Aaron Simpson , Mark R. Beauchamp , James Dimmock , Claire Willis , Ben Jackson
{"title":"健康行为改变:新一代体育活动研究的理论、进展和建议。","authors":"Aaron Simpson , Mark R. Beauchamp , James Dimmock , Claire Willis , Ben Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive behaviour change is central to improving population health, yet poor adoption of health-enhancing behaviours contributes to noncommunicable diseases and so remains a global concern. Research on physical activity behaviour change has continued to expand and evolve since the turn of the millennium, guided by diverse theoretical approaches—from social cognitive theories, organismic dialectical approaches such as Self-Determination Theory, dual-process frameworks, and integrated practical models and taxonomies. Key challenges and opportunities remain, however, and in this paper we offer several calls to action for those working to advance physical activity behaviour change theory, research, and practice. First, we advocate for more precise examination of behaviour <em>change</em> itself, moving beyond static models to incorporate dynamic theories and methodologies (including data analysis) that better capture how behaviours evolve and change over time. Second, we emphasise the need to prioritise behaviour maintenance, recognising that many interventions succeed in initiating change but fail to support long-term adherence. Third, we call for a concerted effort to broaden our target populations in behaviour change research, ensuring that interventions (and the theories that inform them) are more inclusive, widely applicable, contextually relevant, and equitable. Finally, we highlight the growing recognition of automatic processes in shaping physical activity behaviours and outline the importance of refining measurement tools and intervention strategies to account for these non-conscious influences. These considerations are articulated with a view to supporting the next generation of physical activity behaviour change research and practice, and in doing so contribute to improved population health equity and outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health behaviour change: Theories, progress, and recommendations for the next generation of physical activity research\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Simpson , Mark R. Beauchamp , James Dimmock , Claire Willis , Ben Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adaptive behaviour change is central to improving population health, yet poor adoption of health-enhancing behaviours contributes to noncommunicable diseases and so remains a global concern. Research on physical activity behaviour change has continued to expand and evolve since the turn of the millennium, guided by diverse theoretical approaches—from social cognitive theories, organismic dialectical approaches such as Self-Determination Theory, dual-process frameworks, and integrated practical models and taxonomies. Key challenges and opportunities remain, however, and in this paper we offer several calls to action for those working to advance physical activity behaviour change theory, research, and practice. First, we advocate for more precise examination of behaviour <em>change</em> itself, moving beyond static models to incorporate dynamic theories and methodologies (including data analysis) that better capture how behaviours evolve and change over time. Second, we emphasise the need to prioritise behaviour maintenance, recognising that many interventions succeed in initiating change but fail to support long-term adherence. Third, we call for a concerted effort to broaden our target populations in behaviour change research, ensuring that interventions (and the theories that inform them) are more inclusive, widely applicable, contextually relevant, and equitable. Finally, we highlight the growing recognition of automatic processes in shaping physical activity behaviours and outline the importance of refining measurement tools and intervention strategies to account for these non-conscious influences. These considerations are articulated with a view to supporting the next generation of physical activity behaviour change research and practice, and in doing so contribute to improved population health equity and outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health behaviour change: Theories, progress, and recommendations for the next generation of physical activity research
Adaptive behaviour change is central to improving population health, yet poor adoption of health-enhancing behaviours contributes to noncommunicable diseases and so remains a global concern. Research on physical activity behaviour change has continued to expand and evolve since the turn of the millennium, guided by diverse theoretical approaches—from social cognitive theories, organismic dialectical approaches such as Self-Determination Theory, dual-process frameworks, and integrated practical models and taxonomies. Key challenges and opportunities remain, however, and in this paper we offer several calls to action for those working to advance physical activity behaviour change theory, research, and practice. First, we advocate for more precise examination of behaviour change itself, moving beyond static models to incorporate dynamic theories and methodologies (including data analysis) that better capture how behaviours evolve and change over time. Second, we emphasise the need to prioritise behaviour maintenance, recognising that many interventions succeed in initiating change but fail to support long-term adherence. Third, we call for a concerted effort to broaden our target populations in behaviour change research, ensuring that interventions (and the theories that inform them) are more inclusive, widely applicable, contextually relevant, and equitable. Finally, we highlight the growing recognition of automatic processes in shaping physical activity behaviours and outline the importance of refining measurement tools and intervention strategies to account for these non-conscious influences. These considerations are articulated with a view to supporting the next generation of physical activity behaviour change research and practice, and in doing so contribute to improved population health equity and outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.