血管内动脉瘤修复后囊收缩:三种支架移植的多中心比较数据。

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Koichi Morisaki, Daisuke Matsuda, Ken Nakayama, Atsushi Guntani, Kazuomi Iwasa, Shinichiro Yoshino, Kentaro Inoue, Masazumi Kume, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
{"title":"血管内动脉瘤修复后囊收缩:三种支架移植的多中心比较数据。","authors":"Koichi Morisaki, Daisuke Matsuda, Ken Nakayama, Atsushi Guntani, Kazuomi Iwasa, Shinichiro Yoshino, Kentaro Inoue, Masazumi Kume, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Multicentre Comparative Data from Three Stent Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Morisaki, Daisuke Matsuda, Ken Nakayama, Atsushi Guntani, Kazuomi Iwasa, Shinichiro Yoshino, Kentaro Inoue, Masazumi Kume, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)囊收缩已被报道为血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后治疗成功的替代标志。本研究旨在比较主动脉支架与Endurant和exuder支架治疗后的囊腔收缩。方法:这项回顾性、多中心队列研究分析了2014年至2021年间使用Aorfix、enduant或exuder装置治疗的444例EVAR后AAA患者的数据。囊缩定义为最大动脉瘤直径减小≥5mm。主要终点包括囊缩及囊缩相关因素在EVAR后一年内。次要终点包括再干预、Ia型内膜渗漏(T1aEL)、动脉瘤相关死亡(ARD)和总生存期。结果:在444例患者中,88例使用了Aorfix, 191例使用了Endurant, 165例使用了exuder。主动脉组、持久组和排除组一年内囊袋收缩率分别为52.1%、32.8%和34.0% (p = 0.003)。多因素分析显示,与Endurant或exuder装置相比,使用Aorfix装置治疗的患者在一年内囊袋收缩更好,囊袋收缩是EVAR后再次干预自由和T1aEL的良好替代指标。然而,回顾性研究设计可能会引入偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Multicentre Comparative Data from Three Stent Grafts.

Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage has been reported as a surrogate marker of treatment success after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare sac shrinkage after treatment with the Aorfix stent graft with that of Endurant and Excluder devices.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data for 444 patients with AAA after EVAR who were treated with Aorfix, Endurant, or Excluder devices between 2014 and 2021. Sac shrinkage was defined as a decrease in the maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Primary endpoints included sac shrinkage and factors related to sac shrinkage within one year after EVAR. Secondary endpoints included re-intervention, type Ia endoleak (T1aEL), aneurysm related death (ARD), and overall survival.

Results: Of the 444 patients, 88 were treated with Aorfix, 191 with Endurant, and 165 with the Excluder. Sac shrinkage rates within one year in the Aorfix, Endurant, and Excluder groups were 52.1%, 32.8%, and 34.0%, respectively (p = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Aorfix device (ref. Endurant, p < .001; ref. Excluder, p = .010), smaller proximal neck diameter (p = .004), and number of patent lumbar arteries less than four (p = .033) were positive factors for sac shrinkage within one year. Rates of re-intervention and T1aEL were lower in the sac shrinkage group within one year than in the group without sac shrinkage within one year. The ARD rate at ten years was 3.8% in the no shrinkage group and 0.7% in the shrinkage group (p= .29).

Conclusion: Sac shrinkage within one year was better in patients treated with the Aorfix device than in those treated with Endurant or Excluder devices, and sac shrinkage was a good surrogate marker for freedom from re-intervention and T1aEL after EVAR. However, the retrospective study design may introduce bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信