使用ChatGPT和GPT-4分析专业医疗机构政策声明的政治观点:横断面研究。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ben Knudsen, Amr Madkour, Preetam Cholli, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad
{"title":"使用ChatGPT和GPT-4分析专业医疗机构政策声明的政治观点:横断面研究。","authors":"Ben Knudsen, Amr Madkour, Preetam Cholli, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad","doi":"10.2196/66204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional medical organizations publish policy statements that are used to impact legislation or address societal issues. Many organizations are nonpartisan, yet it is uncertain whether their policy statements balance liberal and conservative values.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the political viewpoint of policy statements from 6 influential medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Psychiatric Association, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, and American Academy of Family Physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2023 and February 2024, policy statements from the 6 organizations were identified and evaluated using ChatGPT with GPT-4 to reduce bias. Each statement was pasted into a new ChatGPT session following the phrase \"Does this text align with a liberal or conservative viewpoint?\" Two authors reviewed each response and categorized the statement as liberal, probably liberal, neutral, probably conservative, or conservative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of policy statements (529/1592, 33.2%) were found to be aligned with a political ideology. Among these 529 statements, 516 (97.5%) were liberal or probably liberal and 13 (2.5%) were conservative or probably conservative. For each organization, among policy statements with a political leaning, the percentage of liberal or probably liberal statements was as follows: 100% (69/69) for the American Academy of Pediatrics, 100% (24/24) for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 100% (12/12) for the American College of Surgeons, 99% (72/73) for the American Psychiatric Association, 97% (174/180) for the American Academy of Family Physicians, and 96% (165/171) for the American College of Physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in 3 policy statements from these 6 professional organizations align with a partisan political viewpoint. Among these, positions are 40 times more likely to be liberal or probably liberal than conservative or probably conservative. Whether or not organizations are politically neutral and seek viewpoint diversity warrants further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e66204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Political Viewpoint of Policy Statements From Professional Medical Organizations Using ChatGPT With GPT-4: Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Knudsen, Amr Madkour, Preetam Cholli, Alyson Haslam, Vinay Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/66204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional medical organizations publish policy statements that are used to impact legislation or address societal issues. Many organizations are nonpartisan, yet it is uncertain whether their policy statements balance liberal and conservative values.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the political viewpoint of policy statements from 6 influential medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Psychiatric Association, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, and American Academy of Family Physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2023 and February 2024, policy statements from the 6 organizations were identified and evaluated using ChatGPT with GPT-4 to reduce bias. Each statement was pasted into a new ChatGPT session following the phrase \\\"Does this text align with a liberal or conservative viewpoint?\\\" Two authors reviewed each response and categorized the statement as liberal, probably liberal, neutral, probably conservative, or conservative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of policy statements (529/1592, 33.2%) were found to be aligned with a political ideology. Among these 529 statements, 516 (97.5%) were liberal or probably liberal and 13 (2.5%) were conservative or probably conservative. For each organization, among policy statements with a political leaning, the percentage of liberal or probably liberal statements was as follows: 100% (69/69) for the American Academy of Pediatrics, 100% (24/24) for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 100% (12/12) for the American College of Surgeons, 99% (72/73) for the American Psychiatric Association, 97% (174/180) for the American Academy of Family Physicians, and 96% (165/171) for the American College of Physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in 3 policy statements from these 6 professional organizations align with a partisan political viewpoint. Among these, positions are 40 times more likely to be liberal or probably liberal than conservative or probably conservative. Whether or not organizations are politically neutral and seek viewpoint diversity warrants further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e66204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/66204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专业医疗组织发布政策声明,用于影响立法或解决社会问题。许多组织是无党派的,但他们的政策声明是否平衡了自由主义和保守主义的价值观是不确定的。目的:评估美国儿科学会、美国外科医师学会、美国精神病学学会、美国妇产科医师学会、美国内科医师学会和美国家庭医师学会等6个有影响力的医学组织政策声明的政治观点。方法:在2023年12月至2024年2月期间,使用ChatGPT和GPT-4对6个组织的政策声明进行识别和评估,以减少偏倚。每个语句都被粘贴到一个新的ChatGPT会话中,后面跟着短语“这个文本与自由主义还是保守主义的观点一致?”两位作者审查了每个回答,并将其分类为自由主义、可能自由主义、中立、可能保守或保守。结果:三分之一的政策声明(529/1592,33.2%)与政治意识形态一致。在这529个陈述中,516个(97.5%)是自由主义或可能自由主义,13个(2.5%)是保守主义或可能保守主义。对于每个组织,在具有政治倾向的政策声明中,自由派或可能自由派声明的百分比如下:美国儿科学会为100%(69/69),美国妇产科学会为100%(24/24),美国外科学会为100%(12/12),美国精神病学协会为99%(72/73),美国家庭医生学会为97%(174/180),美国内科医师学会为96%(165/171)。结论:这6个专业组织三分之一的政策声明与党派政治观点一致。在这些立场中,自由主义或可能自由主义的可能性是保守主义或可能保守主义的40倍。组织是否在政治上保持中立,是否寻求观点的多样性,值得进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Political Viewpoint of Policy Statements From Professional Medical Organizations Using ChatGPT With GPT-4: Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Professional medical organizations publish policy statements that are used to impact legislation or address societal issues. Many organizations are nonpartisan, yet it is uncertain whether their policy statements balance liberal and conservative values.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the political viewpoint of policy statements from 6 influential medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Psychiatric Association, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, and American Academy of Family Physicians.

Methods: Between December 2023 and February 2024, policy statements from the 6 organizations were identified and evaluated using ChatGPT with GPT-4 to reduce bias. Each statement was pasted into a new ChatGPT session following the phrase "Does this text align with a liberal or conservative viewpoint?" Two authors reviewed each response and categorized the statement as liberal, probably liberal, neutral, probably conservative, or conservative.

Results: One-third of policy statements (529/1592, 33.2%) were found to be aligned with a political ideology. Among these 529 statements, 516 (97.5%) were liberal or probably liberal and 13 (2.5%) were conservative or probably conservative. For each organization, among policy statements with a political leaning, the percentage of liberal or probably liberal statements was as follows: 100% (69/69) for the American Academy of Pediatrics, 100% (24/24) for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 100% (12/12) for the American College of Surgeons, 99% (72/73) for the American Psychiatric Association, 97% (174/180) for the American Academy of Family Physicians, and 96% (165/171) for the American College of Physicians.

Conclusions: One in 3 policy statements from these 6 professional organizations align with a partisan political viewpoint. Among these, positions are 40 times more likely to be liberal or probably liberal than conservative or probably conservative. Whether or not organizations are politically neutral and seek viewpoint diversity warrants further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信