患者对通过肺癌筛查检测到的肺结节监测的经历和心理反应。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Evangelos Katsampouris, Andrew W Creamer, Ruth Prendecki, Elizabeth Clark, Jennifer L Dickson, Richard Lee, Samuel M Janes, Stephen W Duffy, Samantha L Quaife
{"title":"患者对通过肺癌筛查检测到的肺结节监测的经历和心理反应。","authors":"Evangelos Katsampouris, Andrew W Creamer, Ruth Prendecki, Elizabeth Clark, Jennifer L Dickson, Richard Lee, Samuel M Janes, Stephen W Duffy, Samantha L Quaife","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality among high-risk populations, and detects indeterminate pulmonary nodules that require subsequent surveillance. This period of uncertainty could result in patients experiencing lung cancer-related distress, anxiety and worry. This multicentre qualitative study explored patients' experiences and psychological responses to disclosing and communicating nodule surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were purposively sampled from four lung cancer screening sites in England to ensure diversity with respect to region, service setting, individual characteristics and surveillance pathways. Thirty-nine patients (23 females), aged 55-80 years, who had undergone their first nodule surveillance scan, participated in one-to-one remote semi-structured interviews. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using applied thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported a broad spectrum of psychological responses to the way their nodule finding was communicated and their experiences of undergoing surveillance. Understanding what a nodule is and what a surveillance process entails was important for explaining patient psychological reactions and behavioural outcomes. Perceived support and effective communication with healthcare professionals were instrumental in decreasing patients' distress, uncertainty and concern, and increasing reassurance, knowledge about nodules and psychological preparation for the possibility of surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While current letter-based means of nodule disclosure and communication were acceptable to patients, there is a need to improve the way nodules are communicated using lay language. Brief verbal consultations with healthcare professionals could provide clearer guidance to patients undergoing surveillance and increase their understanding about the surveillance process and subsequent scans, resulting in improved affective, behavioural and cognitive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' experiences of, and psychological responses to, surveillance for pulmonary nodules detected through lung cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Evangelos Katsampouris, Andrew W Creamer, Ruth Prendecki, Elizabeth Clark, Jennifer L Dickson, Richard Lee, Samuel M Janes, Stephen W Duffy, Samantha L Quaife\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality among high-risk populations, and detects indeterminate pulmonary nodules that require subsequent surveillance. This period of uncertainty could result in patients experiencing lung cancer-related distress, anxiety and worry. This multicentre qualitative study explored patients' experiences and psychological responses to disclosing and communicating nodule surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were purposively sampled from four lung cancer screening sites in England to ensure diversity with respect to region, service setting, individual characteristics and surveillance pathways. Thirty-nine patients (23 females), aged 55-80 years, who had undergone their first nodule surveillance scan, participated in one-to-one remote semi-structured interviews. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using applied thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported a broad spectrum of psychological responses to the way their nodule finding was communicated and their experiences of undergoing surveillance. Understanding what a nodule is and what a surveillance process entails was important for explaining patient psychological reactions and behavioural outcomes. Perceived support and effective communication with healthcare professionals were instrumental in decreasing patients' distress, uncertainty and concern, and increasing reassurance, knowledge about nodules and psychological preparation for the possibility of surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While current letter-based means of nodule disclosure and communication were acceptable to patients, there is a need to improve the way nodules are communicated using lay language. Brief verbal consultations with healthcare professionals could provide clearer guidance to patients undergoing surveillance and increase their understanding about the surveillance process and subsequent scans, resulting in improved affective, behavioural and cognitive outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002498\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低剂量CT筛查降低了高危人群的肺癌死亡率,并发现了需要后续监测的不确定肺结节。这段时间的不确定性可能导致患者经历与肺癌相关的痛苦、焦虑和担忧。本多中心定性研究探讨了患者对公开和交流结节监测的经历和心理反应。方法:有目的地从英格兰的四个肺癌筛查点取样符合条件的参与者,以确保地区、服务环境、个体特征和监测途径的多样性。39例患者(23例女性),年龄55 ~ 80岁,首次行结节监测扫描,参加一对一远程半结构化访谈。采访录音逐字抄录,并采用应用专题分析进行分析。结果:参与者报告了广泛的心理反应的方式,他们的结节发现的沟通和他们的经历进行监测。了解结节是什么以及监测过程需要什么,对于解释患者的心理反应和行为结果非常重要。感知到的支持和与卫生保健专业人员的有效沟通有助于减少患者的痛苦、不确定性和担忧,并增加对结节的保证、知识和对可能的监测的心理准备。结论:虽然目前以信件为基础的结节披露和交流方式对患者是可以接受的,但仍需要改进使用外行语言交流结节的方式。与医疗保健专业人员进行简短的口头咨询可以为接受监测的患者提供更清晰的指导,并增加他们对监测过程和随后的扫描的理解,从而改善情感、行为和认知结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' experiences of, and psychological responses to, surveillance for pulmonary nodules detected through lung cancer screening.

Introduction: Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality among high-risk populations, and detects indeterminate pulmonary nodules that require subsequent surveillance. This period of uncertainty could result in patients experiencing lung cancer-related distress, anxiety and worry. This multicentre qualitative study explored patients' experiences and psychological responses to disclosing and communicating nodule surveillance.

Methods: Eligible participants were purposively sampled from four lung cancer screening sites in England to ensure diversity with respect to region, service setting, individual characteristics and surveillance pathways. Thirty-nine patients (23 females), aged 55-80 years, who had undergone their first nodule surveillance scan, participated in one-to-one remote semi-structured interviews. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using applied thematic analysis.

Results: Participants reported a broad spectrum of psychological responses to the way their nodule finding was communicated and their experiences of undergoing surveillance. Understanding what a nodule is and what a surveillance process entails was important for explaining patient psychological reactions and behavioural outcomes. Perceived support and effective communication with healthcare professionals were instrumental in decreasing patients' distress, uncertainty and concern, and increasing reassurance, knowledge about nodules and psychological preparation for the possibility of surveillance.

Conclusions: While current letter-based means of nodule disclosure and communication were acceptable to patients, there is a need to improve the way nodules are communicated using lay language. Brief verbal consultations with healthcare professionals could provide clearer guidance to patients undergoing surveillance and increase their understanding about the surveillance process and subsequent scans, resulting in improved affective, behavioural and cognitive outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信