{"title":"放大伽利略系统和工作姿势在牙科学生:交叉研究","authors":"Júlia M. Pazos , Jessica K.A. Silva , Patrícia P.N.S. Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the effects of different magnifications of the Galilean system on the posture of dental students during pre-clinical procedures. Thirty-seven second-year undergraduate dental students participated in this study. Dependent variables included angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck, neck muscle activity, and working distance from the operator's eyes to the mannequin's mouth. The independent variable was the magnification of the Galilean system loupes at four levels (naked eye, 2.5×, 3.0 × , and 3.5× magnification). Students performed Class I teeth preparations on the maxillary first molar using a dental mannequin, and postures were recorded on photographs during the procedure. The “Software for Postural Assessment” (version 0.69) analyzed the angular deviation and working distance. Muscle activity was assessed bilaterally using surface electromyography of the descending trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Descriptive statistical analysis and one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was conducted (α = 0.050). As a result, a greater angular deviation of the neck was observed with the naked eye during tooth preparation (p < 0.001). However, different magnifications did not affect the muscle activity (p = 0.050–0.911) or working distance (p = 0.136). It was possible to conclude that, regardless of the magnification, using Galilean loupes reduced angular deviation; however, it did not influence muscle activity or working distance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnification of the Galilean system and work posture in dental students: a crossover study\",\"authors\":\"Júlia M. Pazos , Jessica K.A. Silva , Patrícia P.N.S. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated the effects of different magnifications of the Galilean system on the posture of dental students during pre-clinical procedures. Thirty-seven second-year undergraduate dental students participated in this study. Dependent variables included angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck, neck muscle activity, and working distance from the operator's eyes to the mannequin's mouth. The independent variable was the magnification of the Galilean system loupes at four levels (naked eye, 2.5×, 3.0 × , and 3.5× magnification). Students performed Class I teeth preparations on the maxillary first molar using a dental mannequin, and postures were recorded on photographs during the procedure. The “Software for Postural Assessment” (version 0.69) analyzed the angular deviation and working distance. Muscle activity was assessed bilaterally using surface electromyography of the descending trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Descriptive statistical analysis and one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was conducted (α = 0.050). As a result, a greater angular deviation of the neck was observed with the naked eye during tooth preparation (p < 0.001). However, different magnifications did not affect the muscle activity (p = 0.050–0.911) or working distance (p = 0.136). It was possible to conclude that, regardless of the magnification, using Galilean loupes reduced angular deviation; however, it did not influence muscle activity or working distance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Magnification of the Galilean system and work posture in dental students: a crossover study
This study investigated the effects of different magnifications of the Galilean system on the posture of dental students during pre-clinical procedures. Thirty-seven second-year undergraduate dental students participated in this study. Dependent variables included angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck, neck muscle activity, and working distance from the operator's eyes to the mannequin's mouth. The independent variable was the magnification of the Galilean system loupes at four levels (naked eye, 2.5×, 3.0 × , and 3.5× magnification). Students performed Class I teeth preparations on the maxillary first molar using a dental mannequin, and postures were recorded on photographs during the procedure. The “Software for Postural Assessment” (version 0.69) analyzed the angular deviation and working distance. Muscle activity was assessed bilaterally using surface electromyography of the descending trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Descriptive statistical analysis and one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was conducted (α = 0.050). As a result, a greater angular deviation of the neck was observed with the naked eye during tooth preparation (p < 0.001). However, different magnifications did not affect the muscle activity (p = 0.050–0.911) or working distance (p = 0.136). It was possible to conclude that, regardless of the magnification, using Galilean loupes reduced angular deviation; however, it did not influence muscle activity or working distance.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.