6项运动控制测试评估腰椎运动控制障碍的有效性。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325996
Peemongkon Wattananon, Aminu Alhassan Ibrahim, Sasithorn Kongoun, Katayan Klahan
{"title":"6项运动控制测试评估腰椎运动控制障碍的有效性。","authors":"Peemongkon Wattananon, Aminu Alhassan Ibrahim, Sasithorn Kongoun, Katayan Klahan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) demonstrate movement control impairment (MCI) based on a 6-item motor control test (MCT) battery, suggesting its potential clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the criterion-related validity of the 6-item MCT battery in discriminating MCI among individuals with CNLBP, a history of low back pain (HxLBP), and no low back pain (NoLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred forty-one participants aged 20-40 years (47 participants per group) were recruited. The MCT battery (the waiter's bow, pelvic tilt, sitting knee extension, quadruped rocking forward, quadruped rocking backward, prone knee flexion) was rated using different rating methods, including individual tests, summation, and direction-specific tests. A 2x2 contingency table using a known group against the rating result was used to calculate chi-square, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each pair separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chi-square tests demonstrated significant associations (P < 0.05) between MCT and CNLBP when compared against NoLBP. In addition, the waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests demonstrated high sensitivity (81% and 72%, respectively), while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation demonstrated high specificity (70%, 70%, and 89%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest the acceptable validity of the MCT battery when compared between CNLBP and NoLBP. The waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests effectively ruled out individuals with NoLBP with negative results, while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation effectively ruled in the individuals with CNLBP with positive results. These findings highlight the clinical utility of these tests in assessing MCI in the lumbar spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.\",\"authors\":\"Peemongkon Wattananon, Aminu Alhassan Ibrahim, Sasithorn Kongoun, Katayan Klahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) demonstrate movement control impairment (MCI) based on a 6-item motor control test (MCT) battery, suggesting its potential clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the criterion-related validity of the 6-item MCT battery in discriminating MCI among individuals with CNLBP, a history of low back pain (HxLBP), and no low back pain (NoLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred forty-one participants aged 20-40 years (47 participants per group) were recruited. The MCT battery (the waiter's bow, pelvic tilt, sitting knee extension, quadruped rocking forward, quadruped rocking backward, prone knee flexion) was rated using different rating methods, including individual tests, summation, and direction-specific tests. A 2x2 contingency table using a known group against the rating result was used to calculate chi-square, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each pair separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chi-square tests demonstrated significant associations (P < 0.05) between MCT and CNLBP when compared against NoLBP. In addition, the waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests demonstrated high sensitivity (81% and 72%, respectively), while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation demonstrated high specificity (70%, 70%, and 89%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest the acceptable validity of the MCT battery when compared between CNLBP and NoLBP. The waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests effectively ruled out individuals with NoLBP with negative results, while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation effectively ruled in the individuals with CNLBP with positive results. These findings highlight the clinical utility of these tests in assessing MCI in the lumbar spine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0325996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性非特异性腰痛(CNLBP)患者表现出基于6项运动控制测试(MCT)的运动控制障碍(MCI),提示其潜在的临床应用价值。目的:本研究旨在确定6项MCT量表在有CNLBP、有腰痛史(HxLBP)和无腰痛(NoLBP)的个体中区分MCI的标准相关效度。方法:招募年龄在20 ~ 40岁之间的141名受试者(每组47名)。MCT组(服务员鞠躬、骨盆倾斜、坐姿膝盖伸展、四足向前摇晃、四足向后摇晃、俯卧膝盖弯曲)采用不同的评分方法进行评分,包括个体测试、汇总测试和方向特定测试。使用已知组对评分结果的2x2列联表分别计算每对的卡方、敏感性、特异性和阳性和阴性似然比。结果:卡方检验显示了显著的相关性(P)结论:研究结果表明,在CNLBP和NoLBP之间比较,MCT电池的有效性是可以接受的。服务员弓和屈曲特异性测试有效地排除了阴性结果的NoLBP患者,而坐姿膝关节伸展、俯卧膝关节屈曲和总结有效地排除了阳性结果的CNLBP患者。这些发现强调了这些试验在评估腰椎MCI中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.

Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.

Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.

Validity of a 6-item movement control test battery for evaluation of movement control impairment in the lumbar spine.

Background: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) demonstrate movement control impairment (MCI) based on a 6-item motor control test (MCT) battery, suggesting its potential clinical utility.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the criterion-related validity of the 6-item MCT battery in discriminating MCI among individuals with CNLBP, a history of low back pain (HxLBP), and no low back pain (NoLBP).

Methods: One hundred forty-one participants aged 20-40 years (47 participants per group) were recruited. The MCT battery (the waiter's bow, pelvic tilt, sitting knee extension, quadruped rocking forward, quadruped rocking backward, prone knee flexion) was rated using different rating methods, including individual tests, summation, and direction-specific tests. A 2x2 contingency table using a known group against the rating result was used to calculate chi-square, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each pair separately.

Results: Chi-square tests demonstrated significant associations (P < 0.05) between MCT and CNLBP when compared against NoLBP. In addition, the waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests demonstrated high sensitivity (81% and 72%, respectively), while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation demonstrated high specificity (70%, 70%, and 89%, respectively).

Conclusion: Findings suggest the acceptable validity of the MCT battery when compared between CNLBP and NoLBP. The waiter's bow and flexion-specific tests effectively ruled out individuals with NoLBP with negative results, while sitting knee extension, prone knee flexion, and summation effectively ruled in the individuals with CNLBP with positive results. These findings highlight the clinical utility of these tests in assessing MCI in the lumbar spine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信