在一项大型德国患者队列中,与放疗相比,手术治疗T1/2 N0 M0声门癌可获得更好的喉保存时间。

Manuel Christoph Ketterer, Thomas K Hoffmann, Simon Laban, Alexander Berghaus, Martin Canis, Christian Jacobi, Jens Peter Klussmann, Wendelin Foeringer, Roland Laszig, Jens Pfeiffer, Henning Bier, Andreas Knopf
{"title":"在一项大型德国患者队列中,与放疗相比,手术治疗T1/2 N0 M0声门癌可获得更好的喉保存时间。","authors":"Manuel Christoph Ketterer, Thomas K Hoffmann, Simon Laban, Alexander Berghaus, Martin Canis, Christian Jacobi, Jens Peter Klussmann, Wendelin Foeringer, Roland Laszig, Jens Pfeiffer, Henning Bier, Andreas Knopf","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09460-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study examined overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and laryngeal preservation time in a large cohort of 663 patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer after transoral laser or open surgery vs radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 595 surgically treated patients and 68 individuals after definitive radio(chemo)therapy (R (C)-T) were studied. Patient characteristics including sociological, surgical, and pathological data, OS and RFS as well as laryngeal preservation time were recorded and compared between various groups/cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between surgically treated and conservatively treated patients. However, laryngeal preservation time was significantly higher in surgically treated patients (p < 0.001) (mean: 138.3 ± 2.2 months, versus 102.8 ± 7.6 months) than those under conservative treatment. The surgical treatment method (transoral vs. open partial resection) did not influence OS or RFS. Additionally, the rate of transoral vs. open surgery did not change over a decade. T2-stage patients showed significantly lower RFS than T1-stage patients. Initial R status significantly influenced OS and tumor recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study exhibited a significantly longer laryngeal preservation time in patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer treated surgically than in those treated with radiotherapy. No significant differences in OS or RFS were observed between open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser surgery. The R status had a significant impact on OS and RFS, with OS being significantly associated with an R0 status, regardless of T status or the surgical approach (open versus transoral). Laryngeal preservation surgery is recommended as a central therapeutic strategy for T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer because it has a higher laryngeal preservation rate than the conservative treatment. Given the high recurrence rate (18.5%) and the necessity of laryngo- (pharyng) ectomy in a substantial proportion of recurrent patients (7.7%), the choice of initial therapeutic approach is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgery of T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer results in a better laryngeal preservation time compared to radiotherapy in a large German patient cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Christoph Ketterer, Thomas K Hoffmann, Simon Laban, Alexander Berghaus, Martin Canis, Christian Jacobi, Jens Peter Klussmann, Wendelin Foeringer, Roland Laszig, Jens Pfeiffer, Henning Bier, Andreas Knopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09460-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study examined overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and laryngeal preservation time in a large cohort of 663 patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer after transoral laser or open surgery vs radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 595 surgically treated patients and 68 individuals after definitive radio(chemo)therapy (R (C)-T) were studied. Patient characteristics including sociological, surgical, and pathological data, OS and RFS as well as laryngeal preservation time were recorded and compared between various groups/cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between surgically treated and conservatively treated patients. However, laryngeal preservation time was significantly higher in surgically treated patients (p < 0.001) (mean: 138.3 ± 2.2 months, versus 102.8 ± 7.6 months) than those under conservative treatment. The surgical treatment method (transoral vs. open partial resection) did not influence OS or RFS. Additionally, the rate of transoral vs. open surgery did not change over a decade. T2-stage patients showed significantly lower RFS than T1-stage patients. Initial R status significantly influenced OS and tumor recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study exhibited a significantly longer laryngeal preservation time in patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer treated surgically than in those treated with radiotherapy. No significant differences in OS or RFS were observed between open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser surgery. The R status had a significant impact on OS and RFS, with OS being significantly associated with an R0 status, regardless of T status or the surgical approach (open versus transoral). Laryngeal preservation surgery is recommended as a central therapeutic strategy for T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer because it has a higher laryngeal preservation rate than the conservative treatment. Given the high recurrence rate (18.5%) and the necessity of laryngo- (pharyng) ectomy in a substantial proportion of recurrent patients (7.7%), the choice of initial therapeutic approach is critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09460-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09460-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究对663例经口激光或开放手术与放疗后的T1/2 N0 M0声门癌患者的总生存率(OS)、无复发生存率(RFS)和喉保存时间进行了比较。方法:对595例手术患者和68例终期放化疗(R (C)-T)患者进行研究。记录患者特征,包括社会学、外科和病理数据、OS和RFS以及喉保存时间,并在不同组/队列之间进行比较。结果:手术治疗组与保守治疗组的OS和RFS无显著差异。结论:本研究结果显示,手术治疗的T1/2 N0 M0声门癌患者的喉保存时间明显长于放疗治疗的患者。切开喉部切除术与经口激光手术的OS和RFS无显著差异。R状态对OS和RFS有显著影响,而OS与R0状态显著相关,与T状态或手术入路(开放还是经口)无关。喉保留手术被推荐为T1/2 N0 M0声门癌的主要治疗策略,因为它比保守治疗有更高的喉保留率。鉴于高复发率(18.5%)和相当比例的复发患者(7.7%)需要喉(咽)切除术,初始治疗方法的选择至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgery of T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer results in a better laryngeal preservation time compared to radiotherapy in a large German patient cohort.

Objective: This retrospective study examined overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and laryngeal preservation time in a large cohort of 663 patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer after transoral laser or open surgery vs radiotherapy.

Methods: A total of 595 surgically treated patients and 68 individuals after definitive radio(chemo)therapy (R (C)-T) were studied. Patient characteristics including sociological, surgical, and pathological data, OS and RFS as well as laryngeal preservation time were recorded and compared between various groups/cohorts.

Results: There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between surgically treated and conservatively treated patients. However, laryngeal preservation time was significantly higher in surgically treated patients (p < 0.001) (mean: 138.3 ± 2.2 months, versus 102.8 ± 7.6 months) than those under conservative treatment. The surgical treatment method (transoral vs. open partial resection) did not influence OS or RFS. Additionally, the rate of transoral vs. open surgery did not change over a decade. T2-stage patients showed significantly lower RFS than T1-stage patients. Initial R status significantly influenced OS and tumor recurrence.

Conclusion: The findings of this study exhibited a significantly longer laryngeal preservation time in patients with T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer treated surgically than in those treated with radiotherapy. No significant differences in OS or RFS were observed between open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser surgery. The R status had a significant impact on OS and RFS, with OS being significantly associated with an R0 status, regardless of T status or the surgical approach (open versus transoral). Laryngeal preservation surgery is recommended as a central therapeutic strategy for T1/2 N0 M0 glottic cancer because it has a higher laryngeal preservation rate than the conservative treatment. Given the high recurrence rate (18.5%) and the necessity of laryngo- (pharyng) ectomy in a substantial proportion of recurrent patients (7.7%), the choice of initial therapeutic approach is critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信