{"title":"血管内动脉瘤修复后囊收缩:三种支架移植的多中心比较数据。","authors":"Koichi Morisaki, Daisuke Matsuda, Ken Nakayama, Atsushi Guntani, Kazuomi Iwasa, Shinichiro Yoshino, Kentaro Inoue, Masazumi Kume, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Multicentre Comparative Data from Three Stent Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Morisaki, Daisuke Matsuda, Ken Nakayama, Atsushi Guntani, Kazuomi Iwasa, Shinichiro Yoshino, Kentaro Inoue, Masazumi Kume, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Multicentre Comparative Data from Three Stent Grafts.
Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.
Methods: This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.
Results: Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).
Conclusion: Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.