水热液化与快速/闪热热解生物质转化为生物燃料:液体生物燃料产量、组成和性质的新见解和比较综述

IF 9.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1039/D5GC01314C
Farid Alizad Oghyanous and Cigdem Eskicioglu
{"title":"水热液化与快速/闪热热解生物质转化为生物燃料:液体生物燃料产量、组成和性质的新见解和比较综述","authors":"Farid Alizad Oghyanous and Cigdem Eskicioglu","doi":"10.1039/D5GC01314C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and fast/flash pyrolysis are thermochemical processes (TPs) with proven potential to convert biomass into liquid biofuel, which can be comparable to crude oil. HTL is generally preferred for wet biomass, while fast/flash pyrolysis is more suitable for dried biomass, as moisture content plays a crucial role in determining the appropriate conversion method. Beyond moisture content, the biochemical and elemental composition of biomass significantly impacts the physical and chemical characteristics of the resulting liquid biofuels, often increasing the need for upgrading. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis for converting five biomass types—lignocellulosic biomass, microalgae, macroalgae, municipal sludge, and food waste—into liquid biofuels, highlighting the impact of biomass composition on biofuel yield and quality. By linking biomass type, process severity, and liquid biofuel quantity, this study offers a structured framework for selecting the optimal conversion process and severity range to maximize biofuel yield in large-scale applications. Additionally, this review identifies various organic compounds and their concentrations in liquid biofuels produced through HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis from different biomass sources, serving as a valuable resource for developing novel multistage and selective upgrading processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 24","pages":" 7009-7041"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/gc/d5gc01314c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrothermal liquefaction vs. fast/flash pyrolysis for biomass-to-biofuel conversion: new insights and comparative review of liquid biofuel yield, composition, and properties†\",\"authors\":\"Farid Alizad Oghyanous and Cigdem Eskicioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5GC01314C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and fast/flash pyrolysis are thermochemical processes (TPs) with proven potential to convert biomass into liquid biofuel, which can be comparable to crude oil. HTL is generally preferred for wet biomass, while fast/flash pyrolysis is more suitable for dried biomass, as moisture content plays a crucial role in determining the appropriate conversion method. Beyond moisture content, the biochemical and elemental composition of biomass significantly impacts the physical and chemical characteristics of the resulting liquid biofuels, often increasing the need for upgrading. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis for converting five biomass types—lignocellulosic biomass, microalgae, macroalgae, municipal sludge, and food waste—into liquid biofuels, highlighting the impact of biomass composition on biofuel yield and quality. By linking biomass type, process severity, and liquid biofuel quantity, this study offers a structured framework for selecting the optimal conversion process and severity range to maximize biofuel yield in large-scale applications. Additionally, this review identifies various organic compounds and their concentrations in liquid biofuels produced through HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis from different biomass sources, serving as a valuable resource for developing novel multistage and selective upgrading processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" 24\",\"pages\":\" 7009-7041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/gc/d5gc01314c?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc01314c\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc01314c","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热液液化(HTL)和快速/闪蒸热解是热化学过程(TPs),具有将生物质转化为液体生物燃料的潜力,可以与原油相媲美。湿生物质通常首选HTL,而干燥生物质更适合快速/闪蒸热解,因为水分含量在决定合适的转化方法方面起着至关重要的作用。除了水分含量之外,生物质的生化和元素组成显著影响所产生的液体生物燃料的物理和化学特性,往往增加了升级的需要。本文综述了HTL和快速/闪速热解将五种生物质类型(木质纤维素生物质、微藻、大藻、城市污泥和食物垃圾)转化为液体生物燃料的全面比较,重点介绍了生物质组成对生物燃料产量和质量的影响。通过将生物质类型、过程严重程度和液体生物燃料数量联系起来,本研究为选择最佳转化过程和严重程度范围提供了一个结构化框架,以最大限度地提高大规模应用中的生物燃料产量。此外,本综述确定了通过HTL和快速/闪蒸热解从不同生物质来源生产的液体生物燃料中的各种有机化合物及其浓度,为开发新的多阶段和选择性升级工艺提供了宝贵的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrothermal liquefaction vs. fast/flash pyrolysis for biomass-to-biofuel conversion: new insights and comparative review of liquid biofuel yield, composition, and properties†

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and fast/flash pyrolysis are thermochemical processes (TPs) with proven potential to convert biomass into liquid biofuel, which can be comparable to crude oil. HTL is generally preferred for wet biomass, while fast/flash pyrolysis is more suitable for dried biomass, as moisture content plays a crucial role in determining the appropriate conversion method. Beyond moisture content, the biochemical and elemental composition of biomass significantly impacts the physical and chemical characteristics of the resulting liquid biofuels, often increasing the need for upgrading. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis for converting five biomass types—lignocellulosic biomass, microalgae, macroalgae, municipal sludge, and food waste—into liquid biofuels, highlighting the impact of biomass composition on biofuel yield and quality. By linking biomass type, process severity, and liquid biofuel quantity, this study offers a structured framework for selecting the optimal conversion process and severity range to maximize biofuel yield in large-scale applications. Additionally, this review identifies various organic compounds and their concentrations in liquid biofuels produced through HTL and fast/flash pyrolysis from different biomass sources, serving as a valuable resource for developing novel multistage and selective upgrading processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信