评估应激超声心动图双产物作为乳腺癌放疗患者主要不良心脏事件的预后指标。

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Juan Manuel Garzon-Dangond, Maria F Gomez Ardila, Eduardo Tellez Garcia, Andres E Daryanani, Prema P Peethambaram, Lori A Thicke, Daniela L Stan, Hector R Villarraga
{"title":"评估应激超声心动图双产物作为乳腺癌放疗患者主要不良心脏事件的预后指标。","authors":"Juan Manuel Garzon-Dangond, Maria F Gomez Ardila, Eduardo Tellez Garcia, Andres E Daryanani, Prema P Peethambaram, Lori A Thicke, Daniela L Stan, Hector R Villarraga","doi":"10.1186/s40959-025-00350-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy (RT) face elevated long-term risk of cardiovascular complications. Double product (DP), the product of systolic blood pressure and heart rate, reflects myocardial workload and may serve as a simple prognostic marker. We evaluated whether peak DP during exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied patients who had breast cancer treated with RT and underwent follow-up testing with ESE or DSE from 2000 through 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between MACE/ACM and risk factors in each group. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare ACM and MACE-free survival among the different DP quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 696 patients. ESE (n = 425) or DSE (n = 271) was performed at a median of 4.4 (IQR, 2.2-7.5) years after RT. For the ESE group, the rate of MACE was higher in the lowest quartile. Patients in the 3rd and 4th quartile had a decreased risk of MACE and ACM (hazard ratio [HR] per 1,000-mm Hg/min increase, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]; P < .001 and HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.96]; P < .001) respectively. Advanced age (> 60 years) was also seen to be a predictor of MACE in this group (HR, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.13-12.75]; P = < .001). Additionally, treatment with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of ACM but not MACE (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.04-3.05]; P = .03). For the DSE group, rate of MACE was similar among DP quartiles, indicating that this is not a prognostic indicator. However, a history of diabetes and dyslipidemia were shown to be predictors of MACE (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.05-2.37]; P = .02; and HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.12-2.79]; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DP achieved during ESE but not DSE is an excellent tool for the prediction of MACE and ACM in this patient population; therefore, ESE should be recommended as the test of choice when possible. A history of atrial fibrillation, diabetes and dyslipidemia were identified as significant predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the DSE group, highlighting individualized monitoring and early intervention for patients at higher risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing double product derived from stress echocardiography as a prognostic indicator of major adverse cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Manuel Garzon-Dangond, Maria F Gomez Ardila, Eduardo Tellez Garcia, Andres E Daryanani, Prema P Peethambaram, Lori A Thicke, Daniela L Stan, Hector R Villarraga\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40959-025-00350-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy (RT) face elevated long-term risk of cardiovascular complications. Double product (DP), the product of systolic blood pressure and heart rate, reflects myocardial workload and may serve as a simple prognostic marker. We evaluated whether peak DP during exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied patients who had breast cancer treated with RT and underwent follow-up testing with ESE or DSE from 2000 through 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between MACE/ACM and risk factors in each group. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare ACM and MACE-free survival among the different DP quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 696 patients. ESE (n = 425) or DSE (n = 271) was performed at a median of 4.4 (IQR, 2.2-7.5) years after RT. For the ESE group, the rate of MACE was higher in the lowest quartile. Patients in the 3rd and 4th quartile had a decreased risk of MACE and ACM (hazard ratio [HR] per 1,000-mm Hg/min increase, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]; P < .001 and HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.96]; P < .001) respectively. Advanced age (> 60 years) was also seen to be a predictor of MACE in this group (HR, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.13-12.75]; P = < .001). Additionally, treatment with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of ACM but not MACE (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.04-3.05]; P = .03). For the DSE group, rate of MACE was similar among DP quartiles, indicating that this is not a prognostic indicator. However, a history of diabetes and dyslipidemia were shown to be predictors of MACE (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.05-2.37]; P = .02; and HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.12-2.79]; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DP achieved during ESE but not DSE is an excellent tool for the prediction of MACE and ACM in this patient population; therefore, ESE should be recommended as the test of choice when possible. A history of atrial fibrillation, diabetes and dyslipidemia were identified as significant predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the DSE group, highlighting individualized monitoring and early intervention for patients at higher risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardio-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00350-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00350-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受放疗(RT)治疗的乳腺癌幸存者面临心血管并发症的长期风险升高。双积(DP),收缩压和心率的乘积,反映心肌负荷,可以作为一个简单的预后指标。我们评估了运动期间DP峰值或多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图是否能预测主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和全因死亡率(ACM)。方法:我们回顾性研究了2000年至2022年间接受RT治疗并接受ESE或DSE随访检测的乳腺癌患者。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型评估各组MACE/ACM与危险因素的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较不同DP四分位数的ACM和无mace生存率。结果:本研究纳入696例患者。ESE (n = 425)或DSE (n = 271)在术后中位数4.4 (IQR, 2.2-7.5)年进行。对于ESE组,最低四分位数的MACE率较高。第3和第4四分位数的患者MACE和ACM的风险降低(每增加1000 -mm Hg/min,风险比[HR]为0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97];p60年)也被认为是该组MACE的预测因子(HR, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.13-12.75];P =结论:在ESE而非DSE期间获得的DP是预测该患者群体MACE和ACM的极好工具;因此,在可能的情况下,应该推荐将ESE作为首选测试。房颤、糖尿病和血脂异常史被确定为DSE组不良心血管结局的重要预测因素,强调对高危患者的个体化监测和早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing double product derived from stress echocardiography as a prognostic indicator of major adverse cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Assessing double product derived from stress echocardiography as a prognostic indicator of major adverse cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Assessing double product derived from stress echocardiography as a prognostic indicator of major adverse cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Assessing double product derived from stress echocardiography as a prognostic indicator of major adverse cardiac events in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Background: Breast cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy (RT) face elevated long-term risk of cardiovascular complications. Double product (DP), the product of systolic blood pressure and heart rate, reflects myocardial workload and may serve as a simple prognostic marker. We evaluated whether peak DP during exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM).

Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who had breast cancer treated with RT and underwent follow-up testing with ESE or DSE from 2000 through 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between MACE/ACM and risk factors in each group. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare ACM and MACE-free survival among the different DP quartiles.

Results: Our study included 696 patients. ESE (n = 425) or DSE (n = 271) was performed at a median of 4.4 (IQR, 2.2-7.5) years after RT. For the ESE group, the rate of MACE was higher in the lowest quartile. Patients in the 3rd and 4th quartile had a decreased risk of MACE and ACM (hazard ratio [HR] per 1,000-mm Hg/min increase, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]; P < .001 and HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.96]; P < .001) respectively. Advanced age (> 60 years) was also seen to be a predictor of MACE in this group (HR, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.13-12.75]; P = < .001). Additionally, treatment with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of ACM but not MACE (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.04-3.05]; P = .03). For the DSE group, rate of MACE was similar among DP quartiles, indicating that this is not a prognostic indicator. However, a history of diabetes and dyslipidemia were shown to be predictors of MACE (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.05-2.37]; P = .02; and HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.12-2.79]; P = .01).

Conclusions: DP achieved during ESE but not DSE is an excellent tool for the prediction of MACE and ACM in this patient population; therefore, ESE should be recommended as the test of choice when possible. A history of atrial fibrillation, diabetes and dyslipidemia were identified as significant predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the DSE group, highlighting individualized monitoring and early intervention for patients at higher risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信