在巴西土著居民中验证粮食安全经验量表。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ana Maria Segall-Corrêa, Verônica Gronau Luz, Marta Maria do Amaral Azevedo, Beatriz Rocha Ferreira, Laure Emperaire, Deoclecio Rocco Gruppi, Letícia Marín-Leon, Juliana Souza Andrade Licio, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
{"title":"在巴西土著居民中验证粮食安全经验量表。","authors":"Ana Maria Segall-Corrêa, Verônica Gronau Luz, Marta Maria do Amaral Azevedo, Beatriz Rocha Ferreira, Laure Emperaire, Deoclecio Rocco Gruppi, Letícia Marín-Leon, Juliana Souza Andrade Licio, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02515-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing food and nutrition security among indigenous populations in Brazil is challenging due to their significant cultural and linguistic diversity. This study aimed to validate a national food insecurity measurement scale for indigenous peoples in Brazil (EBIA-I).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 495 indigenous households, from 15 rural communities and one urban area, were included in the analyses. Internal psychometric validity scale was tested with the Rasch Model, and external validity was examined with bivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An 8-item scale was internally valid (Infit values ranged between 0.7 and 1.3), 6 of the items referred to households with children under 16 years of age, 5 to households only with residents aged 16 years or more, with 3 being common to both. The external validity of the EBIA-I was high, as shown by the significantly lower prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, in households where some members regularly received income vs. those not receiving any income, 17.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively. Likewise, interviewees who self-reported good/very good health vs. poor/very poor health status were less likely to experience moderate or severe food insecurity (19.1% vs. 34.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EBIA-I is a valid scale with strong potential to inform decisions by policymakers and to support indigenous organizations monitoring, addressing, and advocating for policies to prevent or mitigate food and nutrition insecurity in their communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a food security experience scale among indigenous populations in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Maria Segall-Corrêa, Verônica Gronau Luz, Marta Maria do Amaral Azevedo, Beatriz Rocha Ferreira, Laure Emperaire, Deoclecio Rocco Gruppi, Letícia Marín-Leon, Juliana Souza Andrade Licio, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02515-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing food and nutrition security among indigenous populations in Brazil is challenging due to their significant cultural and linguistic diversity. This study aimed to validate a national food insecurity measurement scale for indigenous peoples in Brazil (EBIA-I).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 495 indigenous households, from 15 rural communities and one urban area, were included in the analyses. Internal psychometric validity scale was tested with the Rasch Model, and external validity was examined with bivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An 8-item scale was internally valid (Infit values ranged between 0.7 and 1.3), 6 of the items referred to households with children under 16 years of age, 5 to households only with residents aged 16 years or more, with 3 being common to both. The external validity of the EBIA-I was high, as shown by the significantly lower prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, in households where some members regularly received income vs. those not receiving any income, 17.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively. Likewise, interviewees who self-reported good/very good health vs. poor/very poor health status were less likely to experience moderate or severe food insecurity (19.1% vs. 34.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EBIA-I is a valid scale with strong potential to inform decisions by policymakers and to support indigenous organizations monitoring, addressing, and advocating for policies to prevent or mitigate food and nutrition insecurity in their communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02515-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02515-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于巴西土著人口文化和语言的显著多样性,评估其粮食和营养安全具有挑战性。本研究旨在验证巴西土著人民国家粮食不安全测量量表(EBIA-I)。方法:来自15个农村社区和1个城市地区的495个土著家庭被纳入分析。内部心理测量效度量表采用Rasch模型进行检验,外部效度量表采用双变量分析进行检验。结果:8个条目的量表是内部有效的(Infit值在0.7到1.3之间),其中6个条目是指有16岁以下儿童的家庭,5个是指只有16岁或16岁以上居民的家庭,3个是两者共同的。EBIA-I的外部效度很高,在一些成员定期有收入的家庭中,中度或重度粮食不安全的患病率明显低于没有任何收入的家庭,分别为17.5%和30.6%。同样,自我报告健康状况良好/非常好与健康状况差/非常差的受访者不太可能经历中度或严重的粮食不安全(19.1%对34.8%)。结论:EBIA-I是一个有效的量表,具有很强的潜力,可以为决策者的决策提供信息,并支持土著组织监测、处理和倡导预防或减轻其社区粮食和营养不安全的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a food security experience scale among indigenous populations in Brazil.

Background: Assessing food and nutrition security among indigenous populations in Brazil is challenging due to their significant cultural and linguistic diversity. This study aimed to validate a national food insecurity measurement scale for indigenous peoples in Brazil (EBIA-I).

Methods: A total of 495 indigenous households, from 15 rural communities and one urban area, were included in the analyses. Internal psychometric validity scale was tested with the Rasch Model, and external validity was examined with bivariate analyses.

Results: An 8-item scale was internally valid (Infit values ranged between 0.7 and 1.3), 6 of the items referred to households with children under 16 years of age, 5 to households only with residents aged 16 years or more, with 3 being common to both. The external validity of the EBIA-I was high, as shown by the significantly lower prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, in households where some members regularly received income vs. those not receiving any income, 17.5% vs. 30.6%, respectively. Likewise, interviewees who self-reported good/very good health vs. poor/very poor health status were less likely to experience moderate or severe food insecurity (19.1% vs. 34.8%).

Conclusions: EBIA-I is a valid scale with strong potential to inform decisions by policymakers and to support indigenous organizations monitoring, addressing, and advocating for policies to prevent or mitigate food and nutrition insecurity in their communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信