{"title":"自然相关性对碳标签类型选择和支付碳溢价意愿的影响","authors":"Yu Yao, Xiaoxiao He, Zhenhua Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Currently, carbon emissions are the primary driver of the global greenhouse gas effect, closely linked to daily consumption activities. Low-carbon consumption has emerged as a critical component of the low-carbon economy. Carbon labels were introduced to guide consumers toward more sustainable choices. By enhancing access to environmental-friendly information, carbon labeling mitigates the asymmetry of carbon-related information between consumers and manufacturers. Additionally, as a guiding social norm, it contributes to fostering a culture of low-carbon consumption. This study analyzes the impact of carbon labels on consumers’ low-carbon purchasing decisions by categorizing them into numerical and non-numerical types. Utilizing an incremental dual-pronged experimental design, we explore the interplay among consumers’ nature relatedness, the perceived value of carbon labels, trust levels in these labels, preferences for label types, and the willingness to pay a premium for carbon-labeled products. The experimental results indicate that consumers’ environmental attitudes - nature relatedness, significantly influence their willingness to purchase low-carbon products, higher levels of nature relatedness are positively associated with an increased likelihood of selecting carbon-labeled products, especially those featuring numerical carbon labels. Furthermore, the perceived value of carbon labels and the degree of trust in these labels serve as dual mediators between nature relatedness and the willingness to choose and pay a premium for carbon-labeled goods. Interestingly, consumers demonstrate a higher willingness to pay a premium for non-numerical carbon labels compared to numerical ones. These findings offer valuable insights for Chinese enterprises looking to implement marketing strategies based on carbon labeling as they navigate the early stages of the low-carbon economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of nature relatedness on carbon labeling type selection and willingness to pay a carbon premium\",\"authors\":\"Yu Yao, Xiaoxiao He, Zhenhua Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Currently, carbon emissions are the primary driver of the global greenhouse gas effect, closely linked to daily consumption activities. Low-carbon consumption has emerged as a critical component of the low-carbon economy. Carbon labels were introduced to guide consumers toward more sustainable choices. By enhancing access to environmental-friendly information, carbon labeling mitigates the asymmetry of carbon-related information between consumers and manufacturers. Additionally, as a guiding social norm, it contributes to fostering a culture of low-carbon consumption. This study analyzes the impact of carbon labels on consumers’ low-carbon purchasing decisions by categorizing them into numerical and non-numerical types. Utilizing an incremental dual-pronged experimental design, we explore the interplay among consumers’ nature relatedness, the perceived value of carbon labels, trust levels in these labels, preferences for label types, and the willingness to pay a premium for carbon-labeled products. The experimental results indicate that consumers’ environmental attitudes - nature relatedness, significantly influence their willingness to purchase low-carbon products, higher levels of nature relatedness are positively associated with an increased likelihood of selecting carbon-labeled products, especially those featuring numerical carbon labels. Furthermore, the perceived value of carbon labels and the degree of trust in these labels serve as dual mediators between nature relatedness and the willingness to choose and pay a premium for carbon-labeled goods. Interestingly, consumers demonstrate a higher willingness to pay a premium for non-numerical carbon labels compared to numerical ones. These findings offer valuable insights for Chinese enterprises looking to implement marketing strategies based on carbon labeling as they navigate the early stages of the low-carbon economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825003557\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825003557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of nature relatedness on carbon labeling type selection and willingness to pay a carbon premium
Currently, carbon emissions are the primary driver of the global greenhouse gas effect, closely linked to daily consumption activities. Low-carbon consumption has emerged as a critical component of the low-carbon economy. Carbon labels were introduced to guide consumers toward more sustainable choices. By enhancing access to environmental-friendly information, carbon labeling mitigates the asymmetry of carbon-related information between consumers and manufacturers. Additionally, as a guiding social norm, it contributes to fostering a culture of low-carbon consumption. This study analyzes the impact of carbon labels on consumers’ low-carbon purchasing decisions by categorizing them into numerical and non-numerical types. Utilizing an incremental dual-pronged experimental design, we explore the interplay among consumers’ nature relatedness, the perceived value of carbon labels, trust levels in these labels, preferences for label types, and the willingness to pay a premium for carbon-labeled products. The experimental results indicate that consumers’ environmental attitudes - nature relatedness, significantly influence their willingness to purchase low-carbon products, higher levels of nature relatedness are positively associated with an increased likelihood of selecting carbon-labeled products, especially those featuring numerical carbon labels. Furthermore, the perceived value of carbon labels and the degree of trust in these labels serve as dual mediators between nature relatedness and the willingness to choose and pay a premium for carbon-labeled goods. Interestingly, consumers demonstrate a higher willingness to pay a premium for non-numerical carbon labels compared to numerical ones. These findings offer valuable insights for Chinese enterprises looking to implement marketing strategies based on carbon labeling as they navigate the early stages of the low-carbon economy.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.