冻损叶片比例:一种简单可靠的小麦冻损评估方法

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Lei Li, Bohua Li, Yongle Yang, Jinlong Bian, Zhengxi Sun, Panpan Huang, Tao Li
{"title":"冻损叶片比例:一种简单可靠的小麦冻损评估方法","authors":"Lei Li,&nbsp;Bohua Li,&nbsp;Yongle Yang,&nbsp;Jinlong Bian,&nbsp;Zhengxi Sun,&nbsp;Panpan Huang,&nbsp;Tao Li","doi":"10.1111/jac.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Frost resistance is a crucial trait in wheat breeding, and accurately assessing the phenotype of frost damage is vital for the genetic improvement of wheat resistance to frost damage. However, the unpredictability of cold wave events and regional variations in frost damage levels complicate the precise evaluation of frost damage. Survival rate and frost damage grade (on a scale of 1 to 5) are commonly used indicators for evaluating frost damage. However, these methods are mainly effective in extreme low-temperature conditions that cause significant wheat mortality or result in severe frost damage ratings above 3. They are not well-suited for the more subtle phenotypic variations associated with common low temperatures, such as those ranging from −10°C to −5°C. In this study, we employed four different phenotyping methods to evaluate the severity of frost damage in a panel of 50 wheat recombinant inbred lines in two distinct environments, and proposed a novel approach to quantify frost damage based on the proportion of frost-damaged leaves (PFD), which proves to be simple and robust for assessing the severity of frost damage in wheat across multiple biological replicates and a spectrum of environmental conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Proportion of Frost-Damaged Leaves: A Simple and Robust Approach for Evaluating Frost Damage in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)\",\"authors\":\"Lei Li,&nbsp;Bohua Li,&nbsp;Yongle Yang,&nbsp;Jinlong Bian,&nbsp;Zhengxi Sun,&nbsp;Panpan Huang,&nbsp;Tao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jac.70089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Frost resistance is a crucial trait in wheat breeding, and accurately assessing the phenotype of frost damage is vital for the genetic improvement of wheat resistance to frost damage. However, the unpredictability of cold wave events and regional variations in frost damage levels complicate the precise evaluation of frost damage. Survival rate and frost damage grade (on a scale of 1 to 5) are commonly used indicators for evaluating frost damage. However, these methods are mainly effective in extreme low-temperature conditions that cause significant wheat mortality or result in severe frost damage ratings above 3. They are not well-suited for the more subtle phenotypic variations associated with common low temperatures, such as those ranging from −10°C to −5°C. In this study, we employed four different phenotyping methods to evaluate the severity of frost damage in a panel of 50 wheat recombinant inbred lines in two distinct environments, and proposed a novel approach to quantify frost damage based on the proportion of frost-damaged leaves (PFD), which proves to be simple and robust for assessing the severity of frost damage in wheat across multiple biological replicates and a spectrum of environmental conditions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"211 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗冻性是小麦育种中的一项重要性状,准确评估抗冻表型对小麦抗冻性的遗传改良至关重要。然而,寒潮事件的不可预测性和霜冻灾害程度的区域差异使霜冻灾害的精确评估复杂化。存活率和霜冻损害等级(1到5级)是评估霜冻损害的常用指标。然而,这些方法主要在极端低温条件下有效,这些条件会导致小麦大量死亡或导致严重的霜害等级高于3。它们不太适合与普通低温相关的更微妙的表型变化,例如从- 10°C到- 5°C。在本研究中,我们采用四种不同的表型方法对50个小麦重组自交系在两种不同环境下的霜冻危害程度进行了评估,并提出了一种基于霜冻损害叶片比例(PFD)的量化霜冻危害的新方法,该方法证明了在多个生物重复和一系列环境条件下评估小麦霜冻危害程度的简单而可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Proportion of Frost-Damaged Leaves: A Simple and Robust Approach for Evaluating Frost Damage in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Frost resistance is a crucial trait in wheat breeding, and accurately assessing the phenotype of frost damage is vital for the genetic improvement of wheat resistance to frost damage. However, the unpredictability of cold wave events and regional variations in frost damage levels complicate the precise evaluation of frost damage. Survival rate and frost damage grade (on a scale of 1 to 5) are commonly used indicators for evaluating frost damage. However, these methods are mainly effective in extreme low-temperature conditions that cause significant wheat mortality or result in severe frost damage ratings above 3. They are not well-suited for the more subtle phenotypic variations associated with common low temperatures, such as those ranging from −10°C to −5°C. In this study, we employed four different phenotyping methods to evaluate the severity of frost damage in a panel of 50 wheat recombinant inbred lines in two distinct environments, and proposed a novel approach to quantify frost damage based on the proportion of frost-damaged leaves (PFD), which proves to be simple and robust for assessing the severity of frost damage in wheat across multiple biological replicates and a spectrum of environmental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信