扫描源光学相干断层血管造影与光谱域光学相干断层血管造影在5种不同层位中老年黄斑变性患者绒毛膜毛细血管灌注的比较

Nuria Torrell-Belzach, Eric H Souied, Hoang Mai Le, Manal Benlahbib, Zoe Dobbels, Ambroisine Erasti Gounfle, Xavier X Wang, Camille Jung, Alexandra Miere
{"title":"扫描源光学相干断层血管造影与光谱域光学相干断层血管造影在5种不同层位中老年黄斑变性患者绒毛膜毛细血管灌注的比较","authors":"Nuria Torrell-Belzach, Eric H Souied, Hoang Mai Le, Manal Benlahbib, Zoe Dobbels, Ambroisine Erasti Gounfle, Xavier X Wang, Camille Jung, Alexandra Miere","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06874-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SD-OCTA) in five CC slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study of 23 eyes of 20 patients who underwent three 3 × 3 mm OCTA, one with SS-OCTA and two with SD-OCTA, a non-averaged scan (V1) and a four-scan volume (V4). Percentage of flow deficits (FD%), average size of FD (µm2), total area of FD (mm2) and number of FD were calculated in different CC slabs (automatic, 11-21 μm, 21-31 μm, 31-41 μm, 16-31 μm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in all parameters and all slabs analyzed, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V1 and SD-OCTA V1 versus SD-OCTA V4. Nevertheless, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V4, significant differences were only found for the automatic and the 31-41 μm slab. When comparing the FD% between different slabs on the same device, significant differences were also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantification of CC FD% is impacted by the CC slab, the type of OCTA used, and volume averaging in SD-OCTA. Given the significant impact on quantitative results, comparisons between studies and instruments and/or with/without averaging are difficult, even at the same slab depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of choriocapillaris perfusion between swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography in five different choriocapillaris slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration.\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Torrell-Belzach, Eric H Souied, Hoang Mai Le, Manal Benlahbib, Zoe Dobbels, Ambroisine Erasti Gounfle, Xavier X Wang, Camille Jung, Alexandra Miere\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-025-06874-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SD-OCTA) in five CC slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study of 23 eyes of 20 patients who underwent three 3 × 3 mm OCTA, one with SS-OCTA and two with SD-OCTA, a non-averaged scan (V1) and a four-scan volume (V4). Percentage of flow deficits (FD%), average size of FD (µm2), total area of FD (mm2) and number of FD were calculated in different CC slabs (automatic, 11-21 μm, 21-31 μm, 31-41 μm, 16-31 μm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in all parameters and all slabs analyzed, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V1 and SD-OCTA V1 versus SD-OCTA V4. Nevertheless, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V4, significant differences were only found for the automatic and the 31-41 μm slab. When comparing the FD% between different slabs on the same device, significant differences were also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantification of CC FD% is impacted by the CC slab, the type of OCTA used, and volume averaging in SD-OCTA. Given the significant impact on quantitative results, comparisons between studies and instruments and/or with/without averaging are difficult, even at the same slab depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06874-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06874-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用扫描源光学相干断层血管造影(SS-OCTA)和光谱域光学相干断层血管造影(SD-OCTA)分析5例中度年龄相关性黄斑变性(iAMD)患者的绒毛膜毛细血管(CC)灌注情况。方法:对20例23眼患者进行3次3 × 3 mm OCTA, 1次SS-OCTA, 2次SD-OCTA,非平均扫描(V1)和4扫描容积(V4)的横断面研究。计算不同CC板(自动、11-21 μm、21-31 μm、31-41 μm、16-31 μm)的流量亏缺率(FD%)、FD平均尺寸(µm2)、FD总面积(mm2)和FD数量。结果:SS-OCTA与SD-OCTA V1、SD-OCTA V1与SD-OCTA V4比较,各参数及各板分析均有统计学差异。然而,当比较SS-OCTA和SD-OCTA V4时,只有在自动板和31-41 μm板上发现了显著差异。在同一设备上,不同板间FD%的比较也有显著差异。结论:SD-OCTA中CC FD%的定量受CC板、使用的OCTA类型和体积平均的影响。考虑到对定量结果的重大影响,即使在相同的板深下,研究和仪器之间的比较和/或使用/不使用平均也是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of choriocapillaris perfusion between swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography in five different choriocapillaris slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration.

Purpose: To analyze choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography (SD-OCTA) in five CC slabs in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 23 eyes of 20 patients who underwent three 3 × 3 mm OCTA, one with SS-OCTA and two with SD-OCTA, a non-averaged scan (V1) and a four-scan volume (V4). Percentage of flow deficits (FD%), average size of FD (µm2), total area of FD (mm2) and number of FD were calculated in different CC slabs (automatic, 11-21 μm, 21-31 μm, 31-41 μm, 16-31 μm).

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in all parameters and all slabs analyzed, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V1 and SD-OCTA V1 versus SD-OCTA V4. Nevertheless, when comparing SS-OCTA versus SD-OCTA V4, significant differences were only found for the automatic and the 31-41 μm slab. When comparing the FD% between different slabs on the same device, significant differences were also found.

Conclusion: Quantification of CC FD% is impacted by the CC slab, the type of OCTA used, and volume averaging in SD-OCTA. Given the significant impact on quantitative results, comparisons between studies and instruments and/or with/without averaging are difficult, even at the same slab depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信