Olivia N. Ferguson , Dennis Jensen , Jordan A. Guenette , Hayley Lewthwaite
{"title":"运动中呼吸困难的多维评估:当前的方法和建议。","authors":"Olivia N. Ferguson , Dennis Jensen , Jordan A. Guenette , Hayley Lewthwaite","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is a complex, multidimensional symptom of breathing discomfort, which significantly impacts quality of life and clinical prognosis. While traditional assessments have primarily focused on breathlessness sensory intensity, this approach does not consider affective and/or qualitative dimensions. Growing evidence highlights the need for multidimensional assessment approaches that provide a more comprehensive understanding of breathlessness, particularly in the context of exercise. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a standardized physiological stimulus to assess breathlessness responses in real-time, offering valuable insights into its underlying mechanisms and response to therapeutic intervention. Normative reference equations can help identify abnormally high breathlessness intensity during CPET. This review examines current methodologies for multidimensional breathlessness assessment during exercise, including single-item rating scales, multidimensional tools, descriptor lists, and locus of symptom limitation. We also discuss best practices for linking breathlessness with physiological responses during CPET to enhance mechanistic understanding, inform targeted interventions, and evaluate interventional efficacy. Standardizing assessment approaches and ensuring transparent reporting are critical steps toward improving the clinical and research utility of exertional breathlessness assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional assessment of breathlessness during exercise: current methods and recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Olivia N. Ferguson , Dennis Jensen , Jordan A. Guenette , Hayley Lewthwaite\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is a complex, multidimensional symptom of breathing discomfort, which significantly impacts quality of life and clinical prognosis. While traditional assessments have primarily focused on breathlessness sensory intensity, this approach does not consider affective and/or qualitative dimensions. Growing evidence highlights the need for multidimensional assessment approaches that provide a more comprehensive understanding of breathlessness, particularly in the context of exercise. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a standardized physiological stimulus to assess breathlessness responses in real-time, offering valuable insights into its underlying mechanisms and response to therapeutic intervention. Normative reference equations can help identify abnormally high breathlessness intensity during CPET. This review examines current methodologies for multidimensional breathlessness assessment during exercise, including single-item rating scales, multidimensional tools, descriptor lists, and locus of symptom limitation. We also discuss best practices for linking breathlessness with physiological responses during CPET to enhance mechanistic understanding, inform targeted interventions, and evaluate interventional efficacy. Standardizing assessment approaches and ensuring transparent reporting are critical steps toward improving the clinical and research utility of exertional breathlessness assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"336 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000679\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multidimensional assessment of breathlessness during exercise: current methods and recommendations
Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is a complex, multidimensional symptom of breathing discomfort, which significantly impacts quality of life and clinical prognosis. While traditional assessments have primarily focused on breathlessness sensory intensity, this approach does not consider affective and/or qualitative dimensions. Growing evidence highlights the need for multidimensional assessment approaches that provide a more comprehensive understanding of breathlessness, particularly in the context of exercise. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a standardized physiological stimulus to assess breathlessness responses in real-time, offering valuable insights into its underlying mechanisms and response to therapeutic intervention. Normative reference equations can help identify abnormally high breathlessness intensity during CPET. This review examines current methodologies for multidimensional breathlessness assessment during exercise, including single-item rating scales, multidimensional tools, descriptor lists, and locus of symptom limitation. We also discuss best practices for linking breathlessness with physiological responses during CPET to enhance mechanistic understanding, inform targeted interventions, and evaluate interventional efficacy. Standardizing assessment approaches and ensuring transparent reporting are critical steps toward improving the clinical and research utility of exertional breathlessness assessments.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.