重新思考孕妇的均衡食物补充:是时候超越能量和蛋白质了。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Kathryn G Dewey, Sonja Y Hess, Nancy J Krebs, Christine McDonald, Sophie E Moore, Christine P Stewart, K Ryan Wessells
{"title":"重新思考孕妇的均衡食物补充:是时候超越能量和蛋白质了。","authors":"Kathryn G Dewey, Sonja Y Hess, Nancy J Krebs, Christine McDonald, Sophie E Moore, Christine P Stewart, K Ryan Wessells","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"balanced energy and protein (BEP)\" supplementation during pregnancy arose from research conducted >40 y ago, and has been defined as food supplements with <25% of energy from protein. BEP supplementation is recommended for undernourished populations by the World Health Organization, although the evidence base for this includes highly heterogeneous products and comparison groups. In this perspective, we briefly outline limitations in the evidence base for BEP supplementation and argue that the term diverts attention away from other important elements of \"balance,\" such as healthy fats and carbohydrates. We articulate the need to carefully consider the goals of food supplementation during pregnancy, the biological mechanisms underlying effects on key outcomes, the desirability of flexibility in approaches, cost considerations, and the needs of the entire household in the context of food insecurity. We conclude that it is time to redefine the concept of balanced food supplementation for pregnant women, clarify objectives and terminology, and conduct further research relevant to the current global context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking balanced food supplementation for pregnant women: time to move beyond energy and protein.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn G Dewey, Sonja Y Hess, Nancy J Krebs, Christine McDonald, Sophie E Moore, Christine P Stewart, K Ryan Wessells\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The term \\\"balanced energy and protein (BEP)\\\" supplementation during pregnancy arose from research conducted >40 y ago, and has been defined as food supplements with <25% of energy from protein. BEP supplementation is recommended for undernourished populations by the World Health Organization, although the evidence base for this includes highly heterogeneous products and comparison groups. In this perspective, we briefly outline limitations in the evidence base for BEP supplementation and argue that the term diverts attention away from other important elements of \\\"balance,\\\" such as healthy fats and carbohydrates. We articulate the need to carefully consider the goals of food supplementation during pregnancy, the biological mechanisms underlying effects on key outcomes, the desirability of flexibility in approaches, cost considerations, and the needs of the entire household in the context of food insecurity. We conclude that it is time to redefine the concept of balanced food supplementation for pregnant women, clarify objectives and terminology, and conduct further research relevant to the current global context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

怀孕期间补充“平衡能量和蛋白质(BEP)”一词源于40多年前的一项研究,它被定义为蛋白质能量含量低于25%的食物补充剂。世界卫生组织建议营养不良人群补充BEP,尽管这方面的证据基础包括高度异质的产品和比较组。在这一观点中,我们简要概述了BEP补充证据基础的局限性,并认为该术语转移了对“平衡”其他重要元素的关注,如健康脂肪和碳水化合物。我们明确指出,在粮食不安全的背景下,需要仔细考虑怀孕期间食物补充的目标、对关键结果的潜在影响的生物学机制、方法灵活性的可取性、成本考虑以及整个家庭的需求。我们的结论是,现在是时候重新定义孕妇均衡食物补充的概念,明确目标和术语,并开展与当前全球背景相关的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking balanced food supplementation for pregnant women: time to move beyond energy and protein.

The term "balanced energy and protein (BEP)" supplementation during pregnancy arose from research conducted >40 y ago, and has been defined as food supplements with <25% of energy from protein. BEP supplementation is recommended for undernourished populations by the World Health Organization, although the evidence base for this includes highly heterogeneous products and comparison groups. In this perspective, we briefly outline limitations in the evidence base for BEP supplementation and argue that the term diverts attention away from other important elements of "balance," such as healthy fats and carbohydrates. We articulate the need to carefully consider the goals of food supplementation during pregnancy, the biological mechanisms underlying effects on key outcomes, the desirability of flexibility in approaches, cost considerations, and the needs of the entire household in the context of food insecurity. We conclude that it is time to redefine the concept of balanced food supplementation for pregnant women, clarify objectives and terminology, and conduct further research relevant to the current global context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信