fractures, and the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique used for its management results in faster bone remodeling and quicker functional recovery. However, it can lead to damage to the periosteum and surrounding tooth buds, and may require a second surgery for removal. Therefore, conservative methods always remain mainstay for management among pediatric patients. This systematic review evaluates the use of cap splints in managing pediatric mandibular fractures and compares this approach with other closed reduction methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A priori protocol was prepared, and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024531959). A comprehensive literature search was performed electronically in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus till December 31, 2024, whereas a grey literature search was carried out on Google Scholar and open grey. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies by using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports, case series, and retrospective cohort studies. For a prospective cohort study, the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The database search revealed 2308 records, and 48 records were obtained from grey literature and citation search. A total of 47 studies (28 case reports, 13 case series, three retrospective studies, and three prospective non-randomized interventions) were finally included in the review. The different modalities used were cap splint with luting cement, circum-mandibular wiring, interdental wiring, and arch bar fixation. Among the included studies, one case report and three case series had a high risk of bias. Similarly, all retrospective studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cap splint can be recommended as a treatment option for non-displaced pediatric mandibular fractures that do not involve the condyle. Luting cement can be used as an alternative to circum-mandibular wiring.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative management of pediatric mandibular fractures with cap splints- A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Namita Kumari, Jhunjhunwala Garima, Morankar Rahul, Nitesh Tewari, Vijay Prakash Mathur, Kalpana Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01405-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandible is the second most common bone involved among pediatric facial fractures, and the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique used for its management results in faster bone remodeling and quicker functional recovery. However, it can lead to damage to the periosteum and surrounding tooth buds, and may require a second surgery for removal. Therefore, conservative methods always remain mainstay for management among pediatric patients. This systematic review evaluates the use of cap splints in managing pediatric mandibular fractures and compares this approach with other closed reduction methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A priori protocol was prepared, and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024531959). A comprehensive literature search was performed electronically in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus till December 31, 2024, whereas a grey literature search was carried out on Google Scholar and open grey. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies by using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports, case series, and retrospective cohort studies. For a prospective cohort study, the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The database search revealed 2308 records, and 48 records were obtained from grey literature and citation search. A total of 47 studies (28 case reports, 13 case series, three retrospective studies, and three prospective non-randomized interventions) were finally included in the review. The different modalities used were cap splint with luting cement, circum-mandibular wiring, interdental wiring, and arch bar fixation. Among the included studies, one case report and three case series had a high risk of bias. Similarly, all retrospective studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cap splint can be recommended as a treatment option for non-displaced pediatric mandibular fractures that do not involve the condyle. Luting cement can be used as an alternative to circum-mandibular wiring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01405-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01405-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:下颌骨是儿童面部骨折中第二常见的骨骼,切开复位内固定(ORIF)技术用于治疗下颌骨骨折,可以更快地实现骨重塑和功能恢复。然而,它会导致骨膜和周围牙芽的损伤,可能需要第二次手术切除。因此,保守方法始终是儿科患者治疗的主流。本系统综述评估帽形夹板在治疗儿童下颌骨骨折中的应用,并将其与其他闭合复位方法进行比较。方法:编制先验方案,并在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(CRD42024531959)中注册。截止到2024年12月31日,在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Scopus上进行了全面的电子文献检索,在b谷歌Scholar和open grey上进行了灰色文献检索。两名审稿人通过使用适当的乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)对病例报告、病例系列和回顾性队列研究的关键评估清单,独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。对于前瞻性队列研究,采用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险进行质量评估。结果:数据库检索结果为2308条,其中灰色文献和引文检索结果为48条。共纳入47项研究(28项病例报告、13项病例系列、3项回顾性研究和3项前瞻性非随机干预研究)。使用的不同方式有帽式夹板带骨水泥、下颌周金属丝、牙间金属丝和弓棒固定。在纳入的研究中,1个病例报告和3个病例系列具有高偏倚风险。同样,所有的回顾性研究都有较高的偏倚风险。结论:帽形夹板可以推荐作为不累及髁突的非移位儿童下颌骨骨折的治疗选择。Luting水泥可用作下颌周围钢丝的替代方法。
Conservative management of pediatric mandibular fractures with cap splints- A systematic review.
Background: Mandible is the second most common bone involved among pediatric facial fractures, and the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique used for its management results in faster bone remodeling and quicker functional recovery. However, it can lead to damage to the periosteum and surrounding tooth buds, and may require a second surgery for removal. Therefore, conservative methods always remain mainstay for management among pediatric patients. This systematic review evaluates the use of cap splints in managing pediatric mandibular fractures and compares this approach with other closed reduction methods.
Methods: A priori protocol was prepared, and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024531959). A comprehensive literature search was performed electronically in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus till December 31, 2024, whereas a grey literature search was carried out on Google Scholar and open grey. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies by using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for case reports, case series, and retrospective cohort studies. For a prospective cohort study, the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention was used for quality assessment.
Result: The database search revealed 2308 records, and 48 records were obtained from grey literature and citation search. A total of 47 studies (28 case reports, 13 case series, three retrospective studies, and three prospective non-randomized interventions) were finally included in the review. The different modalities used were cap splint with luting cement, circum-mandibular wiring, interdental wiring, and arch bar fixation. Among the included studies, one case report and three case series had a high risk of bias. Similarly, all retrospective studies had a high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Cap splint can be recommended as a treatment option for non-displaced pediatric mandibular fractures that do not involve the condyle. Luting cement can be used as an alternative to circum-mandibular wiring.