关于伸展运动的实用建议:国际研究专家的德尔菲共识声明。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Konstantin Warneke, Ewan Thomas, Anthony J Blazevich, José Afonso, David G Behm, Paulo H Marchetti, Gabriel S Trajano, Masatoshi Nakamura, Francisco Ayala, Stefano Longo, Nicolas Babault, Sandro R Freitas, Pablo B Costa, Andreas Konrad, Antoine Nordez, Arnold Nelson, Astrid Zech, Anthony D Kay, Olyvia Donti, Jan Wilke
{"title":"关于伸展运动的实用建议:国际研究专家的德尔菲共识声明。","authors":"Konstantin Warneke, Ewan Thomas, Anthony J Blazevich, José Afonso, David G Behm, Paulo H Marchetti, Gabriel S Trajano, Masatoshi Nakamura, Francisco Ayala, Stefano Longo, Nicolas Babault, Sandro R Freitas, Pablo B Costa, Andreas Konrad, Antoine Nordez, Arnold Nelson, Astrid Zech, Anthony D Kay, Olyvia Donti, Jan Wilke","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching has wide appeal, but there seems to exist some mismatch between its purported applications and what the evidence shows. There is compelling evidence for some stretching applications, but for others, the evidence seems heterogeneous or unsupportive. The discrepancies even affect some systematic reviews, possibly due to heterogeneous eligibility criteria and search strategies. This consensus paper seeks to unify the divergent findings on stretching and its implications for both athletic performance and clinical practices by delivering evidence-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 20 experts with a blend of practical experience and scholarly knowledge was assembled. The panel meticulously reviewed existing systematic reviews, defined key terminologies (e.g., consensus definitions for different stretching modes), and crafted guidelines using a Delphi consensus approach (minimum required agreement: 80%). The analysis focused on 8 topics, including stretching's acute and chronic (long-term) effects on range of motion, strength performance, muscle hypertrophy, stiffness, injury prevention, muscle recovery, posture correction, and cardiovascular health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was consensus that chronic and acute stretching (a) improves range of motion (although alternatives exist) and (b) reduces muscle stiffness (which may not always be desirable); the panel also agreed that chronic stretching (c) may promote vascular health, but more research is warranted. In contrast, consensus was found that stretch training does not (a) contribute substantively to muscle growth, (b) serve as an all-encompassing injury prevention strategy, (c) improve posture, or (d) acutely enhance post-exercise recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These recommendations provide guidance for athletes and practitioners, highlighting research gaps that should be addressed to more comprehensively understand the full scope of stretching effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"101067"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: A Delphi consensus statement of international research experts.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Warneke, Ewan Thomas, Anthony J Blazevich, José Afonso, David G Behm, Paulo H Marchetti, Gabriel S Trajano, Masatoshi Nakamura, Francisco Ayala, Stefano Longo, Nicolas Babault, Sandro R Freitas, Pablo B Costa, Andreas Konrad, Antoine Nordez, Arnold Nelson, Astrid Zech, Anthony D Kay, Olyvia Donti, Jan Wilke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching has wide appeal, but there seems to exist some mismatch between its purported applications and what the evidence shows. There is compelling evidence for some stretching applications, but for others, the evidence seems heterogeneous or unsupportive. The discrepancies even affect some systematic reviews, possibly due to heterogeneous eligibility criteria and search strategies. This consensus paper seeks to unify the divergent findings on stretching and its implications for both athletic performance and clinical practices by delivering evidence-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 20 experts with a blend of practical experience and scholarly knowledge was assembled. The panel meticulously reviewed existing systematic reviews, defined key terminologies (e.g., consensus definitions for different stretching modes), and crafted guidelines using a Delphi consensus approach (minimum required agreement: 80%). The analysis focused on 8 topics, including stretching's acute and chronic (long-term) effects on range of motion, strength performance, muscle hypertrophy, stiffness, injury prevention, muscle recovery, posture correction, and cardiovascular health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was consensus that chronic and acute stretching (a) improves range of motion (although alternatives exist) and (b) reduces muscle stiffness (which may not always be desirable); the panel also agreed that chronic stretching (c) may promote vascular health, but more research is warranted. In contrast, consensus was found that stretch training does not (a) contribute substantively to muscle growth, (b) serve as an all-encompassing injury prevention strategy, (c) improve posture, or (d) acutely enhance post-exercise recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These recommendations provide guidance for athletes and practitioners, highlighting research gaps that should be addressed to more comprehensively understand the full scope of stretching effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拉伸具有广泛的吸引力,但在其声称的应用和证据显示之间似乎存在一些不匹配。对于一些拉伸应用,有令人信服的证据,但对于其他应用,证据似乎不一致或不支持。这些差异甚至影响到一些系统评价,可能是由于不同的资格标准和搜索策略。这篇共识性的论文试图通过提供基于证据的建议来统一拉伸的不同发现及其对运动表现和临床实践的影响。方法:由20位具有实践经验和学术知识的专家组成。专家组仔细审查了现有的系统评价,定义了关键术语(例如,不同拉伸模式的共识定义),并使用德尔菲共识方法制定了指导方针(最低要求的一致性:80%)。分析集中在8个主题上,包括拉伸对运动范围、力量表现、肌肉肥大、僵硬、损伤预防、肌肉恢复、姿势纠正和心血管健康的急性和慢性(长期)影响。结果:人们一致认为慢性和急性拉伸(a)改善活动范围(尽管存在替代方案)和(b)减少肌肉僵硬(这可能并不总是理想的);该小组还同意慢性拉伸(c)可能促进血管健康,但需要更多的研究。相比之下,人们一致认为拉伸训练不能(a)对肌肉生长有实质性的贡献,(b)作为一种全面的伤害预防策略,(c)改善姿势,或(d)急剧增强运动后的恢复。结论:这些建议为运动员和从业人员提供了指导,强调了应该解决的研究空白,以便更全面地了解拉伸效应的全部范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: A Delphi consensus statement of international research experts.

Background: Stretching has wide appeal, but there seems to exist some mismatch between its purported applications and what the evidence shows. There is compelling evidence for some stretching applications, but for others, the evidence seems heterogeneous or unsupportive. The discrepancies even affect some systematic reviews, possibly due to heterogeneous eligibility criteria and search strategies. This consensus paper seeks to unify the divergent findings on stretching and its implications for both athletic performance and clinical practices by delivering evidence-based recommendations.

Methods: A panel of 20 experts with a blend of practical experience and scholarly knowledge was assembled. The panel meticulously reviewed existing systematic reviews, defined key terminologies (e.g., consensus definitions for different stretching modes), and crafted guidelines using a Delphi consensus approach (minimum required agreement: 80%). The analysis focused on 8 topics, including stretching's acute and chronic (long-term) effects on range of motion, strength performance, muscle hypertrophy, stiffness, injury prevention, muscle recovery, posture correction, and cardiovascular health.

Results: There was consensus that chronic and acute stretching (a) improves range of motion (although alternatives exist) and (b) reduces muscle stiffness (which may not always be desirable); the panel also agreed that chronic stretching (c) may promote vascular health, but more research is warranted. In contrast, consensus was found that stretch training does not (a) contribute substantively to muscle growth, (b) serve as an all-encompassing injury prevention strategy, (c) improve posture, or (d) acutely enhance post-exercise recovery.

Conclusion: These recommendations provide guidance for athletes and practitioners, highlighting research gaps that should be addressed to more comprehensively understand the full scope of stretching effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers. With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards. Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信