未破裂的大脑中动脉瘤治疗后的功能结局:显微手术与血管内治疗的单中心比较

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Edward Goacher, Matthew I Sanders, Ridhi Surti, Mihai Danciut, Gueorgui Kounin
{"title":"未破裂的大脑中动脉瘤治疗后的功能结局:显微手术与血管内治疗的单中心比较","authors":"Edward Goacher, Matthew I Sanders, Ridhi Surti, Mihai Danciut, Gueorgui Kounin","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2025.2516028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal management of unruptured, middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, remains undetermined between microsurgical clipping and endovascular intervention. This study aims to compare post-operative functional outcomes between microsurgically and endovascularly treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All cases of unruptured MCA aneurysms undergoing treatment during a 10-year time period were identified and included. Functional status (FS) was measured using the Modified Rankin Scale. FS was assessed pre-treatment and at 1-month, 6-months and 12-months post-treatment. Median FS was compared between groups and relative risk ratios (RR) calculated to compare the risk of post-operative deterioration between the microsurgical and endovascular cohort at each time point. Occlusion and retreatment rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 119 cases of treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms were identified, of which 40 (34%) were managed microsurgically and 79 (66%) endovascularly. Mean age was 55 years (SD ± 11). No significant difference was seen in any demographic domain pre-operatively. 30-day survival in both cohorts was 100%. No significant difference in median FS was seen between the cohorts at any time point post-treatment. There was a significantly increased risk of deterioration in FS amongst the microsurgical cohort at 1-month post-treatment (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08 - 3.62, p = 0.03). There was no significant risk of deterioration in FS at either the 6-month nor 12-month time point post-treatment. Complete occlusion in the microsurgical cohort was greater than the endovascular cohort (91% vs. 66%), demonstrating a significantly reduced RR of incomplete occlusion (RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.77, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 1-month post-treatment, the risk of a decline in FS from baseline was almost twice as great in the microsurgical cohort. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of deterioration in FS at 6-months nor 12-months post-treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional outcomes following treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a single-centre comparison of microsurgical vs. endovascular management.\",\"authors\":\"Edward Goacher, Matthew I Sanders, Ridhi Surti, Mihai Danciut, Gueorgui Kounin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2025.2516028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal management of unruptured, middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, remains undetermined between microsurgical clipping and endovascular intervention. This study aims to compare post-operative functional outcomes between microsurgically and endovascularly treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All cases of unruptured MCA aneurysms undergoing treatment during a 10-year time period were identified and included. Functional status (FS) was measured using the Modified Rankin Scale. FS was assessed pre-treatment and at 1-month, 6-months and 12-months post-treatment. Median FS was compared between groups and relative risk ratios (RR) calculated to compare the risk of post-operative deterioration between the microsurgical and endovascular cohort at each time point. Occlusion and retreatment rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 119 cases of treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms were identified, of which 40 (34%) were managed microsurgically and 79 (66%) endovascularly. Mean age was 55 years (SD ± 11). No significant difference was seen in any demographic domain pre-operatively. 30-day survival in both cohorts was 100%. No significant difference in median FS was seen between the cohorts at any time point post-treatment. There was a significantly increased risk of deterioration in FS amongst the microsurgical cohort at 1-month post-treatment (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08 - 3.62, p = 0.03). There was no significant risk of deterioration in FS at either the 6-month nor 12-month time point post-treatment. Complete occlusion in the microsurgical cohort was greater than the endovascular cohort (91% vs. 66%), demonstrating a significantly reduced RR of incomplete occlusion (RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.77, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 1-month post-treatment, the risk of a decline in FS from baseline was almost twice as great in the microsurgical cohort. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of deterioration in FS at 6-months nor 12-months post-treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2516028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2516028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于未破裂的大脑中动脉(MCA)动脉瘤,显微手术夹闭和血管内介入治疗的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。本研究旨在比较显微手术和血管内治疗的未破裂MCA动脉瘤的术后功能结果。材料和方法:所有在10年期间接受治疗的未破裂的MCA动脉瘤病例被确定并纳入。功能状态(FS)采用改良Rankin量表测定。分别于治疗前、治疗后1个月、6个月、12个月评估FS。比较各组间中位FS,计算相对风险比(RR),比较各时间点显微手术组与血管内组术后恶化风险。并比较了闭塞率和再治疗率。结果:共发现119例经治疗的未破裂的中动脉动脉瘤,其中显微外科治疗40例(34%),血管内治疗79例(66%)。平均年龄55岁(SD±11)。术前各人口统计学指标无显著差异。两组患者的30天生存率均为100%。在治疗后的任何时间点,队列之间的中位FS均无显著差异。治疗后1个月,显微手术组FS恶化的风险显著增加(RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08 - 3.62, p = 0.03)。在治疗后6个月和12个月时间点,FS均无明显恶化风险。显微手术组的完全闭塞大于血管内组(91%比66%),表明完全闭塞的RR显著降低(RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.77, p = 0.02)。结论:在治疗后1个月,显微外科队列中FS从基线下降的风险几乎是两倍。然而,在治疗后6个月和12个月,FS恶化的风险没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional outcomes following treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a single-centre comparison of microsurgical vs. endovascular management.

Purpose: Optimal management of unruptured, middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, remains undetermined between microsurgical clipping and endovascular intervention. This study aims to compare post-operative functional outcomes between microsurgically and endovascularly treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms.

Materials and methods: All cases of unruptured MCA aneurysms undergoing treatment during a 10-year time period were identified and included. Functional status (FS) was measured using the Modified Rankin Scale. FS was assessed pre-treatment and at 1-month, 6-months and 12-months post-treatment. Median FS was compared between groups and relative risk ratios (RR) calculated to compare the risk of post-operative deterioration between the microsurgical and endovascular cohort at each time point. Occlusion and retreatment rates were also compared.

Results: In total, 119 cases of treated, unruptured MCA aneurysms were identified, of which 40 (34%) were managed microsurgically and 79 (66%) endovascularly. Mean age was 55 years (SD ± 11). No significant difference was seen in any demographic domain pre-operatively. 30-day survival in both cohorts was 100%. No significant difference in median FS was seen between the cohorts at any time point post-treatment. There was a significantly increased risk of deterioration in FS amongst the microsurgical cohort at 1-month post-treatment (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08 - 3.62, p = 0.03). There was no significant risk of deterioration in FS at either the 6-month nor 12-month time point post-treatment. Complete occlusion in the microsurgical cohort was greater than the endovascular cohort (91% vs. 66%), demonstrating a significantly reduced RR of incomplete occlusion (RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.77, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: At 1-month post-treatment, the risk of a decline in FS from baseline was almost twice as great in the microsurgical cohort. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of deterioration in FS at 6-months nor 12-months post-treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信