主动学习技巧能提高研究生在线解剖学课程的学习成绩吗?

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
L J Bradley, K E Meyer, M S Kerr, S D Maddux, A J Heck, R E Reeves, E K Handler
{"title":"主动学习技巧能提高研究生在线解剖学课程的学习成绩吗?","authors":"L J Bradley, K E Meyer, M S Kerr, S D Maddux, A J Heck, R E Reeves, E K Handler","doi":"10.1002/ase.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do active learning techniques promote higher academic performance in an online graduate anatomy course?\",\"authors\":\"L J Bradley, K E Meyer, M S Kerr, S D Maddux, A J Heck, R E Reeves, E K Handler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体解剖学是研究生健康专业课程的一门基础课程。鉴于解剖学课程的注册人数不断增加,随着新技术的发展,机构越来越多地被迫提供其他课程形式,包括在线学习。同样,高等教育正日益从传统的以讲座为基础的学习向允许学生积极参与自己的学习过程(即主动学习)的方法过渡。主动学习有很多好处,包括提高学习成绩。很少有研究调查主动学习技巧对学生在研究生解剖学在线课程学习成绩的影响。本研究探讨参与四种主动学习技巧(拼图、团队学习模块、概念映射和问题建构)后学生考试成绩的差异。具体地说,本研究调查了在每个单元的主动学习活动中,分配给学生的学习目标与非分配的学习目标之间的学习成绩是否存在差异。170名学生完成了在线解剖学课程。结果显示,参与主动学习的学生(无论使用何种方法)与对照组的学习成绩一般没有显著差异。然而,参与主动学习的学生被发现在与他们被要求教授的目标相关的考试问题上表现得比他们从同龄人那里学到的目标要好得多。本研究的结果表明,主动学习对学习成绩的好处主要归功于同伴教学所需的准备过程,因为接受者同伴学习者似乎从主动学习中获得的好处最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do active learning techniques promote higher academic performance in an online graduate anatomy course?

Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信