Torrance Teng, Kyle Crooker, Tess Hickey, Max HoddWells, Ashwini Sarathy, Sean Muniz, Jennifer Lor, Amy Chang, Bradley J Tompkins, Aaron O'Brien, Elly Riser, Devika Singh, Jean Dejace, Andrew J Hale
{"title":"无家可归者感染性心内膜炎的临床特征和结局。","authors":"Torrance Teng, Kyle Crooker, Tess Hickey, Max HoddWells, Ashwini Sarathy, Sean Muniz, Jennifer Lor, Amy Chang, Bradley J Tompkins, Aaron O'Brien, Elly Riser, Devika Singh, Jean Dejace, Andrew J Hale","doi":"10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and current treatment guidelines recommend a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. However, individuals experiencing homelessness face greater barriers to standard IE care. The aim of this study was to compare IE characteristics and outcomes in an unhoused population versus a housed population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study encompassing 2010-2020 was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE who did or did not experience homelessness at the time of their infection. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of microbiologic failure and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 378 included patients with IE, 30 (7.9%) experienced homelessness and 348 (92.1%) did not. The unhoused cohort was more likely to have right-sided IE involving the tricuspid valve (50.0% vs 21.6%, P = 0.006) and for the causative organism to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [9 (30.0%) vs 43 (12.4%), P = 0.039]. Mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates were not significantly different between groups at any time point measured. For secondary outcomes, differences in microbiologic failure [5 (16.7%) vs 36 (10.3%), P = 0.543] and treatment failure [9 (30.0%) vs 105 (30.2%), P = 1.000] were also not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should elucidate factors that entail increased risk of poor outcomes in this important underserved population and how to best mitigate them.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"14 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis in persons experiencing homelessness.\",\"authors\":\"Torrance Teng, Kyle Crooker, Tess Hickey, Max HoddWells, Ashwini Sarathy, Sean Muniz, Jennifer Lor, Amy Chang, Bradley J Tompkins, Aaron O'Brien, Elly Riser, Devika Singh, Jean Dejace, Andrew J Hale\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and current treatment guidelines recommend a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. However, individuals experiencing homelessness face greater barriers to standard IE care. The aim of this study was to compare IE characteristics and outcomes in an unhoused population versus a housed population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study encompassing 2010-2020 was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE who did or did not experience homelessness at the time of their infection. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of microbiologic failure and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 378 included patients with IE, 30 (7.9%) experienced homelessness and 348 (92.1%) did not. The unhoused cohort was more likely to have right-sided IE involving the tricuspid valve (50.0% vs 21.6%, P = 0.006) and for the causative organism to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [9 (30.0%) vs 43 (12.4%), P = 0.039]. Mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates were not significantly different between groups at any time point measured. For secondary outcomes, differences in microbiologic failure [5 (16.7%) vs 36 (10.3%), P = 0.543] and treatment failure [9 (30.0%) vs 105 (30.2%), P = 1.000] were also not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should elucidate factors that entail increased risk of poor outcomes in this important underserved population and how to best mitigate them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases of Poverty\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases of Poverty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis in persons experiencing homelessness.
Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and current treatment guidelines recommend a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. However, individuals experiencing homelessness face greater barriers to standard IE care. The aim of this study was to compare IE characteristics and outcomes in an unhoused population versus a housed population.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing 2010-2020 was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE who did or did not experience homelessness at the time of their infection. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of microbiologic failure and treatment failure.
Results: Of 378 included patients with IE, 30 (7.9%) experienced homelessness and 348 (92.1%) did not. The unhoused cohort was more likely to have right-sided IE involving the tricuspid valve (50.0% vs 21.6%, P = 0.006) and for the causative organism to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [9 (30.0%) vs 43 (12.4%), P = 0.039]. Mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates were not significantly different between groups at any time point measured. For secondary outcomes, differences in microbiologic failure [5 (16.7%) vs 36 (10.3%), P = 0.543] and treatment failure [9 (30.0%) vs 105 (30.2%), P = 1.000] were also not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Future research should elucidate factors that entail increased risk of poor outcomes in this important underserved population and how to best mitigate them.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.