组织工程中的生物3D打印:当前最先进的技术和对系统标准化和临床翻译的挑战。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tarun Agarwal, Valentina Onesto, Dishary Banerjee, Shengbo Guo, Alessandro Polini, Caleb D Vogt, Abhishek Viswanath, Timothy Esworthy, Haitao Cui, Aaron O'Donnell, Kiran Yellappa Vajanthri, Lorenzo Moroni, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Lijie Grace Zhang, Marco Costantini, Tapas Kumar Maiti
{"title":"组织工程中的生物3D打印:当前最先进的技术和对系统标准化和临床翻译的挑战。","authors":"Tarun Agarwal, Valentina Onesto, Dishary Banerjee, Shengbo Guo, Alessandro Polini, Caleb D Vogt, Abhishek Viswanath, Timothy Esworthy, Haitao Cui, Aaron O'Donnell, Kiran Yellappa Vajanthri, Lorenzo Moroni, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Lijie Grace Zhang, Marco Costantini, Tapas Kumar Maiti","doi":"10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, 3D bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regarding in vitro culturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes.&#xD;This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A through discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas like bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with the discussions on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8964,"journal":{"name":"Biofabrication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation.\",\"authors\":\"Tarun Agarwal, Valentina Onesto, Dishary Banerjee, Shengbo Guo, Alessandro Polini, Caleb D Vogt, Abhishek Viswanath, Timothy Esworthy, Haitao Cui, Aaron O'Donnell, Kiran Yellappa Vajanthri, Lorenzo Moroni, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Lijie Grace Zhang, Marco Costantini, Tapas Kumar Maiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the past decade, 3D bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regarding in vitro culturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes.&#xD;This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A through discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas like bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with the discussions on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation.&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biofabrication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biofabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofabrication","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,3D生物打印取得了重大进展,成为组织工程领域的一项关键创新。尽管取得了早期的进展,但3D生物打印仍然面临着关键的挑战,必须解决这些挑战才能加速临床转化。特别是,在功能成熟、临床相关的组织当量被开发出来之前,还有很长的路要走。目前的限制包括从次优的生物连接特性和生物可打印结构的仿生学程度,到缺乏用于大量细胞扩增的干细胞/祖细胞,以及关于体外培养条件的基本知识。除了这些问题之外,缺乏指导方针和规范良好的国际标准也给生物制造界的利益相关者带来了关于可靠和可扩展的生产过程的不确定性。本综述旨在探讨生物3D打印方法的最新发展,包括各种增材制造技术及其应用。通过对常见生物打印技术和最新进展的讨论,以及最近值得注意的研究。随后,我们讨论了目前3D生物打印在临床应用中的挑战,以及3D生物打印组织等效物商业化的主要瓶颈,包括生物打印器官的寿命,满足生物力学要求,以及经常被低估的伦理和法律方面。在再生医学监管工作的进展中,我们也概述了当前的监管问题,这些问题应该被考虑到将生物打印组织转化为临床实践。最后,对生物3D打印的未来发展方向进行了展望,包括微重力环境下的生物打印和人工智能的融合等。该研究最后讨论了在解决技术和监管限制方面合作的必要性,以提高生物打印组织等效物的质量、可靠性和可重复性,最终实现其成功的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation.

Over the past decade, 3D bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regarding in vitro culturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes. This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A through discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas like bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with the discussions on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biofabrication
Biofabrication ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
118
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Biofabrication is dedicated to advancing cutting-edge research on the utilization of cells, proteins, biological materials, and biomaterials as fundamental components for the construction of biological systems and/or therapeutic products. Additionally, it proudly serves as the official journal of the International Society for Biofabrication (ISBF).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信