{"title":"自闭症和分裂型特质维度如何影响神经预测加工:事件相关电位研究","authors":"Prune Mazer , Rita Pasion , Melissa Fontes , Cristiana Pires , Celeste Silveira , Fernando Ferreira-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Predictive Processing framework offers insights into the neural mechanisms underlying autism and schizophrenia spectra. This study employed visual and auditory oddball tasks with varying difficulty levels to test whether brain-responses to unexpected events are different within these spectra. A total of 122 participants underwent EEG recordings and completed self-reports of autistic and schizotypal traits. Results showed that increased task difficulty significantly reduced P300 amplitudes across both sensory modalities. Higher Restricted Interests and Detail Orientation autistic traits were associated with enhanced N2 amplitudes in the difficult visual task, but there were no effects in the P300 time-window. Bayesian analyses yielded moderate evidence against any reliable association between P300 amplitudes and both autistic traits and schizotypy. Early auditory N1-P2 showed no credible relationships with schizotypal traits and only weak, task–dependent associations with autistic communication difficulties. Our study contributes to the growing literature on neural variability in autism and schizophrenia, emphasizing the importance of symptom-specific research and paving the way for more targeted investigations on predictive processing mechanisms. Moreover, the divergent findings for communication versus restricted-interests traits strengthen proposals that social and non-social dimensions in autism rely on distinct neural processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"188 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How distinct autism and schizotypal trait dimensions influence neural predictive processing: An Event-related potential study\",\"authors\":\"Prune Mazer , Rita Pasion , Melissa Fontes , Cristiana Pires , Celeste Silveira , Fernando Ferreira-Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Predictive Processing framework offers insights into the neural mechanisms underlying autism and schizophrenia spectra. This study employed visual and auditory oddball tasks with varying difficulty levels to test whether brain-responses to unexpected events are different within these spectra. A total of 122 participants underwent EEG recordings and completed self-reports of autistic and schizotypal traits. Results showed that increased task difficulty significantly reduced P300 amplitudes across both sensory modalities. Higher Restricted Interests and Detail Orientation autistic traits were associated with enhanced N2 amplitudes in the difficult visual task, but there were no effects in the P300 time-window. Bayesian analyses yielded moderate evidence against any reliable association between P300 amplitudes and both autistic traits and schizotypy. Early auditory N1-P2 showed no credible relationships with schizotypal traits and only weak, task–dependent associations with autistic communication difficulties. Our study contributes to the growing literature on neural variability in autism and schizophrenia, emphasizing the importance of symptom-specific research and paving the way for more targeted investigations on predictive processing mechanisms. Moreover, the divergent findings for communication versus restricted-interests traits strengthen proposals that social and non-social dimensions in autism rely on distinct neural processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262625000697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262625000697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How distinct autism and schizotypal trait dimensions influence neural predictive processing: An Event-related potential study
The Predictive Processing framework offers insights into the neural mechanisms underlying autism and schizophrenia spectra. This study employed visual and auditory oddball tasks with varying difficulty levels to test whether brain-responses to unexpected events are different within these spectra. A total of 122 participants underwent EEG recordings and completed self-reports of autistic and schizotypal traits. Results showed that increased task difficulty significantly reduced P300 amplitudes across both sensory modalities. Higher Restricted Interests and Detail Orientation autistic traits were associated with enhanced N2 amplitudes in the difficult visual task, but there were no effects in the P300 time-window. Bayesian analyses yielded moderate evidence against any reliable association between P300 amplitudes and both autistic traits and schizotypy. Early auditory N1-P2 showed no credible relationships with schizotypal traits and only weak, task–dependent associations with autistic communication difficulties. Our study contributes to the growing literature on neural variability in autism and schizophrenia, emphasizing the importance of symptom-specific research and paving the way for more targeted investigations on predictive processing mechanisms. Moreover, the divergent findings for communication versus restricted-interests traits strengthen proposals that social and non-social dimensions in autism rely on distinct neural processes.
期刊介绍:
Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.