{"title":"探讨人工智能和大数据对可持续创业的经济、环境和社会影响","authors":"Nathanael Ojong","doi":"10.1002/bse.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence and big data are increasingly being integrated into sustainable entrepreneurship practices. Yet, conventional literature often neglects to critically examine their economic, environmental, and social implications. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand when, how, and for whom artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship generate value. Our findings suggest that the three dimensions of sustainability—economic, environmental, and social—should be examined through a tri‐level impact prism: the immediate efficiency or transparency gains firms report; the hidden or temporally deferred costs that accumulate; and—notably—the distributional consequences that determine who reaps the benefits and who inherits the burdens. Direct benefits can evolve into costs over time and, if neglected, may reinforce injustices that rebound and erode future gains. Whether the broader trajectory settles on the virtuous or vicious side of that loop depends on five boundary conditions: organizational capabilities, technological maturity, socio‐cultural values, sectoral and regulatory context, and temporal dynamics. Our study advances theory by extending the triple‐bottom‐line lens into a reflexive impact‐by‐cost framework—one that foregrounds rebound effects and justice considerations, injects power, path dependency, and distributional conflict into socio‐technical transition debates, and recasts contingency and dynamic capabilities theories around shifting cost and justice configurations.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogating the Economic, Environmental, and Social Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship\",\"authors\":\"Nathanael Ojong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence and big data are increasingly being integrated into sustainable entrepreneurship practices. Yet, conventional literature often neglects to critically examine their economic, environmental, and social implications. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand when, how, and for whom artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship generate value. Our findings suggest that the three dimensions of sustainability—economic, environmental, and social—should be examined through a tri‐level impact prism: the immediate efficiency or transparency gains firms report; the hidden or temporally deferred costs that accumulate; and—notably—the distributional consequences that determine who reaps the benefits and who inherits the burdens. Direct benefits can evolve into costs over time and, if neglected, may reinforce injustices that rebound and erode future gains. Whether the broader trajectory settles on the virtuous or vicious side of that loop depends on five boundary conditions: organizational capabilities, technological maturity, socio‐cultural values, sectoral and regulatory context, and temporal dynamics. Our study advances theory by extending the triple‐bottom‐line lens into a reflexive impact‐by‐cost framework—one that foregrounds rebound effects and justice considerations, injects power, path dependency, and distributional conflict into socio‐technical transition debates, and recasts contingency and dynamic capabilities theories around shifting cost and justice configurations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interrogating the Economic, Environmental, and Social Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship
Artificial intelligence and big data are increasingly being integrated into sustainable entrepreneurship practices. Yet, conventional literature often neglects to critically examine their economic, environmental, and social implications. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand when, how, and for whom artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship generate value. Our findings suggest that the three dimensions of sustainability—economic, environmental, and social—should be examined through a tri‐level impact prism: the immediate efficiency or transparency gains firms report; the hidden or temporally deferred costs that accumulate; and—notably—the distributional consequences that determine who reaps the benefits and who inherits the burdens. Direct benefits can evolve into costs over time and, if neglected, may reinforce injustices that rebound and erode future gains. Whether the broader trajectory settles on the virtuous or vicious side of that loop depends on five boundary conditions: organizational capabilities, technological maturity, socio‐cultural values, sectoral and regulatory context, and temporal dynamics. Our study advances theory by extending the triple‐bottom‐line lens into a reflexive impact‐by‐cost framework—one that foregrounds rebound effects and justice considerations, injects power, path dependency, and distributional conflict into socio‐technical transition debates, and recasts contingency and dynamic capabilities theories around shifting cost and justice configurations.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.